DBC
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Don
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2020
- Threads
- 8
- Messages
- 1,224
- Reaction score
- 1,428
- Location
- San Diego
- Vehicles
- Volt ELR
Well the rule in Darusmont is the rule I laid out. Per the Court: As respects income tax statutes, it long has been the practice of Congress to make them retroactive for relatively short periods so as to include profits from transactions consummated while the statute was in process of enactment.I don’t think that’s at all clear from the Constitution or case law. And U.S. v Darusmont held that it is not unconstitutional to make a tax change retroactive to the beginning of the year in which a law was enacted. If Congress decides they want my $7,500, they can probably take it, regardless of whether that would be grossly unfair. And this Congress wants to extract a lot more money from the American economy. I’m not saying it’s going to happen. I’m saying it could happen, and I’m a little concerned. January 2022 can’t get here soon enough.
On the other hand, it is likewise clear that it would violate the Due Process Clause if Congress enacted a tax provision to encourage a behavior and then changed it after the taxpayer had engaged in the behavior being encouraged. See United States v. Carlton. This prohibition would exactly fit the case of the EV tax credit.
In any event it's not happening so neither you nor anyone else needs lose sleep over it.
Sponsored