Range issues

JohnFoxeSheets

Well-Known Member
First Name
John
Joined
Jan 29, 2022
Threads
28
Messages
3,403
Reaction score
5,500
Location
San Francisco
Website
johnfoxesheets.com
Vehicles
2022 Iced Blue Silver Mach E GT
Occupation
Retired Engineer
Country flag
I'm way behind on understanding all the dynamics of range so I'm starting to learn a lot from reading posts like these. That being said, I'm curious from all of you that know a lot more than I do, your reaction to the performance I had yesterday. I have an extended range AWD. I was disappointed with the lower actual range miles I got for my long drive (even with driving highway speeds) I had higher hopes. However, maybe it's my expectations that are off.

Started at 100% - 304mi
Distance - 180mi
Ending range - 66mi
2.6mi/kWh
Energy use - 2% climate, 97% driving, 2% accessories, 0% ext temperature
Accel - 98%, Decel - 97%, Speed - 25%
Ave speed - 75mph
Ext temperature - 60 degrees

Thoughts?

I haven't taken enough longer trips to have a better sense on planning and expectations for charging. Is the trip planner pretty accurate for incorporating necessary charging?

Appreciate any help on this.
As others have said, it's the speed that lowers your range. In the stats you posted, you included this: "Accel - 98%, Decel - 97%, Speed - 25%". These are Ford's estimates of how "well" you did vs. perfect driving. Anything less than 100% means you lost range. So while your Acceleration and Deceleration were quite good, it was the speed that lowered your range.

So why did the car show you a range of 304 miles when you started your trip? Because your previous driving hadn't been at 75 mph speeds for three hours straight. While it attempts to predict the future, the GOM only knows what it's seen in the past. It can't know where or how you will be driving.

One other thing: while ICE vehicles generally get better mileage on highways than in cities, with EVs it's the opposite. There are a number of factors that cause this.
Sponsored

 

Chris D

Well-Known Member
First Name
Chris
Joined
Feb 11, 2023
Threads
1
Messages
63
Reaction score
97
Location
Belgium
Vehicles
Aston Martin Vantage V8, Mustang Mach-E Premium EX
Country flag
I've had my car for over 2.5 years, and have the same spec Premium 4X. I average 2.7 mi/kWh for highway speeds in the summer (2.4 in winter). So at 2.6 you're in the right ballpark for 60 degree temps.

I use ABRP and PlugShare instead of the onboard nav for trip planning. But I do find the onboard nav is pretty accurate at SOC estimates since we got the updated software that adjusts the range based on the navigation destination.
I tend to agree that the onboard nav is quite accurate. I do several long trips for work a week, and it's always been pretty close. Mine's a 2023 built, so maybe the earlier ones were not that good, but I'm quite happy with it.

Basically, I'm using 10% battery for every 50km (31 miles), and that's @ 120km/h (75m/h). In summer/automn that is.
With an extended range, that's 500km on a full charge, which is great, considering my work trips are 350-400km each. Should be just enough during winter too.
Happy owner here ;) .
 

bbulkow

Well-Known Member
First Name
Brian
Joined
Aug 30, 2022
Threads
24
Messages
889
Reaction score
729
Location
menlo park, california
Vehicles
Honda CRV
Country flag
I'm way behind on understanding all the dynamics of range so I'm starting to learn a lot from reading posts like these. That being said, I'm curious from all of you that know a lot more than I do, your reaction to the performance I had yesterday. I have an extended range AWD. I was disappointed with the lower actual range miles I got for my long drive (even with driving highway speeds) I had higher hopes. However, maybe it's my expectations that are off.

Started at 100% - 304mi
Distance - 180mi
Ending range - 66mi
2.6mi/kWh
Energy use - 2% climate, 97% driving, 2% accessories, 0% ext temperature
Accel - 98%, Decel - 97%, Speed - 25%
Ave speed - 75mph
Ext temperature - 60 degrees

Thoughts?

I haven't taken enough longer trips to have a better sense on planning and expectations for charging. Is the trip planner pretty accurate for incorporating necessary charging?

Appreciate any help on this.
Thoughts?

You drive fast.

Your throttle technique is good.

If you want to arrive sooner on a multicharge trip, go slower. Like 65. Although it is just math, you can work out charging time vs road time. That extra 10 miles per hour does get you to a charger quicker.

I easily get 3.5 to 3.7 on the freeway, assuming flat. I have rwd is the only difference.
 

carlson11378

New Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2023
Threads
0
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Location
Detroit
Vehicles
2021 Mach-e
Country flag
Haha - thanks. Yes a lot of the highways in the midwest are 65 - 70mph speed limits. Thanks for the input.
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,932
Reaction score
17,376
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Speed is the biggest killer of range. If you have a super-far distance to the next charger and would be at the edge of your charge envelope, drive slower. If you can make the next charger with a lot of charge to spare, go ahead and drive somewhat fast. ??
Sponsored

 
 







Top