Stupid Physics Question

MW1515

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
181
Reaction score
220
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
2022 Mach E Premium AWD
Country flag
There's also research being done on e-fuel by Porsche and a Canadian company that makes fuel from air both of which would take all existing ICE vehicles and make them burn carbon neutral fuels. Additionally, there's also things like the zero emission turbine engines which are being worked on. Unfortunately, people are stuck on electricity, batteries and solar as the great savior. It's sad that so many people have electrical tunnel vision. People need to wake up to all alternatives.

Solar is becoming the "nuclear waste" of our time (recent article). Solving atmospheric problems with more toxic ground problems isn't a win in my books.
I'm TOTALLY open to any new technology that lessens the impact humans are having on our planet. Right now IMO batteries are a much better option than gas for cars, and those are the 2 real world options we have now. If that air fuel car is ready by the time i buy my next car ill get it. šŸ˜Ž My point is that comparing the 2 right now is not really fair since ICE for cars have been in development for 100 years and the development of batteries for transportation is still in its infancy. The few advantages that gas has now (density, convenience, etc) could be mostly gone in 20 years.

Recycling of solar panels and batteries is also an industry that is still in its infancy so I think its very premature to assume that solar inevitably leads to toxic waste piling up at the dump.

The amount of solar energy that hits the US every hour is enough to power the country for a year so there is obviously a ton of untapped potential out there.
Sponsored

 

jgcom

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Threads
8
Messages
204
Reaction score
289
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
Mach-E 4X premium, '21
Occupation
Physics prof.
Country flag
I'm a physics prof., and I answered a similar question last year, before I got my car:

https://www.macheforum.com/site/thr...eries-heavier-than-dead-ones.6116/post-174554

If you read my old post carefully, you will note that the effect is minuscule, would be difficult to measure, but is real. Also, note that other uninteresting effects (gas venting and thermally-induced buoyancy changes during charging) might well be larger. Some people reply by saying that E=mc^2 only applies to nuclear energy. They are incorrect.

Joe
 

timbop

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Threads
63
Messages
6,729
Reaction score
13,758
Location
New Jersey
Vehicles
Solar powered 2021 MME ER RWD & 2022 Corsair PHEV
Occupation
Software Engineer
Country flag
But the density does relate to range
They are related in that the lower energy dense battery needs to have more mass to get to the same range. That is NOT the same thing as efficiency, which has to do with how much energy is WASTED during the process of converting potential to kinetic energy.

The energy density relates to how big your "fuel tank" has to be to reach a certain range, and of course the more fuel you're carrying your efficiency goes down. In the case of a BEV it is so much more fuel efficient even the ungodly heavy hummer ev has better fuel efficiency than a gas engine.
 

timbop

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Threads
63
Messages
6,729
Reaction score
13,758
Location
New Jersey
Vehicles
Solar powered 2021 MME ER RWD & 2022 Corsair PHEV
Occupation
Software Engineer
Country flag
Modern solar panels are already extremely efficient.
No, they are extremely INEFFICIENT relative to the amount of energy that hits their surface area. They only react to to a small portion of the spectrum (the yellow/red range), giving the best panels roughly 25% efficiency. The holy grail of solar panels is finding a material that can convert a much wider span of the spectrum into electrical energy.
 

DYohn

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Jul 3, 2021
Threads
24
Messages
1,078
Reaction score
1,831
Location
Valley of the Sun
Vehicles
2021 Mach E Premium Ex
Country flag
All I know is the empty bottle of V8 juice I keep in my frunk is there for smart-asses who ask "what's under the hood," and as long as it remains empty, if it rolls around any changes to vehicle weight or performance dynamics are most likely on the quantum scale.
 


ctenidae

Well-Known Member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
33
Messages
1,348
Reaction score
1,788
Location
Stamford, CT
Vehicles
DMG GT; Taycan, Q7, Sienna Hybrid
Occupation
Solver of problems
Country flag
All I know is the empty bottle of V8 juice I keep in my frunk is there for smart-asses who ask "what's under the hood," and as long as it remains empty, if it rolls around any changes to vehicle weight or performance dynamics are most likely on the quantum scale.
What's under there?
A V8
 

ctenidae

Well-Known Member
First Name
Alex
Joined
Jan 19, 2022
Threads
33
Messages
1,348
Reaction score
1,788
Location
Stamford, CT
Vehicles
DMG GT; Taycan, Q7, Sienna Hybrid
Occupation
Solver of problems
Country flag
Also, to all the folks who "hate regen" and bemoan the lack of the ability to coast, note the conversation re: wasted energy and converting kinetic energy to heat.
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
76
Messages
7,719
Reaction score
9,602
Location
Florida
Vehicles
Mach 1, Chevy SS-sold, GTPE delivered oct 2021
Country flag
No, they are extremely INEFFICIENT relative to the amount of energy that hits their surface area. They only react to to a small portion of the spectrum (the yellow/red range), giving the best panels roughly 25% efficiency. The holy grail of solar panels is finding a material that can convert a much wider span of the spectrum into electrical energy.
Thatā€™s where we disagree.

I think being able to convert 30% roughly to electricity is very good.

