Loss of HOV lanes for EVs

ChrisO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2025
Threads
9
Messages
998
Reaction score
992
Location
US
Vehicles
.
1) The idea to allow an exception to the HOV rules of more than one person in the car from the federal law, was allowed as a temporary exception. That exception is now expiring. The administration didn't have to do anything. They simply took it at as an opportunity not to extend the exception.

2) Why was this temporary in the first place? The whole point of the HOV lanes were to encourage people to do something that would reduce traffic and emissions. But let's face it, the "single driver" exception doesn't reduce traffic, and was bound to go away when you get to the point where a large portion of your cars fall into that category.

I personally think that it was the right thing to use this to encourage people buying cars that pollute less when they started all of this, but only for a period of time till they become common place. I don't know about other states, but I do believe that California has hit that point, and that it is right for the single driver HOV exceptions to go away.
Sponsored

 
Last edited:

jjhenry

Well-Known Member
First Name
JJ
Joined
May 27, 2021
Threads
6
Messages
168
Reaction score
237
Location
Carlsbad, CA
Vehicles
'21 Mach-E GT, '69 Chevy C20, '99 Rodeo, '09 Vespa
Occupation
IT
Country flag
I can't see California changing its rules because a bureaucrat in DC says it should...
California is most definitely changing the rules because of the expiring Federal exemption.

Clean Air Vehicle Decals

My commute will be roughly 10-15 minutes longer each way starting in October. However, I agree with @Mach-Lee that HOV lanes should incentivize reducing the number of vehicles on the road, not the adoption of clean air vehicles. I'll be glad to take the ugly stickers off.
 

4sallypat

Well-Known Member
First Name
Pat
Joined
Mar 30, 2022
Threads
103
Messages
2,806
Reaction score
2,463
Location
Southern California
Website
www.kudo-ume-farms.com
Vehicles
'23 MME delivered May '23 + '22 Lightning July '22
Occupation
Network Tech
Country flag
California is most definitely changing the rules because of the expiring Federal exemption.

Clean Air Vehicle Decals

My commute will be roughly 10-15 minutes longer each way starting in October. However, I agree with @Mach-Lee that HOV lanes should incentivize reducing the number of vehicles on the road, not the adoption of clean air vehicles. I'll be glad to take the ugly stickers off.
Same here - my commute will add another 10-20 mins in California.

Have been exclusively been using HOV lanes as a single occupant since 2018.

I'm going to miss that "free express" lane...

But I also am hearing that the HOV lanes are being converted into Fastrak lanes so my Fastrak transponder w/ EV discount will cost me a little, but well worth the time saver.
 

azerik

Well-Known Member
First Name
Erik
Joined
Jan 8, 2023
Threads
79
Messages
4,545
Reaction score
4,558
Location
Chandler/Flagstaff, AZ
Vehicles
'21 Spacey Prem4x, '21 RX450H, 13 Focus EV
Occupation
DevSecNetOps, General PITA
Country flag
I think my MME started planning for this when i got my BC1.3 update. BC, for me, HF hardly works in the HOV anymore. But really I get tailgated just as much in any lane, including on and off ramps.
 

rhougey

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rich
Joined
Apr 29, 2021
Threads
4
Messages
455
Reaction score
542
Location
North California
Vehicles
2021 Mach-E Prem RWD, 1968 Mustang, 2014 Ram 1500
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
Starting the end of September, one occupant EVs will not be allowed in HOV or HOT lanes. If you feel strongly about this contact the DOT, your representative, senator, or someone in Washington. The official memo from Martin C Knopp, Associate Administrator for Operations at the DOT is attached.
HOV
High Occupancy Vehicle

How is any vehicle with ONE occupant considered to be High Occupancy?
Maybe you could get DOT to have EV only lanes or Blue Car Only lanes or Ford Only Lanes? My point is you are not special because you drive an electric car.

P.S. I have no idea what an HOT lane is.
 


kdonnel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Threads
35
Messages
1,147
Reaction score
1,665
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicles
2022 CA Route 1, 2020 Bolt EV
Country flag
P.S. I have no idea what an HOT lane is.
High Occupancy Toll

An HOV lane that comes with a fee to use.

