BlueCruise 1.5 Review - Mach-Lee

Mach-Lee

Well-Known Member
First Name
Lee
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Threads
262
Messages
11,365
Reaction score
25,025
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium AWD
Occupation
Sci/Eng
Country flag
You're probably seeing a couple of BlueCruise 1.5 reviews coming out today. Ford also gave me the opportunity to test it along with @Mach-E VLOG. I spent an hour or two with it during I-25 rush hour traffic in Colorado.

First thing to understand is that BlueCruise 1.5 is only available on 2025 models and later. There were some hardware changes (new front camera and IPMA hardware revision, I believe) to enable the new features, which means that BC 1.5 will not be backwards compatible with pre-2025 models.

The big new feature with BC 1.5 is fully automatic lane changes, which means it will do everything for you without lifting a finger. More on that later. In-lane stability and dropouts have also been improved greatly.

New UI:

Ford Mustang Mach-E BlueCruise 1.5 Review - Mach-Lee IMG_1172


The instrument cluster graphics have been redesigned for 2025. This is what hands-free mode looks like. Some things have been moved around, but it has the same functions as before. Following distance is displayed with bars in front, and the position of the car moves around with lane shifts (around semis) like before. Left and right arrows show up in Blue Zones when lane changes are available. We still only have a single lane being rendered; I would have liked to see multi-lane rendering for increased situational awareness.

Lane Stability and Curves:

The first thing I noticed is the lane centering force has been significantly improved. If you've ever driven a Tesla or Rivian, you know the steering wheel is very much "locked in" while lane centering modes are engaged—the steering wheel is hard to turn unless you force it to "break free" from lane centering (which can cause an overcorrection into the next lane). In older BC versions, it's the exact opposite. Steering is very lazy and cooperative, easy to turn. With BlueCruise 1.5, the lane centering feel is now much more of a hybrid between old BlueCruise and Tesla. You will definitely feel more resistance if you want to move the lane position over a bit to go around roadkill or a pothole, but it still lets you do that smoothly and cooperatively without disengaging. When you let go, it very quickly returns you to the center of the lane (better path calculations). It's much more immediate about it than the older versions. I actually prefer that compared to my car (a 2022 with BlueCruise 1.3).

Performance on curves is improved compared to previous versions. On the freeway, I did not notice an appreciable bias to one side of the lane or the other. It may move over slightly to the inside of the curve, but that's what most people do anyway. Lane shifts around large vehicles and semis worked as expected. The number of hands-free dropouts was also significantly reduced compared to what I see with BC 1.3. There was only one or two times during the entire drive (~70 miles) it required hands-on. So that was a welcome improvement.

On sharper curves (on lesser roads), the lane centering still had some odd behavior at the extremes. It had a tendency to overcorrect before cancelling. Definitely keep your hand on the wheel if you see a sharp curve coming up while using lane centering, or you could find yourself yeeted into the next lane during an extreme case. Expanding the operating envelope of lane centering (in terms of max steering wheel angle) is something I'd like to see in future versions. It's not bad, but could be better.

Stability through intersections with no lines was also improved. It was less likely to cancel or do something nuts when the lines disappear, but still has its limits and gets confused if you go more than a couple of seconds without lines.

Adaptive Cruise Control and Braking

Things are pretty much the same here as before. You have four following distance levels, and I prefer using distance 1 or 2 in traffic to prevent cut-ins. Braking smoothness has improved slightly compared to my car. The management of the following distance gap seems similar to older versions as well. During heavy braking, it handles it but it still gets a little close, which can be a bit disconcerting if you're not used to it. It dealt with stop-and-go traffic very well, no big complaints there. However, in the next version of BlueCruise, I would like to see some focus on braking and following distance control (especially during heavy braking from 70-20 MPH) rather than just steering improvements.

With stopped traffic, the car will still slow down and end up creeping forward to the stopped vehicle. However, one big improvement is Auto Resume now waits 30+ seconds at stop lights!

Ford Mustang Mach-E BlueCruise 1.5 Review - Mach-Lee IMG_1170


On my car, it will only wait 5 seconds outside of a Blue Zone before it timeouts (then you have to press the resume button or tap the pedal when the light turns green). It seems they've made a change to allow 30+ seconds of auto-resume globally. This was a small but very welcome change, less things to constantly pay attention to at each stop, the car just starts again on its own most of the time. I hope it's something that could be fixed in older vehicles as well, it's so much nicer to get the full 30 seconds.

