dml105
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2020
- Threads
- 27
- Messages
- 949
- Reaction score
- 1,421
- Location
- Arlington, VA
- Vehicles
- Shadowfax, the Star White Tricoated Metallic Pony
- Thread starter
- #1
As always, there is a lot of talk here and elsewhere about the comparisons between driving an ICE vehicle and driving an EV. The most common question I get asked is "what's the range?" While the correct answer is "greater than 99.9% of the trips I take," I usually answer with less snark:
"I get about 320 in the summer and about 175 in the winter. But you know what? I always leave the house on a full tank because I have a charging station at my house."
"Yeah, but what about when you take a trip that's longer than your range?"
This is where my current answer and my ideal answer differ. My current answer is that I have to stop at a DCFC station and wait for 30-40 minutes to charge up and continue my journey. That DCFC is usually at a Walmart or a shopping center - not exactly what I need when I'm on a long trip - but at least it's near the highway.
My ideal answer would be "well, I gotta eat and I gotta pee, and so do my wife and kids. So we pull into McDonalds, or Cracker Barrel or whatever, and my car eats at the same time."
While I love the idea of DCFC at every couple of exits along the interstate system, charging at 350kW, it will still be a long pause where you can't do much of anything else. I think Americans would find it more convenient to put chargers where people are going to stop anyway - the restaurants. A sit down restaurant where people will tend to stay for more than an hour could get away with less expensive 100 kW or even 50 kW charging stations. They could even put the charge right there on the bill. The Ohio Turnpike has EA stations at their service plazas. Bring that everywhere! Put a charger at every fast food joint along the highway in the rural areas.
People seem to point to the infrastructure as a gaping hole in EV adoption. If done right, it could actually create a advantage to using EVs.
"I get about 320 in the summer and about 175 in the winter. But you know what? I always leave the house on a full tank because I have a charging station at my house."
"Yeah, but what about when you take a trip that's longer than your range?"
This is where my current answer and my ideal answer differ. My current answer is that I have to stop at a DCFC station and wait for 30-40 minutes to charge up and continue my journey. That DCFC is usually at a Walmart or a shopping center - not exactly what I need when I'm on a long trip - but at least it's near the highway.
My ideal answer would be "well, I gotta eat and I gotta pee, and so do my wife and kids. So we pull into McDonalds, or Cracker Barrel or whatever, and my car eats at the same time."
While I love the idea of DCFC at every couple of exits along the interstate system, charging at 350kW, it will still be a long pause where you can't do much of anything else. I think Americans would find it more convenient to put chargers where people are going to stop anyway - the restaurants. A sit down restaurant where people will tend to stay for more than an hour could get away with less expensive 100 kW or even 50 kW charging stations. They could even put the charge right there on the bill. The Ohio Turnpike has EA stations at their service plazas. Bring that everywhere! Put a charger at every fast food joint along the highway in the rural areas.
People seem to point to the infrastructure as a gaping hole in EV adoption. If done right, it could actually create a advantage to using EVs.
Sponsored