EVmodeler
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Doug
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2020
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 121
- Reaction score
- 287
- Location
- SW Virginia
- Vehicles
- Mach-E AWD ER IB Job 1
- Occupation
- Engr Prof emeritus
- Thread starter
- #1
The GT and GT PE are not yet listed on fueleconomy.gov (which is unusual since they are being sold).
Can someone post a window sticker for each model?
Both models are listed in the Aug 25 release of the EPA 2021 test car list data
https://www.epa.gov/compliance-and-fuel-economy-data/data-cars-used-testing-fuel-economy
but the GT "base" model MPGe listed appears to be AC kWh/100 mi and not MPGe;
26.2 city and 30.5 hwy taken as AC kWh/100 mi converts to 128.6 MPGe city and 110.5 MPGE hwy (a little better than PE, so seems to make sense).
The GT PE data appears to be correct: 125.8 MPGe city, 107.6 MPGe hwy.
Note that all of the test car list data are unadjusted dyno test results, while the label and fueleconomy.gov numbers are adjusted.
Can someone post a window sticker for each model?
Both models are listed in the Aug 25 release of the EPA 2021 test car list data
https://www.epa.gov/compliance-and-fuel-economy-data/data-cars-used-testing-fuel-economy
but the GT "base" model MPGe listed appears to be AC kWh/100 mi and not MPGe;
26.2 city and 30.5 hwy taken as AC kWh/100 mi converts to 128.6 MPGe city and 110.5 MPGE hwy (a little better than PE, so seems to make sense).
The GT PE data appears to be correct: 125.8 MPGe city, 107.6 MPGe hwy.
Note that all of the test car list data are unadjusted dyno test results, while the label and fueleconomy.gov numbers are adjusted.
Sponsored
Last edited: