Advertisement



BlueMach

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2020
Messages
549
Reaction score
685
Location
USA
Vehicles
Mach-E First Edition
Country flag
when this first came down I started looking at Tesla again. But I have decided to go Ford Options for 3 years. If Ford doesn’t deliver on OTA upgrades and fully supporting the car then I’ll either upgrade to a newer model at the end of options or go with a competing vehicle. In 3 years EVs will probably be hitting 400 miles plus so I figure either way I’ll benefit from not committing now and seeing how things go.
I think I'm in the exact same boat. When they announced Android, I called my local VW dealer and asked about timing to get an ID.4 instead - figured if I'm going to buy an obsolete car, might as well save some money while I do it.

But the more I think about it, the more I come around to the Options for 3 years and expecting to upgrade to the Android OS.

If Ford comes through with a path forward for an Android upgrade for our 21MY cars I will gladly keep the car longer.
 

kdryden99

Well-Known Member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
1,076
Reaction score
928
Location
Montreal Canada
First Name
Richard
Vehicles
Nissan Sentra Spec-V, Nissan Rogue, Future Infinite Blue Mach E
Country flag
Visteon was spun-off to the public markets with 100.0% of the company owned by private investors. There is no shareholding between Ford and Visteon.

Visteon is as much as subsidiary of Ford as GM is.
ok understood. I didnt know that thank you.
 

BlueMach

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2020
Messages
549
Reaction score
685
Location
USA
Vehicles
Mach-E First Edition
Country flag
ok understood. I didnt know that thank you.
Ford and GM both did the same move around the same time to raise cash by getting rid of their components divisions. They spun their parts arms into separate companies - Ford parts division became Visteon, GM's parts division became Delphi.

They both struggled heavily, because neither company were run like real businesses while they were part of Ford or GM, they were not efficient, profit-focused, and as soon as they were independent companies, Ford and GM treated them like any other supplier. They put bids out to all suppliers and went with the lowest price, which, because Visteon and Delphi weren't run like businesses, meant the Ford and GM business awards went to other companies, shrinking their revenues further, and both Visteon and Delphi headed to bankruptcy and further shrinking.

Visteon is a shell of what it was when Ford owned it, having sold off businesses left and right and now just doing electronics.

Visteon had 81,000 employees and $19B in sales in 2000 (in 2000 dollars). Now they have 8,000 employees and under $3B in sales.

Delphi is similarly a shell of its former self, but now goes by Aptiv.
 

MJMachForum

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
45
Reaction score
101
Location
USA
First Name
Mark
Vehicles
2019 Ford Flex
Occupation
IT
Country flag
Isn't that a lease? Or Options in this case?
For those who want a whole new car, yes. I can continue to pay several hundered $$ a month to get the new car with new features or I can pay under $50 or so a month to ge the new infotainment system.

Also, those who choose to keep the car and second owners are left sol. Cars should not have a short end of life. Especially since auto manufacturers and EV enthusiasts are touting that the car can go 500k miles easy. Why wouldn’t we expect the software supportability to be in the same ball park?
 

Redundant

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
352
Reaction score
418
Location
New Jersey
First Name
Jim
Vehicles
1 Ford Edge, 1 Ford Flex, 2 Ford Escapes
Country flag
when this first came down I started looking at Tesla again. But I have decided to go Ford Options for 3 years. If Ford doesn’t deliver on OTA upgrades and fully supporting the car then I’ll either upgrade to a newer model at the end of options or go with a competing vehicle. In 3 years EVs will probably be hitting 400 miles plus so I figure either way I’ll benefit from not committing now and seeing how things go.
This is the conclusion I have come to as well. Just can’t decide between 3 or 4 years. I feel like 4 gives me a little more room for significant advances in various technologies.
 

silverelan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2019
Messages
1,476
Reaction score
1,831
Location
Seattle
Vehicles
2015 Subaru Outback
Country flag
This is the conclusion I have come to as well. Just can’t decide between 3 or 4 years. I feel like 4 gives me a little more room for significant advances in various technologies.
Man, I just hate the idea of more years of car payments.
 

Redundant

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jim
Joined
Nov 18, 2019
Messages
352
Reaction score
418
Location
New Jersey
First Name
Jim
Vehicles
1 Ford Edge, 1 Ford Flex, 2 Ford Escapes
Country flag
Man, I just hate the idea of more years of car payments.
If this were a completely rational decision on my part, I would keep my 2015 Edge Sport, which has 91K miles and will be paid off in....checking...two months. So, I could just keep driving it for at least another 5 years. I am trading it in on the MME. I have wanted an EV for a while, and this came along at just the right time. But, like you, not happy about more payments. But, between the trade in, the Fed money, the NJ state money $5K (fingers crossed), no sales tax on EVs in NJ, I am able to rationalize it to myself. And that is key, self rationalization, the enabler of most of my unnecessary purchases. Will have to see if I want to stay on the payment wheel in three or four years and get something new or just buy it and accept whatever relative short comings it might have against new available EVs in 2025.
 

