Is the Rally the “…most powerful…” Mustang Mach-E

[Jimrpa]

On the Ford website, they claim “Three cheers for the most powerful and versatile model in the lineup” (emphasis added). Is this true? I thought the Rally and the GT Performance Edition (or whatever the name is this week) had the same drivetrain and performance specs?

Sponsored

 

[dan_meh]

The rear spoiler (wing?) adds 10% more power! For real, tho, the Rally is the most powerful because it’s a GT. It’s just a package.

 

[ack154]

It's probably just that the Rally basically comes with the performance upgrade already, vs it being an option on the GT.

 

[Jimrpa]

Makes sense. I couldn’t imagine that there’s any way to make the Rally “more powerful” without changing the drivetrain.

 

[DeltaDelta]

[most powerful] and versatile
no, it's the same as a gtpu, but with a wing and different suspension

most [powerful and versatile]
Yes, because of suspension and other off road pluses

 

[Jimrpa]

[most powerful] and versatile
no, it's the same as a gtpu, but with a wing and different suspension

most [powerful and versatile]
Yes, because of suspension and other off road pluses

Not sure I follow? “And” means both clauses have to be true?

 

[ChrisO]

Not sure I follow? “And” means both clauses have to be true?

That is the way I would read it, both have to be true. In that case I would think the Rally does win out over the GT with the performance package because it is setup for off roading.

 

[Jimrpa]

That is the way I would read it, both have to be true. In that case I would think the Rally does win out over the GT with the performance package because it is setup for off roading.

But “most powerful” would not be true. At best, “equally powerful” would be true.

 

[phil]

But “most powerful” would not be true.

Sure it's true. Rally and GT are both the "most powerful" versions. No other version is more powerful.

 

[E90alex]

It has the most power as standard. Performance upgrade on the GT is optional.

 

[Mach1E]

But “most powerful” would not be true. At best, “equally powerful” would be true.

If that statement gets you going, how do you feel when a company claims a product is “new AND improved?”

How can it be both?!?

 

[ChasingCoral]

Not sure I follow? “And” means both clauses have to be true?

Not necessarily. English is strange that way. @DeltaDelta got it right.

While the transitive property holds in math, it doesn't necessarily hold in logic or real life.
https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck...Exploration,) for several different reasons.”

 

[Jimrpa]

Not necessarily. English is strange that way. @DeltaDelta got it right.

While the transitive property holds in math, it doesn't necessarily hold in logic or real life.
https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-basic-geometry-concepts/section/2.6/related/rwa/properties-of-equality-and-congruence/#:~:text=Student Exploration,) for several different reasons.”

In a past life, in a galaxy far, far away, I was a Systems Engineer. You can bet that when I was reviewing other people’s poorly written requirements, “and” was treated as the “logical and”, not the “Shakespearean and”

 

[ChasingCoral]

In a past life, in a galaxy far, far away, I was a Systems Engineer. You can bet that when I was reviewing other people’s poorly written requirements, “and” was treated as the “logical and”, not the “Shakespearean and”

There’sa big difference between engineering and marketing writing. The former strives for accuracy. The latter strives for sales.

 

[Jimrpa]

There’sa big difference between engineering and marketing writing. The former strives for accuracy. The latter strives for sales.

Absolutely! Sadly, after many years of being a so-called “leader”, a couple of neurons are stubbornly hanging on

Sponsored