Confirmation bias is strong in this one.
He owns a Model 3. He pays ZERO attention to the fact that all of the EPA ratings for the Teslas are bogus. A recent Car & Driver test found that Teslas got only 71-78% of their EPA ratings. The Mach-E got 93%. He picks-and-chooses only the stats that help Tesla. He gives no importance to appearance, thereby ignoring what just about everyone thinks...that Teslas are bland and boring-looking.
I think the actual locations of the the non telsa chargers is getting there the problem is the actual number of charges at the locations when compared to tesla. However I also feel this is going to be one of those things that in time just turns into a myth that will get spouted for years to come long after that advantage has ceased to exist.I agree with most of his points - except:
- While Tesla works well because Tesla controls the whole ecosystem, that also means that Tesla can raise the supercharger prices any time they want and there's nothing a Tesla owner can do about it.
- He also seems a little bit harsh on the new-to-the-EV sphere companies for not having a "complete" solution at product launch. He seems to forget how incomplete the Tesla supercharger availability was for a very long time (unless you lived in southern california), and the model 3 launch was "production hell" for almost a year before they got things straightened out and actually started finishing putting cars together completely