quitepossibly

Member
First Name
Stephen
Joined
Jan 6, 2021
Messages
22
Reaction score
20
Location
California
First Name
Stephen
Vehicles
Model 3
Country flag
I wouldn't be losing my mind for new OS or feature set upgrades. It keeps the car in pace with what customers are expecting from the vehicle. Just because Ford doesn't offer the upgrade doesn't mean its not possible. My 2013 Flex had MyFord Touch (Sync 2) but you could easily upgrade the hardware to Sync 3 as the 2016+ Flex models had Sync 3. Ford could offer an easy upgrade provided the mounting and digital interface are the same. I don't understand the mindset of getting upset for getting "new car" with every OS upgrade.

The bigger concerns here are single integration and going cheap on the hardware so that OS upgrades are not possible. I mean the low end iPhones have more power than infotainment systems so we know its possible to build affordable hardware with some forethought for long lived software support. The Sync packages Ford has offered in the past were about $1500-$2500 of which the hardware accounted for maybe $200 max cost to Ford. Ford has a huge markup on infotainment hardware. Maybe that had to do with software development but with Android Automotive that cost is reduced. Also, map licensing will not be that big of a concern with connected cars.
This is a bit of a popular misconception. A big reason why consumer electronics like iPhones and the like are so much cheaper is the production volume is a lot higher. Apple sells nearly 200 million iPhones a year; with most of the phones sold being the latest models. Meanwhile, Ford doesn't even sell 3 million cars worldwide a year.

When you're selling hundreds of millions of products per year, the R&D costs per unit are almost negligible. That isn't really the case for car makers.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2020
Messages
7
Reaction score
6
Location
Littleton, CO
Vehicles
2007 BMW 530xi, 2005 Toyota 4Runner
Country flag
Tesla is an outlier, with their willingness to add new features to older products.

The consumer products industry prefers to build a product with a defined feature set then push updates to that product until each of those features work as intended, maybe with a few tweaks to address design flaws. Once that goal is met it's on to the next product with a new feature set.

As much as Darren Palmer and Mike Levine want to push out a continuously evolving product, I can't see Ford doing something as drastic as back-porting an AA based infotainment system to not one, but two previously released products – the '22 MME and the '21 MME.

In the 2021 MME case, I expect updates to SYNC 4 will occur until it reliably does everything the 2021 owner's manual says it will do, maybe with some easy to implement tweaks. Then it's fully baked, out the door.

The 2023 MME will come with a new feature set leveraging Android Automotive's unique abilities, and will see updates until it reliably provide those features. And so on.

That said, I've seriously studied and test driven both the 2021 Volvo XC40 Recharge and the Polestar 2 — the only production vehicles built with Android Automotive — and that infotainment system is exceptionally good. It's nearly good enough to push me into one of those two cars. Still the MME provides other features that offset it, such as next-generation Driver Assist.

Would I like Android Automotive on my 2021 MME? Absolutely. Do I expect to get it? No.
 
Last edited:

crownmountain

Active Member
First Name
Dave
Joined
Aug 5, 2020
Messages
25
Reaction score
20
Location
Durham NC
First Name
Dave
Vehicles
2015 Mustang EcoBoost Premium Convertable, 2014 F150 King Ranch
Occupation
Industrial network architect
Country flag
I fully agree. If I see the available technology of the actual cars compared with my 6 years OLD car :eek: Everyone should accept that technology is changing fast and Ford has to follow this trend. A car that is ordered today is old stuff for the developers of the V2023
You mean like this old technology...SD Cards for map updates :)
 

Attachments

MJMachForum

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Aug 7, 2020
Messages
45
Reaction score
101
Location
USA
First Name
Mark
Vehicles
2019 Ford Flex
Occupation
IT
Country flag
Regarding the battery technology, Ford built this chassis and battery pack to be modular. That being said, there’s no reason that the newer battery technology cannot go into current Mach E’s unless Ford purposely designs the new battery packs to not be compatible. Whether that means software limitations or a physical design that just won’t line up, that remains to be seen. Darren has already said the charging hardware is capable of charging beyond 150kw so we know there is room for growth, so to speak.

This is a computer on wheels, custome built computers last far longer than purpose built computers because of the modular designs. You can always switch out hardware in custom PCs. I’m not saying Ford is going to design their cars this way. Until a full model redesign, parts in newer models change as newer tech comes out, making them different from those of the initial model release. They fit into the same places and connect to the same harnesses.

It’s all a matter of mindset, some of which is driven by customer demand. If customers say “This car is rated to last 500k miles and should be supported throughout its life.” Then Ford has some incentive to make some changes to remain competitive. ICE vehicles have components that break down due to the nature of a gas engine. BEVs don’t have this problem. Ford would be making cars that are supported on the basis of ICE standards and not BEV design.
 



 









Advertisement


Top