DevSecOps
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Todd
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2021
- Threads
- 69
- Messages
- 4,764
- Reaction score
- 11,624
- Location
- Sacramento, CA
- Vehicles
- '21 Audi SQ5 / '23 Rivian R1T / '23 M3P
- Occupation
- CISO
And just 3 weeks ago the forum was up in arms over me saying that I charge the car to 90% every night due to me not needing to worry about where I need to go and if I have the charge to get there. I was told that I should let it get to 20% before recharging, and now I'm told logic would say otherwise...If I always need to be prepared for a 40 miles drive, I won't arrive home with 10% soc... Instead of keeping another car for this reason.
Gotta love this place!
My point, and the facts are, that an EV will take longer to refuel, end of story. If you need to get somewhere quickly in an emergency an ICE vehicle could be a safer bet. I can take a 5 gallon fuel container from my garage, pour it into my ICE vehicle and get 125 miles within 2 minutes. There's no doing that with EVs. Someone who lives in a flood prone mountainous area might be safer with an offroad ICE vehicle than an MME. Everyone has different circumstances in life and sometimes ICE is just better. Someone did a lightning towing test with a horse trailer and I think they got 75 miles from full to empty. If you need to evacuate your livestock or tow a fifth wheel you might not get far.
I just don't like absolutes in many cases, this being one of them. I'm not agreeing with the weather station, but I'm also not in agreement that EVs are just as good as ICE in all emergency circumstances.
Sponsored
Last edited: