At my local Subway, the Italian B.M.T. costs more than the Spicy Italian, but contains less protein and has yucky smelly ham. Yet they're both sandwiches offered on the menu and built by the same "artists." ?
Also because people are trained to see the horizontal layout of feature stacks as increasing from left to right, with each option being a step up from the previous. Not Ford's fault there, it's a very common UX for selecting between options or tiers when making a purchase. But easy for most folks to assume and overlook, as most will not pull up the full detailed options tables and compare every feature... or they'll quickly skim them because so many are similar and miss the differences.
I guess I wasn’t clear. I meant that some may assume that the best features on a non-GT would be carried forward to the higher-end models.
Yeah that's fair I suppose.
Yes, front and front corners.
stop making sense! This forum not ready.At my local Subway, the Italian B.M.T. costs more than the Spicy Italian, but contains less protein and has yucky smelly ham. Yet they're both sandwiches offered on the menu and built by the same "artists." ?
As an older person, I would presumr that ”Premium“ is the luxury model with lots of bells and whistles. I would presume “GT” is the performance version. As an older person, to me performance ≠ luxury, and in many cases from a luxury perspective performance < luxury. There are lots of cases where the performance version of a car had insulation delete, heater delete, and/or radio delete because weight is detrimental to performance. I am not sure if that is a “reasonable“ way to look at it, but *to me* it is logical.
I admit that I wasn’t aware there so many options to choose on a GT. For the Premium it was trim, color, drive type, battery capacity and mats. My MME was was for my wife which made range and luxury the priority.
Fixed it for you
?
