Can some write up "7 hidden Dangers of Relying on reporter that have no idea of what they are talking about."

[sainttail]

Hello Gang. I just read an article called.
"7 Hidden Dangers Of Over Relying On Electric Vehicles"

https://www.slashgear.com/1382663/hidden-dangers-over-relying-electric-vehicles

The writer is Kathryn Olvera

Reading her BIO I cannot even tell if she even allow to drive a car.
https://www.slashgear.com/author/kathrynolvera/

All 7 of her points of why EV's are bad could have been good points like 5+ years ago. (Love the one that silent EV are a danger to kids.)

I'm not a writer but looking at her story she not one too. (Or one that knows about cars)

I used to like reading Slashgear for news on new tech but if their editors let out stories like this, I may have to stop reading them.

Thanks for letting me rant.

Sponsored

 

[kodiakng]

chatgpt: write a story with the headline "7 Hidden Dangers Of Over Relying On Electric Vehicles"

 

[Old_Norm]

ChatGPT is your friend: I just asked it to write an article about reporters spreading false info about electric cars.


Title: Spreading False Sparks: The Danger of Misinformed Reporters in Electric Car Coverage
In recent years, the automotive industry has witnessed a significant shift towards electric vehicles (EVs) as a more sustainable and environmentally friendly mode of transportation. However, this transition has also seen its fair share of challenges, one of which is the spread of false information about electric cars by misinformed reporters. Here, we delve into the dangers of such misinformation.

1. Range Anxiety Amplified: One common misconception perpetuated by misinformed reporters is the idea that electric cars are plagued by "range anxiety." They often exaggerate the limitations of EVs, suggesting that they can't be trusted for long-distance travel. This misrepresentation can discourage potential buyers from considering electric vehicles, stalling the adoption of green technology.
2. Misleading Cost Comparisons: Some reporters with little knowledge of the economics behind electric cars may wrongly conclude that they are more expensive to own and operate than traditional internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles. These inaccurate cost comparisons can deter consumers from making a switch that might actually save them money in the long run.
3. Safety Concerns: Misinformed reporters may exaggerate safety concerns related to electric vehicle batteries, sensationalizing incidents of fires or accidents involving EVs. This fear-mongering can deter consumers from exploring a technology that is continuously improving its safety features.
4. Ignoring Environmental Benefits: A dangerous misconception is the belief that EVs are not truly eco-friendly due to their reliance on electricity generated from fossil fuels. Misinformed reporters often fail to acknowledge the net environmental benefits of EVs, even when powered by partially fossil-fueled electricity grids.
5. Downplaying Technological Advancements: Inaccurate reporting can downplay the rapid technological advancements in the electric vehicle sector. Reporters may overlook improvements in battery technology, charging infrastructure, and overall vehicle performance, painting an outdated and less favorable picture of electric cars.
6. Underestimating Charging Infrastructure: Some reporters might suggest that a lack of charging infrastructure makes EV ownership inconvenient and impractical. While there are certainly challenges in this area, spreading misinformation about the availability and growth of charging networks can discourage potential EV buyers.
7. Neglecting the Role of Government Incentives: Misinformed reporters may not fully understand or communicate the significance of government incentives and policies that encourage EV adoption. Their reporting might mislead readers into thinking that the transition to electric vehicles lacks governmental support.

The dangers of misinformed reporters in electric car coverage go beyond mere inaccuracies; they can hinder the progress towards a greener future and delay the benefits that electric vehicles offer. It is crucial for journalists to take their responsibility seriously, staying informed about the subject matter and providing balanced, well-researched information to the public. Only through accurate and unbiased reporting can society make informed decisions about the future of transportation and its impact on the environment.

 

[sainttail]

If only I can get the original writer to read this

 

[geftsnowball]

Pretty frustrating reading articles that clearly display the writer either doesn't use an EV or only has a super high level understanding and doesn't really know the ins and outs... Read one earlier today (or this week) and immediately knew the author had no clue when they asserted that you -could not- charge at a DCFC outside of 20-80% or something to that effect. I think it was something about range and used the 80% to calculate the total possible range. It didn't say that it was advisable to try and keep it between that range, it asserted that you could not charge above 80%. ??‍

 

[kodiakng]

ChatGPT is your friend: I just asked it to write an article about reporters spreading false info about electric cars.

chatgpt cleaning up a mess - well done. ?

 

[Sir Barton]

Hello Gang. I just read an article called.
"7 Hidden Dangers Of Over Relying On Electric Vehicles"

https://www.slashgear.com/1382663/hidden-dangers-over-relying-electric-vehicles

The writer is Kathryn Olvera

Reading her BIO I cannot even tell if she even allow to drive a car.
https://www.slashgear.com/author/kathrynolvera/

All 7 of her points of why EV's are bad could have been good points like 5+ years ago. (Love the one that silent EV are a danger to kids.)

I'm not a writer but looking at her story she not one too. (Or one that knows about cars)

I used to like reading Slashgear for news on new tech but if their editors let out stories like this, I may have to stop reading them.

Thanks for letting me rant.

This looks like one of those advertising bomb pieces that are growing in popularity on social media, especially on Facebook. A catchy headline, then you click on the story. Some very bad writing ensues, during which they never get to the point while dragging the reader through a minefield of advertising. This one is worse than most, and all of them are bad.

 

[Vulnox]

Some of the points are legitimate, like being more difficult to handle with a fire situation, and the electrical grid will eventually suffer if nothing is done and EV adoption gains significantly. But it's not something that should be used to warn people away from EVs, but as a basis for how we need to adapt to the change. If we had EVs for the last 100 years and someone was trying to make ICE take off, this article would be about the insane costs needed to build refineries, how we need to ensure the tank of flammable liquid is protected as it can also cause a fire, and how fire trucks need to start carrying water instead of just foam because the water is better for ICE vehicle fires. It's just adapting to a situation change. Plus our electrical grid should be receiving more updates than it has, regardless of EVs. I have no patience for excusing negligence in utility maintenance and expansion for a situation that has been building for over a decade now.