Automatic Lane Changes

This is the key new feature for BlueCruise 1.5, lane changes are now fully automated. If the left lane is clear and you're approaching a slower vehicle, you will see the following prompt before the car moves over all by itself. Notice the distance to the vehicle, it starts plenty early:

Ford Mustang Mach-E BlueCruise 1.5 Review - Mach-Lee IMG_1178


Car moves over, you go by the slower vehicle, then afterwards if the lane is clear you'll see this:

Ford Mustang Mach-E BlueCruise 1.5 Review - Mach-Lee IMG_1174


Of course, you can also initiate the lane change yourself at any time by tapping the turn signal stalk. If there are two lanes, the automatic lane change will want to keep you in the right lane, and if there are three lanes, it will want to keep you in the middle lane. It will only pass vehicles on the left, never on the right side. So if you get in a left lane hog situation, you'll have to change manually to pass on the right.

The lane change logic was extremely smart and avoided unnecessary lane changes. If there was any kind of slower vehicle up ahead in the right lane, it would wait to move back over. The distance it was looking ahead before moving over seemed incredible, beyond radar range, so I'm guessing it's using the camera to look for vehicles in the adjacent lane as well as radar? If anything, it was almost too conservative about getting back over, but I prefer it that way to avoid having to change lanes again in a short time. That or else the lane changes were inhibited by following a vehicle in front of me (which is often the case in rush hour traffic).

Unfortunately, lane changes are only for slower vehicles and not tied to navigation (like Tesla Navigate on Autopilot), so if you have an exit coming up, you will have to manually maneuver. The only time the automatic lane change gets annoying is if you're in an exit lane, and it decides to move you left out of the exit lane. Perhaps they could add logic to disable auto changes when you're in an exit-only lane, or when you are less than 1 mile to an exit in the active navigation.

Overall, I think the automatic lane change feature was very well done; it made a very pleasing driving experience of "set it and forget it". I could see going for many dozens of miles without lifting a finger using BlueCruise 1.5. We have arrived at the final frontier of sit there and do nothing (but watch).

Desired Improvements

There is still an 80 MPH speed limit on hands-free BlueCruise. In many states with 75+ MPH speed limits, people often drive 85 MPH or more. I would like to see the speed threshold raised to at least 85 MPH.

The coverage of hands-free Blue Cruise has still not expanded (especially in Canada), and is limited to protected access freeways only. That is very unfortunate, because I believe the technology has progressed to the point that hands-free can be safely allowed on many more roads, which GM has done with Super Cruise. If you look at the coverage map, it's no comparison (130,000 miles vs. 750,000 miles):

Ford Mustang Mach-E BlueCruise 1.5 Review - Mach-Lee HF Coverage Comparsion small


I hope that Ford will do what it takes to significantly expand the coverage of hands-free BlueCruise in the near future.

Summary

Overall, BlueCruise 1.5 provides some good improvements. Lane stability is better, there are fewer dropouts, and you get fully automated lane changes. Overall performance is very good, and it's a very safe system. Hands-free is limited to mapped freeways, but the lane centering works well on the rest of the roads.

Last, I'm happy to answer any questions you might have.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

Jeff-NoVA

Well-Known Member
First Name
Jeff
Joined
Oct 21, 2023
Threads
19
Messages
696
Reaction score
1,122
Location
Northern VA
Vehicles
2022 Mustang Mach-E Premium
Country flag
I believe in the Motor Trend article they mentioned that on 1.5 the car will also move out of a passing lane if a faster vehicle is approaching from behind. Did you experience that? It seems it would require the use of some sort of rear facing camera or sensor beyond the very short range parking sensors.
 
OP
OP
Mach-Lee

Mach-Lee

Well-Known Member
First Name
Lee
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Threads
262
Messages
11,365
Reaction score
25,025
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium AWD
Occupation
Sci/Eng
Country flag
I believe in the Motor Trend article they mentioned that on 1.5 the car will also move out of a passing lane if a faster vehicle is approaching from behind. Did you experience that? It seems it would require the use of some sort of rear facing camera or sensor beyond the very short range parking sensors.
I’m not so sure about that, it wants to put you back in the right lane when it can regardless of whether there’s somebody behind you or not. But if somebody is coming up fast in the new lane WHILE you are changing lanes, it will see that and abort. It might have been they happened to notice a car coming up behind when it decided to move over, but it was going to do it regardless.

