dbsb3233
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- TimCO
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2019
- Threads
- 56
- Messages
- 10,100
- Reaction score
- 11,965
- Location
- Colorado, USA
- Vehicles
- 2021 Mustang Mach-E FE, 2025 Porche Macan Electric
- Occupation
- Retired
I think we're kinda saying the same thing in different ways. Yep, ACP/AA is rarely a big enough priority for people to be the deal-breaker one way or the other. It's a nice feature, like power liftgate and heated seats and all that kinda stuff, but it's rarely the single biggie that the overall purchase decision is based on.I'm gonna have to respectfully disagree in part. I think we both agree on the younger crowd. My younger friends aren't buying EVs, but even with the ICE vehicles they buy I've never heard one say they need or want ACP/AA. The restraints are more so budgetary. Where I disagree is in the EV sales numbers. The average EV owner is in their mid 50s and makes 6 digits according to recent data. It's not nearly as much of a budgetary issue for them. The vehicles with ACP/AA are well known, from very well know manufacturers. People are choosing to put their money into vehicles without it. While I suppose some might like to have it in a Tesla, for example, it wasn't a deal breaker, enough to go to VW, Ford, Hyundai etc and the numbers, especial production vs delivery, prove that. There's no wait for an MME, but there is for Tesla, yet they go Tesla. The MME reporting a YoY loss and getting beat by a 100k truck proves, in my opinion, that people don't care about ACP/AA as much as some think.
Any use of sales stats attempting to tie ACP/AA to purchase decisions would have to include ICE too, otherwise it's just a small subset heavily skewed by other factors. I thought that's what you were doing initially but now it sounds like that wasn't the way you meant it, in which case we agree.
Sponsored