Charging Shootout! Ranking the DC Fast Charging Networks

silverelan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2019
Threads
117
Messages
3,019
Reaction score
4,298
Location
Seattle
Vehicles
2021 Mustang Mach-E GT
Country flag
https://chargedevs.com/features/202...-rating-the-dc-fast-charging-user-experience/

2020 EV Charging Infrastructure Best-in-Test: Rating the DC fast charging user experience
Posted December 10, 2020 by Charged EVs & filed under Features, Infrastructure Features.

Seal_BiT_umlaut_Charging-Infrastructure_v3.png

If EVs are to replace fossil-fuel vehicles, they need to be able to make long highway trips, which means that DC fast charging needs to be reliable, convenient, affordable and ubiquitous.

However, as Charged and other media have often reported, we’re still in the early days of public EV charging, and the user experience often leaves much to be desired. Not every charging attempt is successful, and important details, like how to begin a charging session, how much it will cost, and if stations are available or out of order, are often not made clear to users.

How do the various public fast charging networks compare in terms of reliability, convenience, coverage and price? Charged recently partnered with the German firm umlaut to begin to determine the state of the charging network user experience. After performing a comparative study of network providers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland earlier this year, umlaut adapted its testing methodology to the US market, and together we developed the new 2020 EV Charging Infrastructure Best-in-Test award.

Our first comparative analysis of the largest fast charging networks was conducted this year, and each network was rated using several criteria. This study did not include Tesla’s proprietary Supercharger network. (A separate analysis of Tesla’s user experience will be completed in the coming months.)

umlaut’s field team looked at authentication methods, interoperability, prices, transparency, functionality and availability, among other elements. How intuitive and convenient is the charging process? How convenient is parking at the charging location? Is the available charging power suitable for the location?

Terminology
Observers of the US and European charging scenes may find the different terminology confusing at first. In Europe the term charging point is commonly used to refer to what we in the US call a charging station. In Europe, companies that manage charging sites are called charge point operators (CPOs), whereas the companies that manage payments, apps, reservations, etc, are called mobility service providers (MSPs). In the US, these functions are generally handled by a single company, for which we don’t (yet) have a generally-accepted acronym—we usually just call them charging networks.
A test of the network’s best efforts: methodology
To be clear, this report is a study conducted on top charging sites in one of the most electrified areas in the country, and not a comprehensive overview of the US charging marketplace.

Testing took place in EV hotspot California, in early September 2020. umlaut tested three locations for each of five different charging network operators: Electrify America, EVgo, ChargePoint, EV Connect and Greenlots.

The availability of DC fast charging from multiple networks is only the case in a handful of markets in the US. So, you could consider this is a comparison of the charging industry’s best efforts: a search for the best user experience currently available.


824193828.jpg



2726718833.jpg



3004710502.jpg



705365113.jpg



1710744312.jpg



1565947888.jpg



992915268.jpg



59718220.jpg




For testing, umlaut chose two different EVs in two different classes: the Audi e-tron crossover SUV and BMW’s i3 subcompact city car. Both use the CCS Type 1 charging standard. “What we tried to do is to have two cars that are pretty different from each other,” explained Christian Sussbauer, umlaut’s EV expert, who led the study.

In order to rank the different networks, the team split its analysis into two areas: the physical interaction at the charging station location; and the digital experience on a network’s web site and smartphone app. The company developed a comprehensive set of key performance indicators in order to compare the most important aspects of charging among the different networks.

The testing team used the following categories and key performance indicators to compare the charging networks:

Web site
Especially for new EV drivers, a company’s web site might be the first point of contact. The following questions are important for users:

  • Is all relevant information clearly presented?
  • Is there a tutorial to demonstrate to new EV drivers how charging works?
  • What types of network memberships are available?
  • How transparent is the pricing?
  • What are the locations of the nearest charging stations?
App operation
The focus in this category is the user interface of a network’s smartphone app. Criteria considered include:

  • ease of use
  • intuitive operation
  • ease of account creation
  • ease of locating available charging stations
App functionality
The capabilities of smartphone apps were considered as a separate category. The study took a detailed look at the functionalities of the various networks’ apps, in particular real-time data, filtering options, language, the visibility of stations belonging to other networks, and information on charging power and time.