I didn’t really notice a difference related to having a car behind me or not, it moved back right with either condition.
 
Last edited:

fawzib

Active Member
First Name
Faw
Joined
Oct 3, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
25
Reaction score
19
Location
USA
Vehicles
2023 Mustang Mach-e ER Premium AWD
Sad that none of the previous years will get those updates. Makes no sense for this to be a subscription since ford doesn't update their cars after couple of years
 

tuminatr

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Apr 22, 2020
Threads
51
Messages
2,185
Reaction score
2,222
Location
Saint Paul,MN
Vehicles
2021 MME GTPE
Occupation
sales
Country flag
Thanks for the review, I bet one other hardware difference is the 2025s have a 5g modem. That new 5g modem is much faster and has less latency
 
Last edited:


Ninjaguy

Member
First Name
Cory
Joined
Aug 19, 2021
Threads
2
Messages
19
Reaction score
16
Location
Canada
Vehicles
2016 Edge Sport, 1986 944 Turbo, 2004 ZX10R, 2006
Country flag
I've been using Blue Cruise 1.5 on one of the only stretches of highway it's offered on in my region (Vancouver Island), and I'm finding it impressive! It's a shame it's not offered across the entire prairie where the roads are dead straight and flat. Here it's interesting because the stretch it works on is about 100km of divided 4-lanes, but there's one section between two exits (15km) that isn't mapped, just in the northbound lanes. The southbound route (hwy 19) works all the way through. I hope they keep expanding the ranges, and I would subscribe just for the added safety and ease of operation.
Ford got my business in 2015 after I drove with their adaptive cruise control across the mountains and prairies, and this blue cruise is a whole other level.
The lane-centering is very smooth and consistent, turns are excellent and if input might be required then it switches to hands-on adaptive cruise, the same way it does when going through major intersections, as an added safeguard.
I'm using the speed limit sign reading option and it's so cool to have the vehicle automatically adjust speeds, I find myself adding a bit of throttle through the transition zones because you don't realize how long it takes an ICE vehicle to slow down compared to the regenerative braking in the EV. I mostly drive in unbridled mode, strictly for the dynamic discharge benefits for the battery ?, and I find the speed transitions to be the most fun in this car.
I don't know if there were updates to the way the adaptive cruise control takes corners etc but I'm finding it very interesting how the Mach E slows coming into corners, I guess it's recognizing speed signs even for individual corners, I've felt very safe traveling at marked speeds in this setting as opposed to how I normally drive which tends to take corner speed as a badge of honour..
Overall I've felt very safe and impressed by the accuracy and efficiency of the 1.5 version of Blue Cruise.
 

67 Stang Convertible

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
Jan 27, 2021
Threads
51
Messages
1,691
Reaction score
2,445
Location
Georgia, USA
Vehicles
1967 Mustang, 2013 Kia Optima, 2018 Kia Sportage
Occupation
Physician
Country flag
You're probably seeing a couple of BlueCruise 1.5 reviews coming out today. Ford also gave me the opportunity to test it along with @Mach-E VLOG. I spent an hour or two with it during I-25 rush hour traffic in Colorado.

First thing to understand is that BlueCruise 1.5 is only available on 2025 models and later. There were some hardware changes (new front camera and IPMA hardware revision, I believe) to enable the new features, which means that BC 1.5 will not be backwards compatible with pre-2025 models.

The big new feature with BC 1.5 is fully automatic lane changes, which means it will do everything for you without lifting a finger. More on that later. In-lane stability and dropouts have also been improved greatly.

New UI:

IMG_1172.jpeg


The instrument cluster graphics have been redesigned for 2025. This is what hands-free mode looks like. Some things have been moved around, but it has the same functions as before. Following distance is displayed with bars in front, and the position of the car moves around with lane shifts (around semis) like before. Left and right arrows show up in Blue Zones when lane changes are available. We still only have a single lane being rendered; I would have liked to see multi-lane rendering for increased situational awareness.

