Pre-release Media Reviews From 12/6/2020 LA and Montreal Press Drives

[macchiaz-o]

In white, the differences aren't as stark.

I suppose, but I dunno... In these shots, one vehicle looks like a sloppily assembled quick test for internal testing, and the other looks beautiful.

 

[generaltso]

I suppose, but I dunno... In these shots, one vehicle looks like a sloppily assembled quick test for internal testing, and the other looks beautiful.

You‘re going to leave us hanging and not tell us which is which?

 

[Mach-E VLOG]

I suppose, but I dunno... In these shots, one vehicle looks like a sloppily assembled quick test for internal testing, and the other looks beautiful.

I noticed the alignment on the Model Y and zoomed in to look. Maybe it's the angle, but it sure looks like it is poorly put together.

 

[dbsb3233]

I suppose, but I dunno... In these shots, one vehicle looks like a sloppily assembled quick test for internal testing, and the other looks beautiful.

I just don't think the MME features stand out as much in white. Thus less of a difference.

YMMV, of course.

 

[RunningHorse]

MME shines in person. Looks infinitely better than in pictures. Not gonna lie the hood and door panel gaps on the MY are quite bad.

 

[Nav]

Quite a bit of discussion on that one already when it was posted this morning...

https://www.macheforum.com/site/thr...y-alex-on-autos-part-1.2280/page-5#post-69961

Aha! So it was in the Alex on Autos thread. Gotcha. I was wondering how it hadn't been posted as I read page after page here. You see, I was just trying to adhere to the keeping related content in this thread "rule" ?. Cannnoottt keep up. I'm sure there's already a thread about folks getting emails they their build date has been delayed a couple weeks. Just saw the email. Ain't sweating it. Feliz Navidad!

I've already put in for a half day off from work next Tuesday for all the videos that will hopefully be posted by the journalists.

 

[macchiaz-o]

theog.ho showing off Intelligent Range. (And of course, how useless 99.9% of the lookAtTheRangeICalculatedFromThisStaticImage discussions have been.)

 

[JamieGeek]

theog.ho showing off Intelligent Range. (And of course, how useless 99.9% of the lookAtTheRangeICalculatedFromTheseStaticImage discussions have been.)

He is just doing the EPA calculations for the CA Rt1 model.

349 miles is about right

 

[KAustin]

Fraternal twins...

 

[KAustin]

theog.ho showing off Intelligent Range. (And of course, how useless 99.9% of the lookAtTheRangeICalculatedFromTheseStaticImage discussions have been.)

Like that range.

 

[macchiaz-o]

He is just doing the EPA calculations for the CA Rt1 model.

349 miles is about right

Maybe they built it wrong then. I thought the "diamond" applique was First Edition only?

 

[dbsb3233]

Aha! So it was in the Alex on Autos thread. Gotcha. I was wondering how it hadn't been posted as I read page after page here. You see, I was just trying to adhere to the keeping related content in this thread "rule" ?. Cannnoottt keep up. I'm sure there's already a thread about folks getting emails they their build date has been delayed a couple weeks. Just saw the email. Ain't sweating it. Feliz Navidad!

I've already put in for a half day off from work next Tuesday for all the videos that will hopefully be posted by the journalists.

Yeah, I really don't think all the review videos are gonna work very well loaded into a single massive thread with replies to them flowing right and left. That could get really confusing. Hopefully they'll at least end up in this forum category though (Mach-E Photos and Videos). Seems like the right category for them., at least.

 

[macchiaz-o]

Yeah, I really don't think all the review videos are gonna work very well loaded into a single massive thread with replies to them flowing right and left. That could get really confusing. Hopefully they'll at least end up in this forum category though (Mach-E Photos and Videos). Seems like the right category for them., at least.

If not in a single thread, then we're more likely to have the same review posted several times in different threads.

 

[dbsb3233]

theog.ho showing off Intelligent Range. (And of course, how useless 99.9% of the lookAtTheRangeICalculatedFromThisStaticImage discussions have been.)

One might also conclude that 349 mile range is equally as useless though.

It can probably do better when a specific route is programmed in, but it doesn't look like there's one there (I assume it would be indicated on that screen).

The comment is really more an indictment on range predictions at all that aren't route specific. (Which of course includes EPA.)

 

[macchiaz-o]

One might also conclude that 349 mile range is equally as useless though.

Yep! That is my point.

It can probably do better when a specific route is programmed in, but it doesn't look like there's one there (I assume it would be indicated on that screen).

The comment is really more an indictment on range predictions at all that aren't route specific. (Which of course includes EPA.)

What I'm really getting at is that there is little to gain from analyzing one-off range displays from others who don't drive the same way or in the same places as we do.

Sponsored