mkhuffman
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2020
- Threads
- 26
- Messages
- 6,532
- Reaction score
- 8,680
- Location
- Virginia
- Vehicles
- 2021 MME GT, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
This is true for a frictionless surface with only a single motion vector, but mass still matters on real-world vehicles. All accelerations (including turning, bumpy roads, passing, changing lanes, etc) involve mass and they're all linearly dependent on mass.
Proof:yes mass does matter for all accelerations.... that's why I said 'pretty much'. for instance on a bumpy road, acceleration up and down would take energy, but only change if the 'sprung weight' of wheels and suspension changed.
energy required to move the car at a steady state speed on the highway won't change much with added mass unless tires flex more and heat up.... hardly measurable
energy required to go up a mountain would increase as a % of added weight as potential energy required to lift the added mass , but 'almost' recover the potential energy coming down.
energy required to accelerate from a stop (or in any direction) would increase as a function of added mass to total mass until steady state speed is achieved. adding or subtracting 50#/4800# is going to be hard to measure on a trip when MOST of the time is relatively steady state velocity.
steady state velocity will have MUCH more effect than +/- cargo load on a road trip since drag on the (unchanged) frontal area increases as a square of velocity.
Weight only impacts acceleration resistance.
Sponsored