Lane Stability and Curves:

The first thing I noticed is the lane centering force has been significantly improved. If you've ever driven a Tesla or Rivian, you know the steering wheel is very much "locked in" while lane centering modes are engaged—the steering wheel is hard to turn unless you force it to "break free" from lane centering (which can cause an overcorrection into the next lane). In older BC versions, it's the exact opposite. Steering is very lazy and cooperative, easy to turn. With BlueCruise 1.5, the lane centering feel is now much more of a hybrid between old BlueCruise and Tesla. You will definitely feel more resistance if you want to move the lane position over a bit to go around roadkill or a pothole, but it still lets you do that smoothly and cooperatively without disengaging. When you let go, it very quickly returns you to the center of the lane (better path calculations). It's much more immediate about it than the older versions. I actually prefer that compared to my car (a 2022 with BlueCruise 1.3).

Performance on curves is improved compared to previous versions. On the freeway, I did not notice an appreciable bias to one side of the lane or the other. It may move over slightly to the inside of the curve, but that's what most people do anyway. Lane shifts around large vehicles and semis worked as expected. The number of hands-free dropouts was also significantly reduced compared to what I see with BC 1.3. There was only one or two times during the entire drive (~70 miles) it required hands-on. So that was a welcome improvement.

On sharper curves (on lesser roads), the lane centering still had some odd behavior at the extremes. It had a tendency to overcorrect before cancelling. Definitely keep your hand on the wheel if you see a sharp curve coming up while using lane centering, or you could find yourself yeeted into the next lane during an extreme case. Expanding the operating envelope of lane centering (in terms of max steering wheel angle) is something I'd like to see in future versions. It's not bad, but could be better.

Stability through intersections with no lines was also improved. It was less likely to cancel or do something nuts when the lines disappear, but still has its limits and gets confused if you go more than a couple of seconds without lines.

Adaptive Cruise Control and Braking

Things are pretty much the same here as before. You have four following distance levels, and I prefer using distance 1 or 2 in traffic to prevent cut-ins. Braking smoothness has improved slightly compared to my car. The management of the following distance gap seems similar to older versions as well. During heavy braking, it handles it but it still gets a little close, which can be a bit disconcerting if you're not used to it. It dealt with stop-and-go traffic very well, no big complaints there. However, in the next version of BlueCruise, I would like to see some focus on braking and following distance control (especially during heavy braking from 70-20 MPH) rather than just steering improvements.

With stopped traffic, the car will still slow down and end up creeping forward to the stopped vehicle. However, one big improvement is Auto Resume now waits 30+ seconds at stop lights!

IMG_1170.jpeg


On my car, it will only wait 5 seconds outside of a Blue Zone before it timeouts (then you have to press the resume button or tap the pedal when the light turns green). It seems they've made a change to allow 30+ seconds of auto-resume globally. This was a small but very welcome change, less things to constantly pay attention to at each stop, the car just starts again on its own most of the time. I hope it's something that could be fixed in older vehicles as well, it's so much nicer to get the full 30 seconds.

Automatic Lane Changes

This is the key new feature for BlueCruise 1.5, lane changes are now fully automated. If the left lane is clear and you're approaching a slower vehicle, you will see the following prompt before the car moves over all by itself. Notice the distance to the vehicle, it starts plenty early:

IMG_1178.jpeg


Car moves over, you go by the slower vehicle, then afterwards if the lane is clear you'll see this:

IMG_1174.jpeg


Of course, you can also initiate the lane change yourself at any time by tapping the turn signal stalk. If there are two lanes, the automatic lane change will want to keep you in the right lane, and if there are three lanes, it will want to keep you in the middle lane. It will only pass vehicles on the left, never on the right side. So if you get in a left lane hog situation, you'll have to change manually to pass on the right.

The lane change logic was extremely smart and avoided unnecessary lane changes. If there was any kind of slower vehicle up ahead in the right lane, it would wait to move back over. The distance it was looking ahead before moving over seemed incredible, beyond radar range, so I'm guessing it's using the camera to look for vehicles in the adjacent lane as well as radar? If anything, it was almost too conservative about getting back over, but I prefer it that way to avoid having to change lanes again in a short time. That or else the lane changes were inhibited by following a vehicle in front of me (which is often the case in rush hour traffic).

Unfortunately, lane changes are only for slower vehicles and not tied to navigation (like Tesla Navigate on Autopilot), so if you have an exit coming up, you will have to manually maneuver. The only time the automatic lane change gets annoying is if you're in an exit lane, and it decides to move you left out of the exit lane. Perhaps they could add logic to disable auto changes when you're in an exit-only lane, or when you are less than 1 mile to an exit in the active navigation.

