Extended Range EV or Battery EV

[DWIL]

Seems like you're either using AI to write, or you can't complete a thought...

" So, how about this question; what are your thoughts on AI integrated technology into the "

My thoughts are AI shouldn't be allowed on forums or social media at all, and any AI content should be flagged as such. I don't want AI in my things without my permission. No AI phone, car, PC, tablet, ...

Lol, not at all, but I do suffer from disgraphia.. Thanks for being considerate!

Sponsored

 

[Kamuelaflyer]

don’t disagree that Ford executives ultimately decide the product roadmap, but I think the conclusion here jumps a few steps ahead of the evidence

As I said, you’re free to disagree. But I’ll go 1 further, the Mach-e is a dead horse walking.

canceled incentives, shrinking trims, dealer disengagement, or explicit internal leaks.

What makes you think that none, or all, haven’t already happened?

But as @RickMachE said …

Dead horse already beaten enough here.

 

[DWIL]

As I said, you’re free to disagree. But I’ll go 1 further, the Mach-e is a dead horse walking.

What makes you think that none, or all, haven’t already happened?

But as @RickMachE said …

That I don't know. Since this is my first Mach-E to include EV, and after observing for years. I'm hoping for a better outcome. As a diehard Ford guy, I am hoping for the best.

 

[Kamuelaflyer]

That I don't know. Since this is my first Mach-E to include EV, and after observing for years. I'm hoping for a better outcome. As a diehard Ford guy, I am hoping for the best.

The California Route 1 was dropped. It was the easiest way to get 300 mile range with this car at launch. Aero wheels and RWD. it was a good step up from the Select.

Incentives are pretty generic atm. Nothing that shouts, “Come look at our really cool looking electric Mustang!” (Or electric car if you’re leaning in the “It’s Not-A-Mustang” direction).

Here’s a real key consideration, though: I’ve been known to be wrong. Just ask literally anyone on this forum.

 

[gavine]

I don't want to haul-around a 500+lb engine, etc. that will very rarely ever get used. On road trips, I'd rather stop at a charger for 20 to 30 minutes after driving for 4 or 5 hours once or twice a year. I think I would end-up spending more time getting the oil changed per year on the EREV than I do charging my BEV in public per year.

 

[Snakebitten]

@DWIL
Welcome to the forum.

As you can tell by now, the initiation process can be a bit brutal around here. Especially if you are polite.

Having said that, if you take the punch(s) and don't let it run you off, you'll eventually figure out how to avoid triggering the assault.

Hang in there. This forum has a wealth of information and a lot of good folks.

 

[HuntingPudel]

@DWIL
<SNIP>
if you take the punch(s)
<SNIP>

I don’t punch. I generally just growl.

 

[Sikkun]

I personally don’t want a bunch of parts from an ICE that can break on top of an EV. If I did I would have looked at plug in hybrids in the first place. I guess you can rebrand those as EREVs and try a convince me it’s something different…but you’re still adding more that can break for something I don’t need.

Majority of people are not towing, majority of people don’t have a range problem. Even most realistic “drive to grandmas”, or “trip to Disney” is 2-3 charge stops for large portions of the population. It really doesn’t add much time compared to an ICE…I’ve done it, many times.

But none of the facts really matter, because we have a perception problem. Many anti EV people are dug in and it doesn’t really matter what you say. They need 500 miles of range and to tow 15 elephants…and even then they might rather have a diesel truck because it’s their God given right.

Ford can’t fix that logic.

Government regulation could help steer and force change…but not happening in EV direction currently so you have that.

So really your best option is to make something that looks good and is AFFORDABLE. Because money speaks louder than anything.

 

[NorthlandPhil]

Pure EV.

Best way to reduce "range anxiety" IMO is to take a deep breath and exhale slowly.

 

[Elmst-e]

The increase in DCFC locations over the last 2 years is so impressive, I can’t believe anyone who has has actually used DCFC would be the least bit apprehensive about range. The concept seems a bit silly to me.

 

[celestial_knight]

It’s a smart bridge technology and I would love an EREV Mach E, if the vehicle stayed performant

For the F150 a hybrid power train is the obvious choice

Even PHEV is in consideration even though I used to hate them; they are the ones that can truly be the worst of both worlds whereas EREVs are fine

But PHEV can in theory temperature control the battery easily, and I know how to manage the battery for lifespan. I’ll use EV only mode for Youtube, and hybrid for range

I would prefer an EREV though for electric performance, especially if the small gas generator can get used to warm or cool your battery quickly as needed

 

[DWIL]

@DWIL
Welcome to the forum.

As you can tell by now, the initiation process can be a bit brutal around here. Especially if you are polite.

