Kevin P
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2020
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 436
- Reaction score
- 707
- Location
- Burlington, KY, US
- Vehicles
- '21 MMEGT - sold, '23 BMW i4 M50, various others
- Occupation
- IT
They need some OS changes before I would consider getting back in a GT. And it would require zero hardware... Number one would be to be able to set a global max charge that is editable easily and not have it dependent on location, which doesn't work consistently for a lot of MME owners. Second thing they need to fix, in the GT specifically, is the laughably bad ride in the rear seats. Well, second thing on my 21 would have been the 5-sec deal but that is now resolved. If those three things hadn't been an issue with my 21, I would still have it.
Concerning the GT-nose on the Premium, that has been typical ICE Mustang practice forever, including when the 2013 GT introduced a very similar front-end to the 2010-2012 GT500s. Even way before that, with Fox-body Mustangs, near the end of the cycle you could get what were previously 5.0-only wheels on the 4 cylinders.
Concerning the GT-nose on the Premium, that has been typical ICE Mustang practice forever, including when the 2013 GT introduced a very similar front-end to the 2010-2012 GT500s. Even way before that, with Fox-body Mustangs, near the end of the cycle you could get what were previously 5.0-only wheels on the 4 cylinders.
Sponsored