Price transparency and payment
Whereas gas stations display their pricing on prominent signage, at EV charging stations it is often not clear what the cost of a charging session will be. The study evaluated the price structure and transparency of each network.

Charging station environment
The physical surroundings of a charging station are important. Signage, weather protection and illumination are key elements of driver convenience. This report also considered the availability of amenities (restrooms, restaurants, shops) at each station.

Charging station functionality
This analysis focused on the user interaction with the charging station itself. Is the user interface intuitive? Are instructions clear? Is charging power and other information provided before, during and after charging? How easy is it to park in such a way that the charging cable can easily reach the EV’s charging port? One very important indicator: does the charging process start on the first try?

Service and hotlines
From instructions to authentication and payment to technical problems, there are several issues that can disturb a successful charging process. umlaut’s testing team contacted the networks’ support hotlines for help with various simulated scenarios, and scored the results based on the visibility and availability of the hotline number, multi-language options, error access and any charging tips provided.

Payment
For this category, the study considered the payment possibilities available, including credit/debit card readers, authentication and payment via RFID cards, and newer options such as Apple Pay and Google Pay.


2996966246.jpg



4164665402.jpg



2698126209.jpg



162051484.jpg



2395679380.jpg



131386881.jpg



4100748293.jpg



4080320819.jpg




High-level findings that apply to all the networks
Charging locations:

  • Overall poor reliability. Success rate of charging was far below 100%.
  • Maintenance of charging stations needs improvement (out-of-service signs, cables on the ground, displays not working, etc)
  • No weather protection from sun and rain/snow
  • Inadequate lighting
  • Charging stations sometimes hard to find, signage is poor
  • Instructions in English only, no option for Spanish
  • Some charging stations are very noisy
Pricing:

  • More price transparency is needed
  • Estimated total price to charge is missing (to 80% or to 100% charge level)
Smartphone app:

  • Locations of other networks’ stations are often not shown
  • No option to reserve a charging station
  • Not enough information about amenities at charging location (restrooms, shops, restaurants, etc)
  • Not enough information about out-of-service charging stations

Network ratings
Electrify America is the winner of the 2020 EV Charging Infrastructure Best-in-Test award, with an overall score of 691 out of a possible 1,000 points. EVgo ranked second, with 610 points, followed by ChargePoint, EV Connect and Greenlots.

Electrify America scored highest in 4 of the 8 categories (Web site, App operation, Charging station environment, Charging station functionality). Third-place ChargePoint won top marks in 3 categories (App functionality, Service and hotlines, Payment). EV Connect prevailed in the Price transparency and payment category.


1612630881.jpg




Electrify America
Overall score: 691

Pros:

  • Web site and app feature clean, transparent design
  • Charging station operation is intuitive
  • Many high-powered DC fast charging stations along highways
  • Illumination makes charging stations easy to find at night
Cons:

  • Relatively high prices
  • Starting problems and interruptions
  • Charging process takes a long time to start
  • No RFID card available
  • No QR code scanning for charging station identification
  • Short cables make it difficult to reach EV charging ports

a-Best-in-Test-DC-Charging-Infrastructure-USA-2020.jpg

Additional insights:
Electrify America’s charging network is spread out throughout the US, and strategically connects key metro areas, making long EV road trips convenient. Its charging stations are well-illuminated, which makes spotting them easier at night, and attracts even non-EV drivers. However, this superior user experience comes at a cost—charging prices are at the higher end of the range.


EVgo
Overall score: 610 points

Pros:

  • Interoperability with other networks
  • Support for all US charging standards (CCS, CHAdeMO, Tesla)
  • Consistent price structure
  • App provides easy access to nearest charging station on home screen
Cons:

  • Not many high-power stations (most are 50 kW)
  • Success rate of charging at first attempt is too low
  • Short cables make it difficult to reach EV charging ports
  • Plugs (CCS, CHAdeMO) are often misidentified in the app
Additional insights:
EVgo’s stations support both the CCS and CHAdeMO standards, and a growing number also feature Tesla connectors. However, umlaut’s testing found that charging was often not successful on the first attempt, which is bound to lead to frustration, especially for new EV drivers.


