waldo22
Active Member
- First Name
- Wes
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2023
- Threads
- 4
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 25
- Location
- Carrboro, NC, USA
- Vehicles
- 2022 California Route 1 RWD
- Thread starter
- #1
I have a California Route 1 RWD with the stock 18" x 7 wheels. I'm not looking to replace the wheels, but to get the best safety, handling, comfort and range from the wheels I already have.
I've settled on the Continental CrossContact LX 25 all seasons because they are highly rated on TireRack for almost every measure, are LRR, and are pretty universally praised.
It looks like the widest tire the stock wheels can support is 255mm.
Which setup makes the most sense?
235/60R18 103H square - 103 is the minimum acceptable load capacity, and are $30 cheaper each than XL
235/60R18 107V square - 107 XL may be overkill if 103 is acceptable?
235/60R18 107V front, 255/55R18 109H rear - both XL, staggered, this is the same setup as my VW ID.4
235/60R18 103H front, 255/55R18 109H rear - staggered, but with only 103 load in front? seems unwise to have such an imbalance.
My instinct is to go with a higher load capacity. What are the downsides to that, other than cost? Are the XLs heavier, worse range, etc.?
235/60 is about 0.5" larger diameter than stock at 29.1 vs. 28.6 stock, a 1.75% difference.
255/55 is about 0.4" larger diameter than stock at 29.0 vs 28.6 stock, a 1.4% difference.
Thoughts?
I've settled on the Continental CrossContact LX 25 all seasons because they are highly rated on TireRack for almost every measure, are LRR, and are pretty universally praised.
It looks like the widest tire the stock wheels can support is 255mm.
Which setup makes the most sense?
235/60R18 103H square - 103 is the minimum acceptable load capacity, and are $30 cheaper each than XL
235/60R18 107V square - 107 XL may be overkill if 103 is acceptable?
235/60R18 107V front, 255/55R18 109H rear - both XL, staggered, this is the same setup as my VW ID.4
235/60R18 103H front, 255/55R18 109H rear - staggered, but with only 103 load in front? seems unwise to have such an imbalance.
My instinct is to go with a higher load capacity. What are the downsides to that, other than cost? Are the XLs heavier, worse range, etc.?
235/60 is about 0.5" larger diameter than stock at 29.1 vs. 28.6 stock, a 1.75% difference.
255/55 is about 0.4" larger diameter than stock at 29.0 vs 28.6 stock, a 1.4% difference.
Thoughts?
Sponsored
Last edited: