Blue highway

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Oct 15, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
369
Reaction score
426
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Mach E Premium SR RWD
Country flag
It looks like Ford is switching to LFP batteries including for F150 Lightning and Mach-E

CEO Jim Farley just revealed this during the recent Ford Q1 earnings call:​

“We’ve been working on LFP for quite some time, so let’s just leave it at that,” Farley said. “What I mean by that is, engineering LFP solutions in our first generation of products (Lightning and Mach-E), something that we see as a big opportunity and to move quickly.”

 

jason330i

Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2022
Threads
0
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
Location
Los Angeles
Vehicles
MachE
Interesting. I wonder if this will only be for the standard range battery. Or will they somehow provide the same extended range with LFP.
 
OP
OP
Blue highway

Blue highway

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Oct 15, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
369
Reaction score
426
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Mach E Premium SR RWD
Country flag
There are a range of pros and cons to this off the top of my head.

Pros
Lower cost
Many more charge cycles
Can charge to 100% all the time with no degradation
Tolerates being "fully discharged" better than other chemistries

Cons
less range for the same weight
more weight (thus worse performance) for same range
more space for same range
 

bshaw

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 18, 2020
Threads
5
Messages
345
Reaction score
382
Location
Boston, MA
Vehicles
2021 Mustang Mach E 4X (Job 1)
Country flag
I’m guessing this chemistry allows them to use fewer rare earth metals that are in short supply and very expensive right now?
Since EV manufacturing capacity is basically constrained by battery supply right now, makes sense to switch, even with the trade offs mentioned above.
 
OP
OP
Blue highway

Blue highway

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Oct 15, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
369
Reaction score
426
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Mach E Premium SR RWD
Country flag
I’m guessing this chemistry allows them to use fewer rare earth metals that are in short supply and very expensive right now?
Since EV manufacturing capacity is basically constrained by battery supply right now, makes sense to switch, even with the trade offs mentioned above.
yep that is the play.
 

voxel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Nelson
Joined
Sep 6, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
563
Reaction score
447
Location
Altamonte Springs, FL
Vehicles
Telluride SX and Model Y LR
Occupation
Software Engineer
Country flag
There are a range of pros and cons to this off the top of my head.

Pros
Lower cost
Many more charge cycles
Can charge to 100% all the time with no degradation
Tolerates being "fully discharged" better than other chemistries


Cons
less range for the same weight
more weight (thus worse performance) for same range
more space for same range

Not entirely true. No lithium-ion battery likes to be left at 100% and none like being fully discharged.

Telsa recommends charging to 100% at least once a week to calibrate the BMS since LFP batteries have flat discharge voltage curves.

LFP are less prone to fires because of a higher flashpoint.

The big cons: damage when charging at freezing temps and poor discharge performance at the same low temps. LFP EVs will need some resistive battery heater and will generally perform even worse (efficiency, etc) in sub freezing temps.

The big reason carmakers are moving to LFPs is simply cost. Nickel and cobalt costs have skyrocketed.
 

evfinder

Active Member
First Name
Noel
Joined
Jan 22, 2021
Threads
3
Messages
26
Reaction score
9
Location
Van Nuys, CA
Vehicles
2012 Toyota Prius Plug-in
Country flag
The big thing here is using Iron in place of Nickle which reduces cost. Tesla is also including LFP in its battery mix.
 

nvabill

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
567
Reaction score
497
Location
Virginia Beach, Va.
Vehicles
F-150, '22 California Route 1
Country flag
Does this allow them to lift the 5 second full throttle limit on the GTs in favor of no power cut off?
Yes, all new GT's equipped with LFP batteries will have no 5 second full power restriction.
 

Cherlin

Well-Known Member
First Name
Daniel
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
7
Messages
54
Reaction score
188
Location
United States, CA
Vehicles
2017 Focus RS , Premium EX4, 22' M3 SR+, R1T Order
Occupation
Electric Utilities - Management
Country flag
Yes, all new GT's equipped with LFP batteries will have no 5 second full power restriction.
do you have a source for that? I would be very surprised to even see LFP batteries in a GT as they tend to not get used in performance applications.
 

EELinneman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
May 4, 2021
Threads
82
Messages
995
Reaction score
1,586
Location
Littleton, CO
Vehicles
Mustang Mach-E GT Performance Edition
Occupation
Cloud Evangelist - Buchanan Technologies
Country flag
do you have a source for that? I would be very surprised to even see LFP batteries in a GT as they tend to not get used in performance applications.
I think this makes sense for the F-150 and the transit vans, but not for the MME. Supply chain is dictating these decisions and will for quite a while.
 
OP
OP
Blue highway

Blue highway

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Oct 15, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
369
Reaction score
426
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
Mach E Premium SR RWD
Country flag
Does this allow them to lift the 5 second full throttle limit on the GTs in favor of no power cut off?
We don't really know the reasons behind the 5 second rule... Ford could have decided they needed to protect the batteries, could be thermally protecting the motor controller, could be just trying to stay out of the headlines when someone crashes one...

However, LFP is unlikely to help if battery limitation is the issue.
 

nvabill

Well-Known Member
First Name
Bill
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
567
Reaction score
497
Location
Virginia Beach, Va.
Vehicles
F-150, '22 California Route 1
Country flag
do you have a source for that? I would be very surprised to even see LFP batteries in a GT as they tend to not get used in performance applications.
No, just a guess on my part but what do I know.
 

Pushrods&Capacitors

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Jun 24, 2021
Threads
20
Messages
1,153
Reaction score
2,240
Location
Round Rock, TX
Vehicles
‘21 4X, ‘14 SS Sedan tuned, ‘17 WRX tuned
Occupation
Analyst
Country flag
Does this allow them to lift the 5 second full throttle limit on the GTs in favor of no power cut off?
That’s a negative Ghostrider, your 5 second pattern is full!

AEEAA7BC-D2B3-429F-8DE4-A1379BFD3E3E.jpeg
 

Electric Goat

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 31, 2021
Threads
5
Messages
305
Reaction score
501
Location
Twin Cities, MN
Vehicles
Mach-E GT
Country flag
do you have a source for that? I would be very surprised to even see LFP batteries in a GT as they tend to not get used in performance applications.
We don't really know the reasons behind the 5 second rule... Ford could have decided they needed to protect the batteries, could be thermally protecting the motor controller, could be just trying to stay out of the headlines when someone crashes one...

However, LFP is unlikely to help if battery limitation is the issue.

Yeah, based on the 2 minutes of research that I just did on LFP, switching to LFP appears that it could hurt the performance of sporty/performance oriented vehicles. 🤷‍♂️

 

 
Top