In Georgia there are I-85 HOT lanes located on the northern side of Metro Atlanta that were covered by this provision that is expiring because the funding used to build the lanes were tied to this provision.

In Georgia there are also I-75 South and I-75 North HOT lanes, not the direction of the road but where they are located in Metro Atlanta, that never allowed free use because the funding for those lanes were not tied to this provision.

I-85/75 also has HOV lanes on a portion of the road that was also covered by this provision.
 

ChasingCoral

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mark
Joined
Feb 3, 2020
Threads
502
Messages
14,318
Reaction score
28,680
Location
Maryland
Vehicles
2021 GB E4X FE, 2022 F-150 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Retired oceanographer
Country flag
This is nation wide?

I thought it was just a Georgia thing that it was ending.
It's nation wide. This was a DOT program that allowed states to put in place exceptions to HOV/HOT lanes and tolls. It was authorized by Congress a decade ago and is coming to an end.
 

Neps

Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Jan 25, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
19
Reaction score
18
Location
Floating off California
Vehicles
Bronco, MX-5, Focus EV, F150, Scout II (2)
The State here converted all of the HOV lanes on the freeways that I drive into toll-based Express lanes quite a while ago. So I have never had the opportunity to use an HOV lane while being a single occupant. What's worse is now when I have 2 or 3 occupants I still can't use the lanes since they're toll-based.
Another way for the state to make money, no one should be surprised that the state is changing lanes funded as HOV to promote multiple passenger use, to lanes which offer some income. You got's to pay to play here in the Golden State
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,511
Reaction score
13,296
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
Call me crazy, but I generally agree with the memo, single occupant vehicles should not be allowed free use of the HOV lanes. Single occupant vehicles should pay tolls, but the toll for an EV should be less than gas. Similar view to totally free charging, it invites overuse and abuse. It also simplifies enforcement. Keep it cheap, but not free.
Agreed.

As much as I like special treatment, I hate traffic more.

Not sure this policy was the deciding factor for many people buying an EV anyways anymore.

Government incentives are meant to impact behavior changes. But if they no longer change behavior, they’re no longer needed.
 

kdonnel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Threads
35
Messages
1,147
Reaction score
1,665
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicles
2022 CA Route 1, 2020 Bolt EV
Country flag
Not sure this policy was the deciding factor for many people buying an EV anyways anymore.
Was that the purpose? If so there were huge loopholes.

It certainly influenced me to buy an EV but under the program I could have bought a Chevrolet Suburban and reaped the same benefits. The provision allowed alternative fueled vehicles, not just EV, so that meant that all the GM vehicles that could use E85 qualified as well. You didn't have to actually use E85, just be able to use E85. In fact the provision allowed vehicles fueled solely by electricity, natural gas, propane, bi-fuel, or dual fuel. That meant E85 and plug in hybrids qualified but not hybrids.

For the longest time I saw more Georgia AFV plates on GM E85 vehicles than I did on EV.

If you opted for the AFV plate on your flex fuel vehicle you had to pay the annual alternative fuel vehicle fee as though you were an EV not buying any gas but if you were saving $9000+ in tolls that extra $200ish at registration was well worth it.
 
Last edited:

jav_eee

Well-Known Member
First Name
Javi
Joined
Jul 30, 2025
Threads
3
Messages
162
Reaction score
120
Location
Edinburg, TX
Vehicles
2025 Mach-E Select
Occupation
Energy Industry
or a huge RAM diesel obscuring all visibility from my rear window. No thanks
this is a good thing, you're supposed to be looking forward when doing 70 mph down the highway.
 

4sallypat

Well-Known Member
First Name
Pat
Joined
Mar 30, 2022
Threads
103
Messages
2,806
Reaction score
2,463
Location
Southern California
Website
www.kudo-ume-farms.com
Vehicles
'23 MME delivered May '23 + '22 Lightning July '22
Occupation
Network Tech
Country flag
......

Not sure this policy was the deciding factor for many people buying an EV anyways anymore.

Government incentives are meant to impact behavior changes. But if they no longer change behavior, they’re no longer needed.
Yes, this program was one of reasons I bought EVs.

Traffic in Los Angeles and surrounding counties are a nightmare so if there was a way not to spend time in bumper to bumper traffic, yes by all means.

