Rex
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Rex
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2021
- Threads
- 22
- Messages
- 140
- Reaction score
- 64
- Location
- Dorset
- Vehicles
- Mach-E Premium AWD 2024
- Occupation
- retired
- Thread starter
- #1
In order to investigate why my charge efficiency in my new Mach E exceeds 100%, I did an experiment.
I get more charge into the battery according to the % added to the battery in FP if I assume the specified battery capacity than comes out of the wall box.
My previous Mach E was almost always less than 100%, roughly 95% which is what I would guess at.
Given Ford haven't invented a perpetual motion machine I wanted to investigate further.
I realised that the integral over a reasonable journey of miles/kWh would provide a Charlier's Check of battery percentage vs kWh.
So I made a video of the miles/kWh display in the car on a journey and integrated the readings.
I got an interesting result which I shall check on further journeys.
However it was very apparent some readings don't occur.
The initial readings were from the start and it fairly rapidly approached the 3 area but would flick back and forth between 2.8 and 3.0, 3.1 and 3.3.
The car display spent a long time flicking back and forth between 3.1 and 3.3.
So does the arithmetic in the car not support 2.9 and 3.2 miles/kWhr and possibly other numbers?
Measuring miles is pretty easy and so is kWh so there should not be a digitisation error.
Anyone noticed anything similar?
Is this just my car or others experiencing missing numbers?
I get more charge into the battery according to the % added to the battery in FP if I assume the specified battery capacity than comes out of the wall box.
My previous Mach E was almost always less than 100%, roughly 95% which is what I would guess at.
Given Ford haven't invented a perpetual motion machine I wanted to investigate further.
I realised that the integral over a reasonable journey of miles/kWh would provide a Charlier's Check of battery percentage vs kWh.
So I made a video of the miles/kWh display in the car on a journey and integrated the readings.
I got an interesting result which I shall check on further journeys.
However it was very apparent some readings don't occur.
The initial readings were from the start and it fairly rapidly approached the 3 area but would flick back and forth between 2.8 and 3.0, 3.1 and 3.3.
The car display spent a long time flicking back and forth between 3.1 and 3.3.
So does the arithmetic in the car not support 2.9 and 3.2 miles/kWhr and possibly other numbers?
Measuring miles is pretty easy and so is kWh so there should not be a digitisation error.
Anyone noticed anything similar?
Is this just my car or others experiencing missing numbers?
Sponsored