rcechinel
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Rod
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2021
- Threads
- 9
- Messages
- 855
- Reaction score
- 870
- Location
- Atlanta
- Vehicles
- 2022 Mach-E Premium ER AWD
- Occupation
- Tech
- Thread starter
- #121
Do you understand that, in that particular situation, no one would have quick access to any of those resources in a fast way? And there was an infant inside the car?the proper procedure is to pop the frunk with that tiny cable. Then jump the 12v to pop the door. The owner just does not know and are panicking. Smashing the window is not necessary. It is kind of stupid of ford to follow tesla design. A traditional keyhole and physical key would be better. Cost cutting being the reason as always.
I don't think it is Ford's fault or should cover it. Unfortunately for Ford, the optic is bad especially with baiting title like infant stuck in car. Better to just pay and shut the customer up.
Do you understand they called for service and that took too long?
Knowing that since the late 1990s the U.S. has seen an average of 37 children die each year from heatstroke after being unattended in a car, would you be very calm and wait for service with your baby cooking inside?
Just for curiosity, how many drivers out there know how to jump a dead battery in an ICE easy-to-locate car? Imagine in a Mach-E. It would take ME, a full nerd, several minutes IF I had a battery to jump. Obviously that breaking the window was the only life-saving attitude to be taken in the given timeframe.
A car Ford manufactured had a fault a that trapped an infant alone inside the car. Good luck telling any judge that isn't Ford's fault...
Sponsored