ChargePoint
Overall score: 604

Pros:

  • Interoperability with other networks
  • Charging is efficient and easy
  • Filter options for free charging stations
  • Extensive Level 2 network, growing number of DC fast chargers
  • App provides charger utilization information (including peak hours)
Cons:

  • Identification of the right charging station is challenging
  • Very small displays, providing little information
  • Profile creation in app takes too long
  • Not many high-power stations
Additional insights:
ChargePoint continues to grow its network at a significant rate, and it currently offers the largest number of charging stations of any provider in the US. However, most of these are Level 2 stations. The umlaut team found that many of ChargePoint’s DC fast charging stations were not yet up to the market standard—compared to other networks, they have smaller displays and offer less information for drivers.


EV Connect
Overall score: 566 points

Pros:

  • Very efficient charging process
  • Great user experience using the app and charging stations
  • Good charging station locations
  • Prices are indicated during charging process
Cons:

  • Maintenance of charging stations needs to be improved (including out-of-service indication)
  • Very little information provided on web site
  • App has no full zoom-out map function
  • DC charging stations are mainly in California and the Northeast
Additional insights:
Using the EV Connect network is simple and efficient, which leads to an excellent user experience with clear interaction. However, maintenance needs to be improved, as umlaut found that some stations were out of service, and were not indicated as such in the app.


Greenlots
Overall score: 512 points

Pros:

  • App operation and layout is the best of the networks tested
  • QR scanning to easily identify charging stations
  • Comprehensive real time data during charging process (kW, kWh, SOC, time)
Cons:

  • Very little information provided on web site
  • Location of charging stations not always convenient
  • Price transparency has room for improvement
  • App has limited filter options for charging stations
  • Not many high-power stations (most are 50 kW)
Additional insights:
Greenlots’ highly functional app provides an advanced digital interface with various app functionalities to keep users informed. However, the user experience could be improved in terms of convenience and price transparency.


Conclusion and outlook
Looking at the final scores, two conclusions are obvious. First, the charging market is quite competitive—in many categories, the scores of the networks tested were very close. This was especially true in the authentication and payment category—this process was easy and comfortable for all the networks tested.

The category with the biggest disparity in scores was the network web sites. “For newcomers to the EV space, they may need to be able to go to a company’s web site and educate themselves,” explained umlaut’s Sussbauer. “We asked, from a user perspective, what kind of information can I get on the web site? Two networks—Greenlots and EV Connect—have pretty much nothing on their sites, other than ‘Please download the app.’ It’s a stark contrast to the others with massive web sites containing a lot of information about both public and residential charging.”

The second main conclusion is that there is still much room for improvement—no network came close to reaching the maximum score of 1,000 points. There are several reasons for this, beginning with the environment of the charging stations, which do not offer the convenience we are used to when filling up at a gas station. A lack of lighting and shelter often leaves EV drivers out in the dark and/or rain.

Interoperability among different networks is an area where we’d like to see improvement in the near future. Being able to use a single smartphone app or RFID card to access all public charging stations (roaming) would certainly improve the user experience. Reliability of charging stations in terms of “charging on the first try” needs to be improved to put smiles on the faces of green drivers.

Future testing
Charged and umlaut plan to continue this partnership to bring you future reports on the state of the charging network user experience. Next year’s work will expand beyond California to include more regions of North America.

Updated key performance indicators will be developed, as well as an “ideal charging process” for EV drivers. In future reports, benchmarks will indicate how much the various networks deviate from that ideal process, including the Tesla Supercharger experience. Next year’s analysis will also likely include the new Plug and Charge feature, which allows charging without the need for a card or a smartphone app.


Who is umlaut?
Q&A with Hakan Ekmen, Managing Director umlaut US



Comments?
You can reach the testing team with comments, clarifications, suggestions for future work, etc. at [email protected].
 

dbsb3233

Well-Known Member
First Name
TimCO
Joined
Dec 30, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
9,299
Reaction score
10,814
Location
Colorado, USA
Vehicles
2021 Mustang Mach-E FE, 2023 Bronco Sport OB
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
I think that gap widens quite a bit for newbies, and thus the adoption of BEVs. Also in states outside of CA.

