I don't believe 3rd party licensing of self driving is possible. There are too many risks with consumer self driving that you would need to build your own cars. It has to be a car manufacturer, otherwise you're just building a car with the design of someone who doesn't know how to build a car...
I'm not selling it to anyone. In fact I would not recommend anyone buy a tesla until minimum there is a path to unsupervised for consumers and AI5 comes out.
The software now does have value if you are looking for a new car
Even worse is the comment after it. The car wants to accelerate (at only 46mph) into a stationary car
This is not some 62mph limitation at night time. This is a hard limitation in broad daylight.
Why the manual says "may not" when it doesn't do it at all is puzzling.
That is incorrect. https://www.macheforum.com/site/threads/why-the-mme-advanced-cruise-control-system-is-not-reacting-on-stationary-objects-ahead.19224/post-456581
You can see on this forum. A mach-e does not even see a stationary vehicle going 55mph. I'm pretty sure it doesn't above 45mph...
What do you mean when you see it? Tesla already has approval in many states
They are approved in florida, texas, nevada, arizona, and several others
People have this shocking misconception that cameras are blinded by the sun, can't see at night, or in heavy rain, or they don't work in fog...
People have this shocking misconception that cameras are blinded by the sun, can't see at night, or in heavy rain, or they don't work in fog.
in every one of these conditions, cameras outperform your own eyes. They have better low light sensitivity, see better in rain, into the sun, and they...
WTF. Where did you get that idea?
Tesla was approved because they meet all legal requirements for approval.
Just like they meet all legal requirements anywhere in the world.
Tesla also can be approved in 19 other states overnight. It's no issue. There are 9 more states which require testing...
There are no laws anywhere in the U.S. or the world that require lidar. Tesla is already approved for driverless operation in texas. with no one behind the wheel. I mean robotaxi already has no one behind the wheel, just in the passenger's seat.
Because it works.
what? Find me a law that...
what does level 2 have to do with capability?
Even the SAE J0316 document clearly states that SAE levels are regulatory only and have no bearing on performance.
That's like saying all level 2 systems are the same. Of course not
Autopilot from 2015 in a tesla works on any roads and it can...
Because he's not paying attention. The value of the system is very good if you pay attention when you use it.
He also did not use FSD 13/14 which is about 2 years of advancement over the version he would have used
Again, people have not died from FSD
have people died from bluecruise? Yes. Does the manual say it "may not" see a stationary vehicle yet there is a clear limitaiton where the car can't see a stationary vehicle even in broad daylight? yes.
I was thinking about it. If another car company wants to do something like FSD.
First they have to build a car that collects data. It's not that easy because they need to build a car with regular software updates. Otherwise users won't connect the car to their home wifi and upload the data...
Because tesla was better by most metrics.
Much less service intervals, easy to buy the car, not having to deal with a dealership
And the refresh fixed every "issue" with the car besides looks. Which honestly I don't think the new model Y looks bad
If you drive one, you will immediately notice...
What people don't realize is it may be very unelegant how tesla lied to develop their self driving solution. Regardless, this will cause a world of problems for other carmakers if you can buy a car that can self drive and one that cannot.
imagine road tripping while sleeping. Why would you buy...
1. HW4 has been in place since 2023. But yes, it's possible HW5 is needed for autonomy. This is simply a computer upgrade for many people
Tesla actually did not make claims about "unsupervised" for many years now. The cars you are buying do not promis unsupervised
2. FSD is already legal...
you mean autopilot which is a software from 2017? And pretty sure tesla AEB has improved since then and this accident would not happen with a car from 2017
look at the euro NCAP which is the hardest emergency braking test. Tesla is always #1
They had a record high score of 98 and the test gets harder every single year because tesla always pushed the limits of what's possible.
By comparison, ford and GM have bottom-tier systems. They usually fail...
are these fanboy comments?
you say 1 second from an accident. The cars around you have brakes.
Tesla has the world's best auto emergency braking which only kicks in last minute, preventing accidents.
Combine these two things and near-death is an exaggeration if you are not driving at highway...
There's your ignorance. That was autopilot, not FSD.
FSD does not have problems with sun glare. In fact, FSD has not had a perception issue in years that has been caused by only using cameras.
That's incorrect. The issue with FSD is compute. You need a large computer with lots of memory to do...