dearbornjim
Active Member
- First Name
- jim
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2025
- Threads
- 8
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 23
- Location
- Novato, CA
- Vehicles
- mach-e
- Thread starter
- #1
I know there have been other posts on this, but since I just picked up my new 2025 I thought I would weigh in. Ready for my input?
OMG, what a POS! I can't believe this is the cargo cover they are still using after four years of people complaining about it. They ought to be embarrassed. I've had about a dozen previous cars with cargo covers. Some were better or worse than others, but every single one of them was so much better than this one that there is no comparison. If I rated all my previous covers from 1 to 10 I would now have to raise the 1's and 2's up to 5 or 6 to leave a big enough gap between previous worst and this one. I know containing cost is important, but there has to be a better way to design a carg cover than this.
OMG, what a POS! I can't believe this is the cargo cover they are still using after four years of people complaining about it. They ought to be embarrassed. I've had about a dozen previous cars with cargo covers. Some were better or worse than others, but every single one of them was so much better than this one that there is no comparison. If I rated all my previous covers from 1 to 10 I would now have to raise the 1's and 2's up to 5 or 6 to leave a big enough gap between previous worst and this one. I know containing cost is important, but there has to be a better way to design a carg cover than this.
Sponsored