Overall, I think the automatic lane change feature was very well done; it made a very pleasing driving experience of "set it and forget it". I could see going for many dozens of miles without lifting a finger using BlueCruise 1.5. We have arrived at the final frontier of sit there and do nothing (but watch).

Desired Improvements

There is still an 80 MPH speed limit on hands-free BlueCruise. In many states with 75+ MPH speed limits, people often drive 85 MPH or more. I would like to see the speed threshold raised to at least 85 MPH.

The coverage of hands-free Blue Cruise has still not expanded (especially in Canada), and is limited to protected access freeways only. That is very unfortunate, because I believe the technology has progressed to the point that hands-free can be safely allowed on many more roads, which GM has done with Super Cruise. If you look at the coverage map, it's no comparison (130,000 miles vs. 750,000 miles):

HF Coverage Comparsion small.jpg


I hope that Ford will do what it takes to significantly expand the coverage of hands-free BlueCruise in the near future.

Summary

Overall, BlueCruise 1.5 provides some good improvements. Lane stability is better, there are fewer dropouts, and you get fully automated lane changes. Overall performance is very good, and it's a very safe system. Hands-free is limited to mapped freeways, but the lane centering works well on the rest of the roads.

Last, I'm happy to answer any questions you might have.
Lee,
1st, thanks for the write up!! It's nice to get the perspective of someone that has been using the system for years and can compare as opposed to a car journalist that might be driving a Camry or something.

I watched Patrick and Liv's video and read your write up. I did not see any mention of lane-centering only. Do you still have to have cruise control initiated to use lane-centering?

Kia/Hyundai and now (2025) Cadillac (Lyriq & Vistiq) can use lane centering without cruise control. I think this is a feature that Ford, if not on the 2025 BC, should enable and frankly does not seem like it should be that difficult. Lane-centering only on these competitors works on and OFF the Freeways. Thanks again for taking the time to share your experience.
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,509
Reaction score
13,295
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
You're probably seeing a couple of BlueCruise 1.5 reviews coming out today. Ford also gave me the opportunity to test it along with @Mach-E VLOG. I spent an hour or two with it during I-25 rush hour traffic in Colorado.

First thing to understand is that BlueCruise 1.5 is only available on 2025 models and later. There were some hardware changes (new front camera and IPMA hardware revision, I believe) to enable the new features, which means that BC 1.5 will not be backwards compatible with pre-2025 models.

The big new feature with BC 1.5 is fully automatic lane changes, which means it will do everything for you without lifting a finger. More on that later. In-lane stability and dropouts have also been improved greatly.

New UI:

IMG_1172.jpeg


The instrument cluster graphics have been redesigned for 2025. This is what hands-free mode looks like. Some things have been moved around, but it has the same functions as before. Following distance is displayed with bars in front, and the position of the car moves around with lane shifts (around semis) like before. Left and right arrows show up in Blue Zones when lane changes are available. We still only have a single lane being rendered; I would have liked to see multi-lane rendering for increased situational awareness.

Lane Stability and Curves:

The first thing I noticed is the lane centering force has been significantly improved. If you've ever driven a Tesla or Rivian, you know the steering wheel is very much "locked in" while lane centering modes are engaged—the steering wheel is hard to turn unless you force it to "break free" from lane centering (which can cause an overcorrection into the next lane). In older BC versions, it's the exact opposite. Steering is very lazy and cooperative, easy to turn. With BlueCruise 1.5, the lane centering feel is now much more of a hybrid between old BlueCruise and Tesla. You will definitely feel more resistance if you want to move the lane position over a bit to go around roadkill or a pothole, but it still lets you do that smoothly and cooperatively without disengaging. When you let go, it very quickly returns you to the center of the lane (better path calculations). It's much more immediate about it than the older versions. I actually prefer that compared to my car (a 2022 with BlueCruise 1.3).

Performance on curves is improved compared to previous versions. On the freeway, I did not notice an appreciable bias to one side of the lane or the other. It may move over slightly to the inside of the curve, but that's what most people do anyway. Lane shifts around large vehicles and semis worked as expected. The number of hands-free dropouts was also significantly reduced compared to what I see with BC 1.3. There was only one or two times during the entire drive (~70 miles) it required hands-on. So that was a welcome improvement.

