JohnFoxeSheets
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- John
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2022
- Threads
- 28
- Messages
- 3,403
- Reaction score
- 5,500
- Location
- San Francisco
- Website
- johnfoxesheets.com
- Vehicles
- 2022 Iced Blue Silver Mach E GT
- Occupation
- Retired Engineer
To be clear, I'm not anti-EVs - quite the contrary. I just posted based off a study I read about. But I don't have the link, so I unfortunately I can't provide my source. The point is that manufacturing EVs is more carbon intensive than manufacturing similar ICE vehicles. To offset that initial carbon output, the EV needs to be used in a way that offsets what would have been ICE miles with their intendant carbon output. (Obviously the source of electricity used for an EV matters. For instance 100% of the electricity I use to charge my EV at home comes from carbon-free sources.)10,000 miles per year is not required to break even on emissions, and depending on how you count emissions EVs can be cleaner starting from Mile 0. The large majority of emissions in a vehicle's lifecycle are tailpipe emissions, and the relative savings vary significantly by region. In general, less driving is less emissions. And it's nearly a myth that the indirect/non tailpipe emissions for EVs are higher than ICE vehicles. See third link below.
https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/driving-cleaner#read-online-content
https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/are-electric-vehicles-definitely-better-climate-gas-powered-cars
https://environment.yale.edu/news/a...ide-lower-carbon-emissions-through-additional
Sponsored