That said, this last point confused me.

"Electric cars don't use a combustion engine to disperse heat. So, the only real way to limit the risk of your electric vehicle overheating is to avoid driving it in higher temperatures, something that may not be possible in every season or location."

How... how does an ICE use the combustion engine to DISPERSE heat? The combustion engine is the source of heat, and the radiator and heater core help to disperse heat. Maybe I am just not grasping what they are going for here, but this part seems like someone that doesn't understand ICE vehicles or EVs. Also EVs can absolutely cool or warm the battery and motors. It seems like this was written after a 15 minute drive of a Nissan Leaf from 8 years ago.

 

[Blue highway]

Some of the points are legitimate, like being more difficult to handle with a fire situation, and the electrical grid will eventually suffer if nothing is done and EV adoption gains significantly. But it's not something that should be used to warn people away from EVs, but as a basis for how we need to adapt to the change. If we had EVs for the last 100 years and someone was trying to make ICE take off, this article would be about the insane costs needed to build refineries, how we need to ensure the tank of flammable liquid is protected as it can also cause a fire, and how fire trucks need to start carrying water instead of just foam because the water is better for ICE vehicle fires. It's just adapting to a situation change. Plus our electrical grid should be receiving more updates than it has, regardless of EVs. I have no patience for excusing negligence in utility maintenance and expansion for a situation that has been building for over a decade now.

That said, this last point confused me.

"Electric cars don't use a combustion engine to disperse heat. So, the only real way to limit the risk of your electric vehicle overheating is to avoid driving it in higher temperatures, something that may not be possible in every season or location."

How... how does an ICE use the combustion engine to DISPERSE heat? The combustion engine is the source of heat, and the radiator and heater core help to disperse heat. Maybe I am just not grasping what they are going for here, but this part seems like someone that doesn't understand ICE vehicles or EVs. Also EVs can absolutely cool or warm the battery and motors. It seems like this was written after a 15 minute drive of a Nissan Leaf from 8 years ago.

the "point" about heat is simply a signal that neither the reporter nor the editor have any idea what they are talking about. It's there to remind you to ignore the article in its entirety and avoid the author going forward if possible.

 

[AngryMan]

THIS is the exact reason I let people drive my Mach . Counter the stupidity with enthusiasm and personal experiences . Since Im retired I have the time to stand and have a nice chat with the people who have questions . I will not waste my time with a culture clash warrior but I have the time to educate anyone who's really interested . I explain to them that I don't personally get a dime if they buy one and I don't lose a dime if they don't .Im only there at that point in time as a resource that they can tap into.

 

[AngryMan]

BTW if you're looking for some interesting articles about new tech may I suggest The Cool Down website .

 

[AngryMan]

Anyone tell you that you bear an uncanny resemblance to ....oh never mind . Its probably just my old eyes ...HE'D never wear a Mustang T shirt

 

[Jimrpa]

Some of the points are legitimate, like being more difficult to handle with a fire situation, and the electrical grid will eventually suffer if nothing is done and EV adoption gains significantly. But it's not something that should be used to warn people away from EVs, but as a basis for how we need to adapt to the change. If we had EVs for the last 100 years and someone was trying to make ICE take off, this article would be about the insane costs needed to build refineries, how we need to ensure the tank of flammable liquid is protected as it can also cause a fire, and how fire trucks need to start carrying water instead of just foam because the water is better for ICE vehicle fires. It's just adapting to a situation change. Plus our electrical grid should be receiving more updates than it has, regardless of EVs. I have no patience for excusing negligence in utility maintenance and expansion for a situation that has been building for over a decade now.

That said, this last point confused me.

"Electric cars don't use a combustion engine to disperse heat. So, the only real way to limit the risk of your electric vehicle overheating is to avoid driving it in higher temperatures, something that may not be possible in every season or location."

How... how does an ICE use the combustion engine to DISPERSE heat? The combustion engine is the source of heat, and the radiator and heater core help to disperse heat. Maybe I am just not grasping what they are going for here, but this part seems like someone that doesn't understand ICE vehicles or EVs. Also EVs can absolutely cool or warm the battery and motors. It seems like this was written after a 15 minute drive of a Nissan Leaf from 8 years ago.

I’d like to see some real numbers about this “EV Electrical Grid Catastrophe Looming” claim that’s periodically made. It’s so much more fun to argue over indisputable facts ?

 

[Vulnox]

I’d like to see some real numbers about this “EV Electrical Grid Catastrophe Looming” claim that’s periodically made. It’s so much more fun to argue over indisputable facts ?

Yeah I don't imagine any kind of collapse, usually when people say things like that they envision that every EV owner in the country plugs in at the exact same time. Their "logic" would have to be supported by everyone in the country getting gas in their cars at the same time, which even with our extensively built on gas station system would still cripple a lot of areas if it was actually tried.

The reality seems to be, going by this forum anyway which I know isn't an exact representation of all EV owners but is what we have to go on, that people will charge when it's least expensive to do so which is also when the electrical grid is under the least load (typically). If we suddenly switched to 50% of new vehicle sales being EVs, I can see a situation where certain regions could struggle, even with our huge interconnection systems, but as we aren't selling that many and it's a slow growth pattern so far, hopefully those in charge of power stations and maintenance are planning for that potential future.

 

[Old_Norm]

Anyone tell you that you bear an uncanny resemblance to ....oh never mind . Its probably just my old eyes ...HE'D never wear a Mustang T shirt

We are brothers from different mothers.

Sponsored