On sharper curves (on lesser roads), the lane centering still had some odd behavior at the extremes. It had a tendency to overcorrect before cancelling. Definitely keep your hand on the wheel if you see a sharp curve coming up while using lane centering, or you could find yourself yeeted into the next lane during an extreme case. Expanding the operating envelope of lane centering (in terms of max steering wheel angle) is something I'd like to see in future versions. It's not bad, but could be better.

Stability through intersections with no lines was also improved. It was less likely to cancel or do something nuts when the lines disappear, but still has its limits and gets confused if you go more than a couple of seconds without lines.

Adaptive Cruise Control and Braking

Things are pretty much the same here as before. You have four following distance levels, and I prefer using distance 1 or 2 in traffic to prevent cut-ins. Braking smoothness has improved slightly compared to my car. The management of the following distance gap seems similar to older versions as well. During heavy braking, it handles it but it still gets a little close, which can be a bit disconcerting if you're not used to it. It dealt with stop-and-go traffic very well, no big complaints there. However, in the next version of BlueCruise, I would like to see some focus on braking and following distance control (especially during heavy braking from 70-20 MPH) rather than just steering improvements.

With stopped traffic, the car will still slow down and end up creeping forward to the stopped vehicle. However, one big improvement is Auto Resume now waits 30+ seconds at stop lights!

IMG_1170.jpeg


On my car, it will only wait 5 seconds outside of a Blue Zone before it timeouts (then you have to press the resume button or tap the pedal when the light turns green). It seems they've made a change to allow 30+ seconds of auto-resume globally. This was a small but very welcome change, less things to constantly pay attention to at each stop, the car just starts again on its own most of the time. I hope it's something that could be fixed in older vehicles as well, it's so much nicer to get the full 30 seconds.

Automatic Lane Changes

This is the key new feature for BlueCruise 1.5, lane changes are now fully automated. If the left lane is clear and you're approaching a slower vehicle, you will see the following prompt before the car moves over all by itself. Notice the distance to the vehicle, it starts plenty early:

IMG_1178.jpeg


Car moves over, you go by the slower vehicle, then afterwards if the lane is clear you'll see this:

IMG_1174.jpeg


Of course, you can also initiate the lane change yourself at any time by tapping the turn signal stalk. If there are two lanes, the automatic lane change will want to keep you in the right lane, and if there are three lanes, it will want to keep you in the middle lane. It will only pass vehicles on the left, never on the right side. So if you get in a left lane hog situation, you'll have to change manually to pass on the right.

The lane change logic was extremely smart and avoided unnecessary lane changes. If there was any kind of slower vehicle up ahead in the right lane, it would wait to move back over. The distance it was looking ahead before moving over seemed incredible, beyond radar range, so I'm guessing it's using the camera to look for vehicles in the adjacent lane as well as radar? If anything, it was almost too conservative about getting back over, but I prefer it that way to avoid having to change lanes again in a short time. That or else the lane changes were inhibited by following a vehicle in front of me (which is often the case in rush hour traffic).

Unfortunately, lane changes are only for slower vehicles and not tied to navigation (like Tesla Navigate on Autopilot), so if you have an exit coming up, you will have to manually maneuver. The only time the automatic lane change gets annoying is if you're in an exit lane, and it decides to move you left out of the exit lane. Perhaps they could add logic to disable auto changes when you're in an exit-only lane, or when you are less than 1 mile to an exit in the active navigation.

Overall, I think the automatic lane change feature was very well done; it made a very pleasing driving experience of "set it and forget it". I could see going for many dozens of miles without lifting a finger using BlueCruise 1.5. We have arrived at the final frontier of sit there and do nothing (but watch).

Desired Improvements

There is still an 80 MPH speed limit on hands-free BlueCruise. In many states with 75+ MPH speed limits, people often drive 85 MPH or more. I would like to see the speed threshold raised to at least 85 MPH.

The coverage of hands-free Blue Cruise has still not expanded (especially in Canada), and is limited to protected access freeways only. That is very unfortunate, because I believe the technology has progressed to the point that hands-free can be safely allowed on many more roads, which GM has done with Super Cruise. If you look at the coverage map, it's no comparison (130,000 miles vs. 750,000 miles):

HF Coverage Comparsion small.jpg


I hope that Ford will do what it takes to significantly expand the coverage of hands-free BlueCruise in the near future.