Having said that, if you take the punch(s) and don't let it run you off, you'll eventually figure out how to avoid triggering the assault.

Hang in there. This forum has a wealth of information and a lot of good folks.

Its not to much I can't handle. 20+ years in the Army, 3 wars and a couple of skimmishes. I'm polite, becasue there is a dark-side....

@DWIL
Welcome to the forum.

As you can tell by now, the initiation process can be a bit brutal around here. Especially if you are polite.

Having said that, if you take the punch(s) and don't let it run you off, you'll eventually figure out how to avoid triggering the assault.

Hang in there. This forum has a wealth of information and a lot of good folks.

RGR that... 20+, 3 wars, and a few skirmishes ...

 

[DWIL]

I don’t punch. I generally just growl.

@HuntingPudel

 

[dermot]

Good morning, Mach-E family

I wanted to spark a discussion around the changes we’re seeing (and hearing about) with the F-150 Lightning, specifically the move toward a battery + gas-fed generator setup (often described as an Extended-Range Electric Vehicle, or EREV concept).

This seems like a big strategic shift, blending EV driving with onboard generation to reduce range anxiety and improve real-world usability, especially for trucks.

That got me thinking about us

Questions for the group:

Do you think Ford would ever extend EREV-style technology to the Mach-E, or should it remain a full BEV only?

Would a small onboard generator (range extender only, not drivetrain-driven) be a deal-breaker or a deal-maker for you?

Is this a smart bridge technology for the next 5–10 years, or a step backward from full electrification?

From a Mach-E owner’s perspective, what problem would this actually solve, if any?

I’m genuinely curious how others feel about this direction and whether it fits the Mach-E’s identity, or if it belongs strictly in trucks and larger platforms.

Looking forward to hearing different takes, pushback, and ideas. Let’s keep it constructive and forward-looking.

I think there should be an aftermarket, 3rd party 'inverter generator' for those that want to add it on. We have a Mach-e and a Lightning and wouldn't use it. There are a few videos of people charging while driving with a generator () and charging at a camp site with a generator ()..... if there is truly a market, why hasn't someone built it?

 

[Bad Dolphin]

One thing that often gets overlooked in EV discussions is design. The Ford Mustang Mach-E doesn’t try to look like a rolling appliance or a “space egg.” It looks like a car, and more importantly, it looks like a performance-inspired car.
The long hood, aggressive stance, muscular lines, and coupe-like profile immediately catch the eye. It appeals to people who appreciate proportions, presence, and emotion in a vehicle, not just efficiency numbers or software updates.

That matters.

For many buyers, the Mach-E is their first EV because it doesn’t feel like an EV. It feels familiar, sporty, and intentional. It bridges the gap between traditional car culture and electrification in a way most EVs simply don’t.

Love it or hate it, Ford understood something critical here: If you want people to adopt new technology, it helps when it looks and feels like something they already love.

And that’s where the Mach-E shines.

One thing that often gets overlooked in EV discussions is design. The Ford Mustang Mach-E doesn’t try to look like a rolling appliance or a “space egg.” It looks like a car, and more importantly, it looks like a performance-inspired car.
The long hood, aggressive stance, muscular lines, and coupe-like profile immediately catch the eye. It appeals to people who appreciate proportions, presence, and emotion in a vehicle, not just efficiency numbers or software updates.

That matters.

For many buyers, the Mach-E is their first EV because it doesn’t feel like an EV. It feels familiar, sporty, and intentional. It bridges the gap between traditional car culture and electrification in a way most EVs simply don’t.

Love it or hate it, Ford understood something critical here: If you want people to adopt new technology, it helps when it looks and feels like something they already love.

And that’s where the Mach-E shines.

You hit the nail right on the head! We started with a Tesla because it was the best available in 2018. And we loved it, only dumping it when the CEO's immature behavior became destructive in areas where he should not be involved.

Switching to the 2024 Mach E GT new in April, 2025, we were delighted with the perfect t transitional setup of a much better laid out set of controls. And it really us a great bridge from ICE car controls to more futuristic ones.

But what especially got us hooked was the performance, looks, and balance of the vehicle. It is a terrific first car coming from ICE because it is familiar--but it just performs WAY better.

in September, we bought our second EV--the VW Buzz second edition--to replace my low mileage, trouble free Pacifica minivan as a dedicated two person windsurf vehicle. Had Chrysler offered an all electric version, they would have kept us as customers, but the lie maintenance, low fuel cost (we have home solar), and the torque and acceleration of an EV are incomparable.

we can speculate what the future may bring, but Ford did a great job at introducing a good looking, great performing "first EV" transitional vehicle.

I just hope that all the roadblocks thrown up by the current administration do not prove too difficult for car businesses to surmount.

Sponsored