EA's visibility of pricing and consistency of power levels are a BIG selling points. So is their choice to locate many of their chargers at key points along interstates (where most people care about them - for road trips).

It's basically EA, and then a bunch of confusing/inconsistent others. Experienced users probably find the others useful, but it's EA that's the selling point for newbies.
 

EVer

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2020
Threads
0
Messages
455
Reaction score
455
Location
San Diego, CA
Vehicles
Ford F-150 SuperCrew Cab, Tesla Model 3P
Country flag
I''d never even heard of EV Connect before.

Turns out the closest one is 38 miles away and in a direction from home I rarely go. EVGo and Electrify America, by comparison, are within 5 and 10 miles, respectively. Greenlots is 72 miles distant.
 

GoGoGadgetMachE

Well-Known Member
First Name
Michael
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Threads
153
Messages
5,614
Reaction score
12,654
Location
Ohio
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E 1st Ed., 2022 Lightning Platinum
Occupation
Professional forum cheerleader and fanboy
Country flag
I''d never even heard of EV Connect before.

Turns out the closest one is 38 miles away and in a direction from home I rarely go. EVGo and Electrify America, by comparison, are within 5 and 10 miles, respectively. Greenlots is 72 miles distant.
the EVconnect web site score suggests nobody else will ever hear of them ?
 


Illinibird

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Threads
40
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
1,445
Location
Frankfort Illinois
Vehicles
2015 Acura MDX Adv; 2016 Titanium Fusion Hybrid
Occupation
retired Endodontist (root canal specialist) and Clinical Assistant Professor
Country flag
Many of the reviews state that a "con" in their rating of a ChargePoint is the failure of a charge happening on the first attempt. I am asking why? Is it because most of us will be new to EV charging and if so, what will we be doing wrong to cause this failure on the first attempt? Is there a mechanical or procedural reason for this failure on the first attempt?

I agree that we're lucky Ford aligned with EA and it makes me feel that perhaps I would take my MME on a long trip. I still can't get over the length of time it takes to charge, even using a "fast" DC charger. When you fill up with gas it is a relatively quick process and the availability of restrooms and conveniences is usually good. Charging at a DC charger will take a lot longer than a gas fill up and you can't be sure the charging facility will be well lit, out of the weather, in working condition, have clean restrooms, easy to use for a "newbie" and the price is usually not advertised at the charger (I know, many of the smartphone apps have this info but not all). These concerns are a lot less in California and the NE coast but for us midwesterners it is still an issue. These "cons" for me still tilt the scales of taking my ICE Acura on long trips (even though it burns premium) and using the MME solely as my daily drive around home. I just don't think battery technology today is ready for prime time for longer trips (for me anyway).
 

dbsb3233

Well-Known Member
First Name
TimCO
Joined
Dec 30, 2019
Threads
54
Messages
9,299
Reaction score
10,814
Location
Colorado, USA
Vehicles
2021 Mustang Mach-E FE, 2023 Bronco Sport OB
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Many of the reviews state that a "con" in their rating of a ChargePoint is the failure of a charge happening on the first attempt. I am asking why? Is it because most of us will be new to EV charging and if so, what will we be doing wrong to cause this failure on the first attempt? Is there a mechanical or procedural reason for this failure on the first attempt?

I agree that we're lucky Ford aligned with EA and it makes me feel that perhaps I would take my MME on a long trip. I still can't get over the length of time it takes to charge, even using a "fast" DC charger. When you fill up with gas it is a relatively quick process and the availability of restrooms and conveniences is usually good. Charging at a DC charger will take a lot longer than a gas fill up and you can't be sure the charging facility will be well lit, out of the weather, in working condition, have clean restrooms, easy to use for a "newbie" and the price is usually not advertised at the charger (I know, many of the smartphone apps have this info but not all). These concerns are a lot less in California and the NE coast but for us midwesterners it is still an issue. These "cons" for me still tilt the scales of taking my ICE Acura on long trips (even though it burns premium) and using the MME solely as my daily drive around home. I just don't think battery technology today is ready for prime time for longer trips (for me anyway).
It's certainly more compromising to take a BEV on long trips relative to ICE, that's for sure. Many routes (but far from all) are possible, but whether they'll be preferable over ICE in the Mach-E is just up to each person's preferences and tolerances. It's truly different for everyone, as can be witnessed by the wide variety of opinions you'll see in these forums.