The ā€œholy grailā€ as you put it may never exist. So my point is that we may be as ā€œefficient as reasonably possibleā€ with solar or close to it.

But either way, it doesnā€™t change my argument. Even if you find the holy grail, itā€™s just not enough energy to move us around.

Solar panels on competitor BEVs add 1 mile of range a day (when itā€™s sunny).

So triple that and you get 3 miles/day. Not gonna cut it.
 

MW1515

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
181
Reaction score
220
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
2022 Mach E Premium AWD
Country flag

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
76
Messages
7,719
Reaction score
9,602
Location
Florida
Vehicles
Mach 1, Chevy SS-sold, GTPE delivered oct 2021
Country flag
I'm TOTALLY open to any new technology that lessens the impact humans are having on our planet. Right now IMO batteries are a much better option than gas for cars, and those are the 2 real world options we have now. If that air fuel car is ready by the time i buy my next car ill get it. šŸ˜Ž My point is that comparing the 2 right now is not really fair since ICE for cars have been in development for 100 years and the development of batteries for transportation is still in its infancy. The few advantages that gas has now (density, convenience, etc) could be mostly gone in 20 years.

Recycling of solar panels and batteries is also an industry that is still in its infancy so I think its very premature to assume that solar inevitably leads to toxic waste piling up at the dump.

The amount of solar energy that hits the US every hour is enough to power the country for a year so there is obviously a ton of untapped potential out there.
Battery tech and solar panels arenā€™t even remotely close to their ā€œinfancy.ā€

One could even argue we have spent way more trying to perfect battery tech than we have on internal combustion.

The fuel (Gasoline) has barely changed in decades. And the basics of how the engines work? The same. Crank, pistons, cam, intake, fuelā€¦ā€¦ā€¦ design is hardly different from a hundred years ago.
 

MW1515

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
181
Reaction score
220
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
2022 Mach E Premium AWD
Country flag
Thatā€™s where we disagree.

I think being able to convert 30% roughly to electricity is very good.

The ā€œholy grailā€ as you put it may never exist. So my point is that we may be as ā€œefficient as reasonably possibleā€ with solar or close to it.

But either way, it doesnā€™t change my argument. Even if you find the holy grail, itā€™s just not enough energy to move us around.

Solar panels on competitor BEVs add 1 mile of range a day (when itā€™s sunny).

So triple that and you get 3 miles/day. Not gonna cut it.
Have you heard of the Lightyear? It says it can get 70km worth of range per day sitting out in the sun, which is 43 miles. Let's say one day those panels are twice as efficient. That's 80 miles per day from sitting outside. Sure, it's crazy expensive now, but it might not be in 15 years...

https://lightyear.one/
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
76
Messages
7,719
Reaction score
9,602
Location
Florida
Vehicles
Mach 1, Chevy SS-sold, GTPE delivered oct 2021
Country flag
Have you heard of the Lightyear? It says it can get 70km worth of range per day sitting out in the sun, which is 43 miles. Let's say one day those panels are twice as efficient. That's 80 miles per day from sitting outside. Sure, it's crazy expensive now, but it might not be in 15 years...

https://lightyear.one/
Interesting. Havenā€™t heard of it, but some of their claims seem a bitā€¦ā€¦.. far fetched.

Definitely need to see some independent verification and real tests to believe it.

Seen waaaaaaaay too many tech startups in this category that make outrageous claims (to get investors to give them $$) then never deliver.

Website claims test drives started June 2022. Did it happen?

Edit: did some googling-
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a40396442/lightyear-zero-solar-ev-first-drive/

May be the only $265,000 car you donā€™t put in the garage. šŸ˜œ
 

MW1515

Well-Known Member
First Name
Matt
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
181
Reaction score
220
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
2022 Mach E Premium AWD
Country flag
Battery tech and solar panels arenā€™t even remotely close to their ā€œinfancy.ā€

One could even argue we have spent way more trying to perfect battery tech than we have on internal combustion.

The fuel (Gasoline) has barely changed in decades. And the basics of how the engines work? The same. Crank, pistons, cam, intake, fuelā€¦ā€¦ā€¦ design is hardly different from a hundred years ago.
Research on battery tech has always focused on consumer electronics, not transportation. Battery tech for transportation is still in it's infancy. It's a very different application.

You have a great point about gasoline. There is not a whole lot more efficiency to squeeze out.
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
76
Messages
7,719
Reaction score
9,602
Location
Florida
Vehicles
Mach 1, Chevy SS-sold, GTPE delivered oct 2021
Country flag
Research on battery tech has always focused on consumer electronics, not transportation. Battery tech for transportation is still in it's infancy. It's a very different application.

You have a great point about gasoline. There is not a whole lot more efficiency to squeeze out.
This just isnā€™t true. Many seem to assume that weā€™ve barely scratched the surface and some amazing breakthrough technology is just right around the corner. Thatā€™s more science fiction than science unfortunately.

Hereā€™s some good reading:

https://www.caranddriver.com/featur...-history-of-the-electric-car-1830-to-present/

Worth the Watt: A Brief History of the Electric Car, 1830 to Present
EVs weren't born yesterday.
Sponsored

 
 




Top