JohnFoxeSheets
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- John
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2022
- Threads
- 28
- Messages
- 3,403
- Reaction score
- 5,500
- Location
- San Francisco
- Website
- johnfoxesheets.com
- Vehicles
- 2022 Iced Blue Silver Mach E GT
- Occupation
- Retired Engineer
As others have said, it's the speed that lowers your range. In the stats you posted, you included this: "Accel - 98%, Decel - 97%, Speed - 25%". These are Ford's estimates of how "well" you did vs. perfect driving. Anything less than 100% means you lost range. So while your Acceleration and Deceleration were quite good, it was the speed that lowered your range.I'm way behind on understanding all the dynamics of range so I'm starting to learn a lot from reading posts like these. That being said, I'm curious from all of you that know a lot more than I do, your reaction to the performance I had yesterday. I have an extended range AWD. I was disappointed with the lower actual range miles I got for my long drive (even with driving highway speeds) I had higher hopes. However, maybe it's my expectations that are off.
Started at 100% - 304mi
Distance - 180mi
Ending range - 66mi
2.6mi/kWh
Energy use - 2% climate, 97% driving, 2% accessories, 0% ext temperature
Accel - 98%, Decel - 97%, Speed - 25%
Ave speed - 75mph
Ext temperature - 60 degrees
Thoughts?
I haven't taken enough longer trips to have a better sense on planning and expectations for charging. Is the trip planner pretty accurate for incorporating necessary charging?
Appreciate any help on this.
So why did the car show you a range of 304 miles when you started your trip? Because your previous driving hadn't been at 75 mph speeds for three hours straight. While it attempts to predict the future, the GOM only knows what it's seen in the past. It can't know where or how you will be driving.
One other thing: while ICE vehicles generally get better mileage on highways than in cities, with EVs it's the opposite. There are a number of factors that cause this.
Sponsored