I started out the year thinking I'd make the Mach-E my around-home only vehicle and just take our Escape on all road trips. The plan at the time was just to get the SR battery and save the $5000, since 210 is plenty of range around home. But I ultimately decided to splurge for the ER. EA has since filled in a crucial gap on our few-times-a-year Denver-Vegas drive, and we plan to try it in the Spring. It'll add a few hours to the drive for all the charging time, forcing us to stop in the middle for a hotel night. 2 refuels turns into 5 or 6, and they're 30-40 minutes each instead of 5 (although one would double as a lunch anyway). It's definitely a more plodding approach to make all those extra stops. No more cannonballing. But we're now in our 60's, and we might actually enjoy a slower approach. I don't particularly like HAVING to compromise that way, but we want to try it. While our Escape is great, the Mach-E has even more creature comforts.
 

Illinibird

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Threads
40
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
1,445
Location
Frankfort Illinois
Vehicles
2015 Acura MDX Adv; 2016 Titanium Fusion Hybrid
Occupation
retired Endodontist (root canal specialist) and Clinical Assistant Professor
Country flag
Thanks. My wife and I are in our early 70’s and this is still a concern to us. We travel from Chicago to Palm City Florida (to see our youngest daughter and granddaughter) in 2 days now (stop in Atlanta GA) and NO WAY can I see us doing this in the MME even if we stayed 3 nights in hotels rather than the one night in GA. There are too many stretches where stopping for gas is a challenge let alone trying to find an EV chargepoint. I look at it another way in that maybe if we were younger and more adventuresome we might try it. No, The technology and infrastructure isn’t there yet IMHO. And quite frankly, our Acura MDX is a lot larger and more comfortable than a smaller SUV.
PS - We have made the drive from Chicago to Palm City in one day (close to 24 hours) and this would not be even possible with a MME and today’s infrastructure and battery technology. If I’m wrong about doing this trip in 24 hours with an EV vehicle please enlighten me as to how it would be done because no way can I see it! Saying buying a Tesla with their Supercharging Network is no fair ?
 
Last edited:

timbop

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Threads
63
Messages
6,729
Reaction score
13,758
Location
New Jersey
Vehicles
Solar powered 2021 MME ER RWD & 2022 Corsair PHEV
Occupation
Software Engineer
Country flag
Thanks. My wife and I are in our early 70’s and this is still a concern to us. We travel from Chicago to Palm City Florida (to see our youngest daughter and granddaughter) in 2 days now (stop in Atlanta GA) and NO WAY can I see us doing this in the MME even if we stayed 3 nights in hotels rather than the one night in GA. There are too many stretches where stopping for gas is a challenge let alone trying to find an EV chargepoint. I look at it another way in that maybe if we were younger and more adventuresome we might try it. No, The technology and infrastructure isn’t there yet IMHO. And quite frankly, our Acura MDX is a lot larger and more comfortable than a smaller SUV.
PS - We have made the drive from Chicago to Palm City in one day (close to 24 hours) and this would not be even possible with a MME and today’s infrastructure and battery technology. If I’m wrong about doing this trip in 24 hours with an EV vehicle please enlighten me as to how it would be done because no way can I see it! Saying buying a Tesla is no fair ?
Have you tried using abetterrouteplanner or plugshare to map out your route? ABRP is imperfect, but puts the trip at under 24hrs: 19:00 driving and 4:23 charging. The realistic number is probably a little more, but that's a reasonable approximation. This is for an ER RWD with the base mi/kwh of 3.1, speed @110%, starting at 100%, 15% charger arrival SOC, and 80% max charging along the way. Using the default of 2.92 mi/kwh it comes in right at 24hrs. Most of the stops are at Walmarts or Targets, so although they aren't covered they will be well lit and have restrooms, along with some sort of food nearby.

