My servers run Linux, so BI isn't an option for me.
I mean, this entire thread started with a large US corporation capturing everything they can, and you can bet they'll use every bit of detail against their customers if it comes to it.
I think it is an interesting and troubling story. I just thought the “I’m glad Ford doesn’t do this” might not be factual. Would anyone here stake their life on Ford employees not internally and inappropriately viewing or using driver data? I wouldn’t.
Just a topical joke, bruh. When I hear a story about inappropriately accessing car videos inside people’s garages, hard to resist. I make jokes as warranted on a bipartisan basis, and I detest tribalism (such as what is often on display vis a vis Mr. Musk and Tesla).
I don't think this is logical. Tesla is in business to make money, to provide things their customers need. Why would they do anything "against" their customers, when they need their customers to survive and pay their employees?
I don't think anything the CEO of brand-T does is logical. What he does just happens to excite a lot of followers, which makes him money. Logic doesn't apply. Brand-T is motivated by extracting money from people who believe it can do no harm. They don't care about customers. If they did, the behaviors documented in the article wouldn't have happened more than once...in fact, they wouldn't be recording video to a central server at all.
I WAS IN THE POOL!!
Seems like you know him personally. I don't. News media writers are often biased and their reports are often not a good indicator of a person's character, IMO. But whatever. He can take care of himself. He is a little off center, for sure.
I don't know him. But I observe his behaviors and his patterns and have been doing so since before he wormed his way into Tesla management. I suppose it's easy to blow his behaviors off as "news media writers," but I think blaming "media" is a lazy response to his real and demonstrated behaviors.
It's pretty naive to believe that businesses always operate in the best interests of their customers...
I don't have interior cameras.... but I still am so unhappy with the 'carte blanche' TOU that is required to update FordPass that I have refused OTA of both PowerUp, and FordPass.
What behaviors and patterns have you observed?
Any business that doesn't operate in the best interests if their customers will fail. Even those that try really hard to take care of their customers can fail, so purposely operating against their customers just makes it even harder to succeed. Maybe you don't know this because you have never run or managed a business before.
No. He joined Tesla a year and a half after its two founders, Eberhard and Tarpenning started the company. About 18 months after they started designing the business, they went out to get series A funding, during which they raised $7.5M in funding, $6.5M of which came from Musk. Around that point, he somehow also got onto the board directors and became Chairman of the Board. Then a few years later, he forced the two founders out. As part of a resulting lawsuit settlement he is legally allowed to call himself a co-founder even though he joined well after the business was founded.
I actually own and manage a quite successful business right now.
His behavior is that of actually allowing free speech. It's amazing the number of people who want draconian censorship.
Most of the well known T1 backbone providers (telco & wireless) co-locate the NSA into their facilities. I have a hard time believing they're helping improve anything or are serving anyone's interests but their own. It's especially true on the wireless side where taxpayer money received by these companies are used to 'purchase' the taxpayer's spectrum only to leave it dark in most areas of the country. Most of the country in terms of land-size is underserved in regards to communications because the FCC has allowed companies to squat on frequencies while simultaneously barring anyone from coming in and lighting them up to provide the taxpayers of that area with services.