All the cars since 2018 have been either PHEV or EV which allows for single occupant HOV lane access.

Really going to miss it.

Notice CA clean air green stickers on bumpers:
Ford Mustang Mach-E Loss of HOV lanes for EVs IMG_4053 2
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,947
Reaction score
17,394
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
I habitually avoided the HOV lanes anyhow and didn’t stop when I got a PHEV or an EV. So this change doesn’t affect me much, if at all. I bought my EV because it was like my other cars: A fun toy. 🤷‍♂️🐩
 
OP
OP
StrWhtMME

StrWhtMME

Well-Known Member
First Name
Richard
Joined
Jan 28, 2021
Threads
18
Messages
193
Reaction score
156
Location
Marietta, GA
Vehicles
F-150, Electric Focus. 21 MME Prm SR, 23 Maverick
Country flag
My point for posting this and including the memo is, it might be included in the overall rollback of EV mandates. Maybe it was not intended to be included with those rollbacks. Our local news here in Georgia pointed out, this will just add more vehicles to the normal traffic lanes. Driving and commuting will suffer. Motorcycles will still be allowed in the High Occupancy Lanes.
This is nation wide?

I thought it was just a Georgia thing that it was ending.

I pay the $50 a year for the Alternative Fuel Vehicle plates that allow me to ride in the I-85 HOT lanes for free and in the I-85 HOV lanes as a single rider.

I did it because at one point I had a job that round trip would cost me about $36 a day in tolls to save an hour on my commute. I bought an EV and before I could even use the plates one time covid hit and I started working from home full time and then got a new job before I had to do that commute again.

It was the entire reason I bought my first EV, that potential $9000 annual toll savings and 245 hours of commute saved.

I continued to pay the $50 for each EV when I renewed my tags because I figured I still saved some money. This thread prompted me to download my transactions from the Georgia Peach Pass site and so far this year I have had $229.45 in adjustments due to the AFV plates. Extrapolate that over a full year and I would see adjustments of about $370. Subtract out the $100 I pay for the AFV plate and I will be losing out on $270 a year in savings. Many times I ride in the HOT lane just because it is free and not because it saves me any time so realistically my real savings are probably closer to $200 a year.

That’s why I made post. I have placed a call to the DOT, waiting on a call back. I hope this just an overlook. Let’s hope this will be resolved, and it will keep your commute somewhat sane.
So as not that much of a hit to my budget that this goes away but I feel for people who still were doing the commute I had in 2021 that triggered me to buy an EV to take advantage of this HOT/HOV lane rules that are ending.
Was that the purpose? If so there were huge loopholes.

It certainly influenced me to buy an EV but under the program I could have bought a Chevrolet Suburban and reaped the same benefits. The provision allowed alternative fueled vehicles, not just EV, so that meant that all the GM vehicles that could use E85 qualified as well. You didn't have to actually use E85, just be able to use E85. In fact the provision allowed vehicles fueled solely by electricity, natural gas, propane, bi-fuel, or dual fuel. That meant E85 and plug in hybrids qualified but not hybrids.

For the longest time I saw more Georgia AFV plates on GM E85 vehicles than I did on EV.

If you opted for the AFV plate on your flex fuel vehicle you had to pay the annual alternative fuel vehicle fee as though you were an EV not buying any gas but if you were saving $9000+ in tolls that extra $200ish at registration was well worth it.


I believe if you are driving and E85 vehicle in the HOV labels and pulled over you must show a gas receipt with a recent date of purchase.
 

kdonnel

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 31, 2021
Threads
35
Messages
1,147
Reaction score
1,665
Location
Metro Atlanta
Vehicles
2022 CA Route 1, 2020 Bolt EV
Country flag
My point for posting this and including the memo is, it might be included in the overall rollback of EV mandates. Maybe it was not intended to be included with those rollbacks. Our local news here in Georgia pointed out, this will just add more vehicles to the normal traffic lanes. Driving and commuting will suffer. Motorcycles will still be allowed in the High Occupancy Lanes.





I believe if you are driving and E85 vehicle in the HOV labels and pulled over you must show a gas receipt with a recent date of purchase.
Not in Georgia. The requirement is to have the AFV plate.
Sponsored

 
 







Top