Krom2040
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Dave
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2023
- Threads
- 7
- Messages
- 51
- Reaction score
- 90
- Location
- Central Florida
- Vehicles
- 2023 MME Premium SR LFP
- Occupation
- Software Guy
I observed multiple threads about this issue on this forum from multiple people, both referencing the Reddit thread and as people claiming that it happened to them - you can see links to those threads in posts here. Others in those threads also responded along the lines "this also happened to me and it was resolved quickly", so it was my assumption that this happened to some number of people that is greater than three.Where are these numerous people? I am genuinely asking, I think we have seen this one and there was supposedly another instance from some months ago. I don't doubt that there are more that just don't make it online, but based on available evidence I haven't seen "numerous" people, just the same picture reposted in a hundred places recently.
Everything you mentioned there is something that can be mitigated. They can check the status of the battery before beginning the operation. They can keep a separate device or multiple separate devices that are read-only throughout the course of the operation, which they can write prior to beginning the operation and validate the health of before beginning. I sincerely doubt that the operator of the car pulled out the 12V battery midway through the process but it can nevertheless be done in stages so as to avoid that impacting the process. Even a hardware failure can likely be avoided, though as stated earlier, it doesn't appear that a hardware failure is in play here.As for number 2, bigredx86 didn't say hardware failure. There are a lot of issues that can come up that make reverting impossible. Corrupted storage, as was said, is one possibility. Especially if there was power loss during a write. The fact is, we have no idea what happened prior to this screen. Could the owner have pulled the 12v for some reason? Could a fuse have gone out messing with the update process?
If it's a storage issue, then storage is very cheap, especially in bulk, and would be a relatively small price to pay compared to having to do service calls and DEFINITELY compared to the damage to the brand of potentially having a reputation of "sometimes the car just gets bricked overnight". I don't know if this is a storage issue, but that's just an example.Also, while redundancy is possible, how much more cost and complexity are customers willing to take on to avoid a 1 in, let's say, million chance of an issue like this? Do we need redundant modules and entire APIMs? If we do, why do we suddenly need these things for a super rare failure like this but have survived for a century with ICE vehicles that have blown head gaskets, busted timing chains, blown spark plugs out of the block, and any number of other things that require a tow if the owner isn't experienced enough to fix it themselves? Those are also rare issues that have impacted "numerous" people that aren't problems for BEVs. But a couple pictures show up on the internet and suddenly this cannot stand!
Again, I love my MME so far and I'm optimistic that it continues to give me no trouble. But issues like this need to be taken seriously because they make potential buyers uncomfortable about the technology in the car and because they're perceived as being imminently avoidable. And in fact they are avoidable, though I concede that it's a complex problem.
Sponsored