Summary

Overall, BlueCruise 1.5 provides some good improvements. Lane stability is better, there are fewer dropouts, and you get fully automated lane changes. Overall performance is very good, and it's a very safe system. Hands-free is limited to mapped freeways, but the lane centering works well on the rest of the roads.

Last, I'm happy to answer any questions you might have.
Great review!

What do you think is stopping Ford from using BC on more than just Insterstates?

Because the tech is basically camera based, what does the “mapping” even do?
 

jgcom

Well-Known Member
First Name
Joe
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
306
Reaction score
467
Location
Louisiana
Vehicles
Mach-E 4X premium, '21
Occupation
Physics prof.
Country flag
Regarding application of this to older vehicles, like mine, I can speculate why we can't. Mach-Lee leads with the the increased lane-centering force, which I take to mean increased control loop gain and bandwidth. This normally requires some combination of lower in- and out-of-band noise in the sensors, lower delay (phase lag) in the sensors and actuators, and lower delay in the digital signal processor.

Driving my '21 with BC 1.3, I often ponder what's limiting performance, and my best guess is some combination of lane position sensor noise/error from glare, and phase lag in the processor. The latter has probably improved over the years with software tweaks, but the former is all hardware, I think.

I wonder if the '25 hardware is more glare-resistant when looking at lane markers?
 

ChehRob

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rob
Joined
Aug 24, 2023
Threads
13
Messages
964
Reaction score
571
Location
Seattle WA
Vehicles
MME Premium AWD Ext. Range (Job2)
Occupation
ret
Country flag
What will determine my next car update is better collision avoidance and pedestrian/cycle recognition and emergency braking for that. Does 1.5 do any of that significantly better?
 

uberpat

Active Member
First Name
Patrick
Joined
Jun 16, 2025
Threads
5
Messages
33
Reaction score
58
Location
Joppa, MD
Vehicles
2025 Mustang Mach-E Premium eAWD Ext. Battery
Didn't realize I already had BC 1.5 in my 2025 MME until I read this article and saw your pictures. It's been working really well on the interstate and highways. I enjoy the lane changing, but I agree that it's annoying when you are close to your exit and it starts initiating a left lane change. I was hoping there was a setting to turn off automatic lane change but still keep the option to use the turn signal to initiate a lane change. It seems like these features are tied together though and you can't have one or the other.
Overall, I'm happy with the performance because I've never had anything like this in a vehicle, but it's really easy to get salty if you spend time watching a few Tesla vehicles using their self-driving technology. The displayed information in Tesla's seems a decade ahead of what BC 1.5 is offering in the latest update.
I got complementary BC into September and then I may see if I am fine with just active cruise control and lane keeping and only subscribe to BlueCruise when I have a long trip coming up.
 

bbulkow

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Aug 30, 2022
Threads
24
Messages
889
Reaction score
729
Location
menlo park, california
Vehicles
Honda CRV
Country flag
I believe in the Motor Trend article they mentioned that on 1.5 the car will also move out of a passing lane if a faster vehicle is approaching from behind. Did you experience that? It seems it would require the use of some sort of rear facing camera or sensor beyond the very short range parking sensors.
All models have a rear facing camera. It shows when you're backing up.
 
OP
OP
Mach-Lee

Mach-Lee

Well-Known Member
First Name
Lee
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Threads
262
Messages
11,365
Reaction score
25,025
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium AWD
Occupation
Sci/Eng
Country flag
I watched Patrick and Liv's video and read your write up. I did not see any mention of lane-centering only. Do you still have to have cruise control initiated to use lane-centering?
It works the same as before, so you have to have cruise control engaged to get lane centering. Without it, just lane assist is active. Always-on lane centering would be nice, although I personally would only use it with cruise control

Did they say anything about upgrading older vehicles to BC1.4 at least?
No, I have no idea.

What do you think is stopping Ford from using BC on more than just Insterstates?
Lawyers.

What will determine my next car update is better collision avoidance and pedestrian/cycle recognition and emergency braking for that. Does 1.5 do any of that significantly better?
Not sure, I didn’t try to hit any pedestrians during the test.

All models have a rear facing camera. It shows when you're backing up.
That camera cannot see very far, only about 6’, so it can’t be used to detect approaching vehicles in time. Only the radar can, but is aimed for looking in the adjacent lanes rather than directly behind you.
Sponsored

 
 







Top