Mach-Lee, you indicated that the doors have backup power so they can be opened with two presses if the 12V battery dies, assuming the car was unlocked before the battery died. Does that also apply to the liftgate?
Thanks for the clarification, good to know it wasn't the new part that failed. I know that some of the early recall replacements used the old remanufactured part (NK4Z-10C666-CRM for your car). I would suggest making sure you get the new part # NK4Z-10C666-E. Good luck!
Wait, are you saying that your recall HVBJB part failed? If so, that is the first I have heard of that happening. Your AWD Premium should have received HVBJB Part # NK4Z-10C666-E; was that the part # they installed and then failed one month later? Can you give us the details of the failure...
My '22 GT had the HVBJB recall replacement done last month. Before the replacement my HVB SOH was 97.5%. I just checked it again today with my Veepeak OBD II tool with Car Scanner and it is now 92.5%. Why would it drop 5% after the HVBJB replacement? 7.5% battery degradation seems pretty...
I have a similar issue with a mismatch between my battery charger SoC and my Ford account SoC. I bought a new Pro-Logix PL2310 charger and put it on my '22 Mach e GT yesterday. It reached 100% SOC at 12.8v in about 6 hours, and is still reading those values now after 24 hours with the charger...
Yes, F is the new part for your car. The old remanufactured part for your car would have been DRM. Good to see non-GT's are starting to get the new part.
If I were you, I would confirm that you are getting the new HVBJB part from the dealer before getting the recall done. Several forum members with non-GT cars are getting old versions of the HVBJB installed because apparently the non-GT parts are not yet fully available. Some on here have said...
Yes, the -C part for your car was first introduced in May of 2022 as the second version of the HVBJB after the pre-May 2022 HVBJB's were determined to fail at an unacceptable rate. The -CRM version you just received is effectively the same as the improved -C version, except they used the core...
Interesting. NK4Z-10C666-CRM is the old remanufactured part for the AWD non-GT. It still seems like the new parts for non-GTs are not yet available for either recall or repairs. We're not sure what the differences are, but it seems odd Ford is still using these older parts.
I have heard the clicking sounds on occasion, but heard other strange sounds yesterday when I plugged in to my GT from my Juicebox 40 running at 12 amps. It sounded like fluids flushing through the car's cooling/heating system as the charging began. The car was charging as normal, but the...
Just got my '22 GT back yesterday after the dealer completed recall 23S56 and 23B50. A short summary:
-12/19: Called dealer and said I needed recall. Dealer said I need to bring car in for inspection. I said no I don't. They said they would look into it and call me back.
-12/20: Dealer...
The text box was present in my Vehicle Dashboard and I clicked on it and successfully enrolled. But then the text box disappeared and is no longer in my Vehicle Dashboard, even after I logged out and logged back in. What am I missing?
I see the HVBJB part number as NK4Z-10C666-CRM, which is the remanufactured old version for non-GT AWD versions from TSB 23-2257 published in August 2023. So again we see here that a failed HVBJB is being replaced with an old version of the part, not the new versions that are apparently only...
Strange. TSB 23-2348 from November 2023 doesn't list the -BRM part for the GT, it lists the -B part, so not the remanufactured part. You have to go all the way back to TSB 23-2257 from August 2023 where the -BRM part is listed. If Ford is forcing you to take a two versions old remanufactured...