MachEUser
Well-Known Member
I think Tesla will ultimately open its network via some Tesla to CCS adapter that it sells for like $1000. The adapter could connect via Bluetooth on an app on the phone maybe and enable charging / allow billing. We may actually see a CCS to Tesla adapter first to allow Tesla to use EA and other fast chargers.I agree. The closed network is one reason I would never buy a TSLA. You are at their mercy, witness the the delete of radar. All those thousands of folks have no choice, there goes their radar. If they want the charge network they now drive a car more primitive that a 1991 BMW.
One thing EA demonstrated is that any reasonably organized group can built a charging network. So several groups have raised money to fill in the gaps to duplicate EA. As with all things TSLA, just give them time and they will screw their charge network folks. Their charge network hemorrhages money esp. as Mr Musk promised free charging for life to way too many folks. As with all other TSLA 'cost cutting' improvements, cost cutting will come to the charge network as well and its not going to go well. Right now it is coasting under benign neglect, while TSLA is hopelessly distracted with self driving.
If that EV charger bill is passed I wonder if TSLA will be forced to switch to CCS-1 and open their network in exchange for cash. Even DC politicians won't be dumb enough to give them free money for a proprietary network. If it is going to be money only for an open network I can see EA doubling and tripling in size to fill all the gaps the Federal round 1-5 charging corridor maps displayed so far.
The TSLA network is great if you don't have any competition and folks are willing to ignore the convenience of the gas station network. What is going to kill TSLA is that they never fleshed out the network to cover the 90% of of the population for local travel. Its a great network if you are blasting through town but not for much else.
I see Tesla chargers sitting empty all the time and if they can monetize it, I'm sure they will think hard about it once the Wall Street hype passes and they need more revenue and higher-margin businesses. Maybe they would even charge a higher kw/h rate for non-tesla users.
Govt EV Charger subsidies and retailers/businesses offering real estate may also require some openness in the future. These chargers have a high fixed capital expense and if they can get more revenue out of it I think they should think about how to open it up as long as it doesn't hurt their current customers and/or dilute their brand.
Ironically as there are more non-Tesla fast EV chargers, the appeal of Tesla superchargers will decline and exclusivity they seek to protect may not be all that important.
Sponsored