Ford Mustang Mach-E Charging Shootout!  Ranking the DC Fast Charging Networks Screenshot from 2020-12-14 07-50-14


*** EDIT: I mistakenly typed "AWD" instead of "RWD"
 
Last edited:

jhalkias

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Mar 3, 2020
Threads
122
Messages
2,482
Reaction score
4,953
Location
Ohio
Vehicles
'21 RR ME FE, '22 Corsair GT, '22 Lightning Lariat
Occupation
Benefit Fund Administrator
Country flag
Many of the reviews state that a "con" in their rating of a ChargePoint is the failure of a charge happening on the first attempt. I am asking why? Is it because most of us will be new to EV charging and if so, what will we be doing wrong to cause this failure on the first attempt? Is there a mechanical or procedural reason for this failure on the first attempt?

I agree that we're lucky Ford aligned with EA and it makes me feel that perhaps I would take my MME on a long trip. I still can't get over the length of time it takes to charge, even using a "fast" DC charger. When you fill up with gas it is a relatively quick process and the availability of restrooms and conveniences is usually good. Charging at a DC charger will take a lot longer than a gas fill up and you can't be sure the charging facility will be well lit, out of the weather, in working condition, have clean restrooms, easy to use for a "newbie" and the price is usually not advertised at the charger (I know, many of the smartphone apps have this info but not all). These concerns are a lot less in California and the NE coast but for us midwesterners it is still an issue. These "cons" for me still tilt the scales of taking my ICE Acura on long trips (even though it burns premium) and using the MME solely as my daily drive around home. I just don't think battery technology today is ready for prime time for longer trips (for me anyway).
What they did not mention about ChargePoint that I learned on the InsideEV's podcast is that ChargePoint is an entirely different model than EA. ChargePoint sells their chargers to independent operators. Their network is more of a "franchise" model than an ownership model. If the individual private owners are not taking care of their stations, it is an issue with that owner. This is also why there are more L2 stations with ChargePoint as that is a much cheaper option for an independent owner.
 

Illinibird

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Threads
40
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
1,445
Location
Frankfort Illinois
Vehicles
2015 Acura MDX Adv; 2016 Titanium Fusion Hybrid
Occupation
retired Endodontist (root canal specialist) and Clinical Assistant Professor
Country flag
Have you tried using abetterrouteplanner or plugshare to map out your route? ABRP is imperfect, but puts the trip at under 24hrs: 19:00 driving and 4:23 charging. The realistic number is probably a little more, but that's a reasonable approximation. This is for an ER RWD with the base mi/kwh of 3.1, speed @110%, starting at 100%, 15% charger arrival SOC, and 80% max charging along the way. Using the default of 2.92 mi/kwh it comes in right at 24hrs. Most of the stops are at Walmarts or Targets, so although they aren't covered they will be well lit and have restrooms, along with some sort of food nearby.

Screenshot from 2020-12-14 07-50-14.png


*** EDIT: I mistakenly typed "AWD" instead of "RWD"
Thanks. I bought an AWD Std battery ("The Boss" said absolutely not for Ext range battery even though that was my original plan :mad: ; "too much money for too few miles extra") NEWSFLASH:The Boss allowed me to change our order and now it is an EXTENDED BATTERY with AWD! so it definitely WOULD NOT work for us! Also, I've seen a lot of the gas stations where neither my wife nor I would stop at in TN and GA. I don't know if your map has charging stations owned by EA so the level of the charge station would be up to grade as opposed to private ownership where it would be more of a crap shoot. Doesn't really matter for us as we'd never do it and IMHO you're being way too optimistic even with the Ext battery and RWD (4 hours 23 minutes charging?? I don't think so). When I said we did the drive in 24 hours it was really ~ 19 hours driving and we got up after about 4 hours sleep the next morning (we'd get NO sleep in your model). Just my opinion so please don't flame me!?

PS- Are those DC chargers in your scenario? I think those would be even harder to find along the way.
 
