90% Charge (Better for the HVB) vs 80% charge (more economical)

SteelMach

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
666
Reaction score
725
Location
Michigan
Vehicles
2021 Mustang Mach-E
Country flag
Hey all, new owner here.

Has anyone actually been able to get their Mach-E to charge to something other than 100%?

I configured FordPass to add my home address and save my preference at 80% SoC for the charge limit... but every time I plug it in, it goes to 100% regardless.

I don't see a way to do this from inside the vehicle, like in other EVs I've driven... am I missing something? I'd rather not keep going to 100% when not needed for daily use.
Sponsored

 

ChasingCoral

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Threads
379
Messages
12,433
Reaction score
24,587
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
GB E4X FE, Leaf, Tacoma, F-150 Lightning ordered
Occupation
Retired oceanographer
Country flag
The tricky thing about battery degradation is that everything matters, just by different amounts. So the question is usually “does it matter enough for me to care”.

If you intend to keep this car more than 15 years, and you enjoy being fastidious with your cars (have you ever sent an oil sample from one of your ICE vehicles into a lab for analysis?), then there are all sorts of little things you could do to wring a few more cycles out of the battery.

However, for most people, just the basic rules of “leave it plugged in at home and only charge over 90% on days when you’ll need it” will do the trick.

That said, with L2 chargers there is going to be very little degradation difference between the available powers. Even a 48A charger is only 0.1C charge rate for the ER battery which is very gentle. I would have no concerns about leaving an L2 charger at full power.

Back when batteries were much smaller, that charger could be something like a 0.33C on a 30kWh battery, which might be higher than desired.

And again, technically you’d get a teeny bit less degradation if you backed the power off a little, but I think the potential gains are very small and not worth futzing with. How high of an SOC you charge to every night, and how many miles you drive per year will make a much bigger impact long term.
So do you see any need to periodically charge to 100% to force the cells to balance?
 

Woeo

Well-Known Member
First Name
Woeo
Joined
Feb 2, 2020
Threads
31
Messages
996
Reaction score
990
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
Fusion Energi
Country flag
Saving a measly 10 cents every night over the course of a year will save $36.50 over the course of a year. That is like getting a few free "fill ups."
10 cents will buy me most of a kilowatt hour. 10/14 = ~ 70% or .7 kWh

The MME battery is ~88 kWh usable, so going from 70-80% or 80-90% should require 8.8 kWh for either interval.

Are you suggesting that:

70-80% requires 8.8 kWh + efficiency losses

while

80-90% requires 8.8 kWh + efficiency losses .7 KWh greater than the efficiency seen from 70-80%

That would be an additional 8% in lost efficiency over the interval. Seems suspect.
 
Last edited:

phidauex

Well-Known Member
First Name
Sam
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Threads
16
Messages
844
Reaction score
1,548
Location
Colorado
Vehicles
2021 MachE 4EX, 2006 Prius, 1997 Tacoma
Occupation
Renewable Energy Engineer
Country flag
So do you see any need to periodically charge to 100% to force the cells to balance?
No. I'm not sure what the minimum balancing SOC is for these batteries (I'm sure we'll figure it out when we start getting data off the CAN bus), but for similar batteries that I use, 80-85% is plenty to start balancing, so my guess is that the 90% reported SOC will still allow for any needed balancing.
Sponsored

 
 




Top