WNKent
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Kent
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2021
- Threads
- 19
- Messages
- 519
- Reaction score
- 261
- Location
- Santa Clara, CA
- Vehicles
- MME CR1 4X
- Occupation
- Airline
I'm not crucifying him at all, in fact I said to him in this thread that I wished that I went to his dealership, but perhaps you missed that. I was speaking about this process and that no one seems to know what they are doing, but maybe you have missed those complaints in this forum too. There's no reason that the dealership wouldn't be reimbursed, unless the dealership messes something up, which is really a training issue and that's not anyone's fault, except for the management team, of each dealership. There's no conspiracy theory here.You are also conveniently omitting (or are unaware of) the fact that Ford corporate themselves have put out a memo stating that the post-sale check method is valid. Seems you're directing a lot of anger towards @Gloff as if he's the administrator of the price protection process. I would prefer to have price protection up front (as opposed to post-sale check), but I also agree with his assessment (and @ARK's) that they don't want to be giving away thousands of dollars in the event that a couple price protections don't get reimbursed. It's not dissimilar to the idea that we want the price protection up front because we're not convinced the dealer will pass it on to us - just switch the parties.
Seems odd to crucify him when he's come on here to provide information to us and has openly stated that his dealership is actually trying to get Ford to change the process because they understand how anti-consumer it is. Your issue is with Ford corporate and seems like his dealership is actually advocating on our behalf.
Sponsored