Last edited:

jhalkias

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Mar 3, 2020
Threads
122
Messages
2,482
Reaction score
4,953
Location
Ohio
Vehicles
'21 RR ME FE, '22 Corsair GT, '22 Lightning Lariat
Occupation
Benefit Fund Administrator
Country flag
Thanks. I bought an AWD Std battery ("The Boss" said absolutely not for Ext range battery even though that was my original plan :mad: ; "too much money for too few miles extra") so it definitely WOULD NOT work for us! Also, I've seen a lot of the gas stations where neither my wife nor I would stop at in TN and GA. I don't know if your map has charging stations owned by EA so the level of the charge station would be up to grade as opposed to private ownership where it would be more of a crap shoot. Doesn't really matter for us as we'd never do it and IMHO you're being way too optimistic even with the Ext battery and RWD (4 hours 23 minutes charging?? I don't think so). When I said we did the drive in 24 hours it was really ~ 19 hours driving and we got up after about 4 hours sleep the next morning. Just my opinion so please don't flame me!?
No flaming, but you really should watch some of @OutofSpecKyle videos on the Outofspec motoring Youtube channel to get a better feel for this. MOST, but not ALL of those road trip videos are with a Tesla and the Supercharge network, but some are with EA. Do what makes you comfortable, but it is not out of the realm, but I do understand that with the smaller battery that limits you more.
 

JamieGeek

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2019
Threads
82
Messages
3,556
Reaction score
6,746
Location
Southeastern Michigan
Website
spareelectrons.wordpress.com
Vehicles
Mach-E, old: Bolt, C-Max Energi, Focus Electric
Country flag
Thanks. I bought an AWD Std battery ("The Boss" said absolutely not for Ext range battery even though that was my original plan :mad: ; "too much money for too few miles extra") so it definitely WOULD NOT work for us! Also, I've seen a lot of the gas stations where neither my wife nor I would stop at in TN and GA. I don't know if your map has charging stations owned by EA so the level of the charge station would be up to grade as opposed to private ownership where it would be more of a crap shoot. Doesn't really matter for us as we'd never do it and IMHO you're being way too optimistic even with the Ext battery and RWD (4 hours 23 minutes charging?? I don't think so). When I said we did the drive in 24 hours it was really ~ 19 hours driving and we got up after about 4 hours sleep the next morning. Just my opinion so please don't flame me!?
The AWD Std battery has range similar to the original Bolt (latest version is 250+ miles EPA).

Plenty of people make long range trips in that (and the Mach-E would be MUCH more comfortable to take the trip in vs a Bolt! LOL).

We have and haven't: We've taken 800+ road trips with the Bolt but its been on a dolly and not moving itself so I guess that doesn't count.

I do take the Bolt all over town and have done a trip or two "beyond" range where I needed a charge to at least make it back home.
 

Illinibird

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Threads
40
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
1,445
Location
Frankfort Illinois
Vehicles
2015 Acura MDX Adv; 2016 Titanium Fusion Hybrid
Occupation
retired Endodontist (root canal specialist) and Clinical Assistant Professor
Country flag
No flaming, but you really should watch some of @OutofSpecKyle videos on the Outofspec motoring Youtube channel to get a better feel for this. MOST, but not ALL of those road trip videos are with a Tesla and the Supercharge network, but some are with EA. Do what makes you comfortable, but it is not out of the realm, but I do understand that with the smaller battery that limits you more.
I agree! And as I said, buying a Tesla with their "Super Charge Network" isn't really fair and I doubt they have that network in the states we'd be traveling through anyway. ;)
 

Illinibird

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Threads
40
Messages
1,563
Reaction score
1,445
Location
Frankfort Illinois
Vehicles
2015 Acura MDX Adv; 2016 Titanium Fusion Hybrid
Occupation
retired Endodontist (root canal specialist) and Clinical Assistant Professor
Country flag
The AWD Std battery has range similar to the original Bolt (latest version is 250+ miles EPA).

Plenty of people make long range trips in that (and the Mach-E would be MUCH more comfortable to take the trip in vs a Bolt! LOL).

We have and haven't: We've taken 800+ road trips with the Bolt but its been on a dolly and not moving itself so I guess that doesn't count.

I do take the Bolt all over town and have done a trip or two "beyond" range where I needed a charge to at least make it back home.
Once again, I agree with you and feel the same way about my MME and how we'll use it. The "plenty of other people" probably are much younger and more adventuresome than my wife and me.
Sponsored

 
 




Top