phil
Well-Known Member
Who's going to maintain cars for a a defunct manufacturer that only delivered a few thousand vehicles?What would make them a paperweight?
On the whole, I'd rather own a Ford.
Sponsored
Who's going to maintain cars for a a defunct manufacturer that only delivered a few thousand vehicles?What would make them a paperweight?
The final software update.What would make them a paperweight?
I read an early article on them, not a lot on them though. Send like he is a good designer but she was cutting all the cost out, guess her doctoring is in cost “surgery.”The reason a lot of people went in with the Fisker is due to the Magna connection. The reasoning was Magna is a large, respected automotive company with a track record of producing some very nice vehicles on contract and they would keep HF and co inline. I bought into this, but it turned out Magna could not control "the family'. For the record I would still like to see Fisker, the company, somehow to succeed.
Sure.So does that mean we can pick up a Fisker Ocean for CAD5,000 down the line? Without expecting support, of course.
Kind of like the old DiahatsuSure.
But it’ll be a disposable car at that point.
Drive it until it breaks and then is unfixable.