So you're saying the implied meaning of "cruise control" and "full self driving" are the same? And you're going to put the concerted effort by big oil to bury their own scientist's work from the 60's on the car makers?
I absolutely agree there - electric cars are only part of the solution. Here in NJ the contribution to GHG from transportation is actually higher, and PSE&G in NJ actually generates a lot of electricity from nuclear and renewables - but nationwide your point is spot on.
What exit? I grew up in Scotch Plains and moved to Stirling by Watchug, Basking Ridge.
see, this is why duplicate threads are bad. Because I predicted the "BUT FORD!" defense in the original thread and showed how it was completely irrelevant.
Bingo. You hit the nail on the head. The Democrats are furious with tesla and will do anything to destroy the company at this point. It’s 100% about politics. Look at all the things that Elon musk has done the push the buttons of the left:
holy crap, this thread is bringing out the Qrazies.
Am I wrong? Tesla wasn’t invited to the EV summit and Psaki, when asked about it, said he it was because tesla didn’t support the UAW.
Are you talking about this rocket scientist who set his RV on cruise control, then got up to make coffee. Now, I count coffee as my last vice in life, but it really takes a room-temperature IQ to be this stupid behind the wheel!
Florida man. I think that's all that needs to be said. ? ?
And....there is Florida woman too
Mining the Lithium creates just as much 21 billion gallons of fuel per year for appox250,000 car batteries it is robing peter to pay paulAccording to the EPA, the largest emitters of greenhouse gas in the US are (2015):
A few of those sectors will much harder to solve than switching Americans to EVs. This shows the enormity of the problem, and, that moving a reluctant nation to EVs isn't much of a solution and may worsen 'Electricity and Heat' to some degree.
