mkhuffman
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2020
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 6,875
- Reaction score
- 9,507
- Location
- Virginia
- Vehicles
- 2025 Rivian R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
Some good points for a homeowner with private L2 home charging available to them (and a whole-house generator).
Most ICEV require spark plugs every 100,000 miles (near 10 years of ownership) and $65 oil changes at 8,500 to 10,000 miles, so once per year. Engine air filter replacements are typically 45,000 miles, so every 4 years and most cars take 10 minutes to install a $18 air filter. As a counterpoint, I've read on the MME forum the strategies taken to rotate tires on the MME. It seems overly difficult to perform DIY tire rotations considering the lack of chassis points to lift the MME. One has to be careful of where the jack points are and not use the battery as a chassis member to lift the car. There are aftermarket pucks made for the MME rocker panel (and "No-Lift" stickers) to help. In the time it takes to get tires rotated, the engine of an ICEV can be drained and refilled.
So, while EV naysayers possibly overestimate road trip charging times, having to do the minimal ICEV annual maintenance and tune up an ICE every 10 years as a burden espoused by EV advocates is a bit of a stretch also.
I think the hurricane scenario is a bit of a stretch as well. When hurricane Isabel hit in 2003, we were actually without power for a week. I have a portable generator I run the house on under such circumstances, so I didn't die. But I live on a river, so I was flooded in for a few days, so I couldn't go anywhere anyway (lol). I finally got out using my ICEV 4x4 Truck and Jeep to drive through 30" of water to get out. I'm not sure an MME or Tesla would have been able to do that. I found the electricity in town (where the gas stations are) was on; the grocery store had plenty of fresh food too. I'm sure hurricanes in Florida can be worse, but I'll counter with the numerous flooded EV car fire stories we've all heard or read about. But personally, I can store 18 gallons of gasoline, so in advance of a hurricane I can fuel up my gas car(s) and fuel stores and have easily thousands of miles of range. I have three ICEV with 400+ miles tank range and two with 350 miles - so with the 18 gallons stored and full tanks in all the cars, that's 2,300 miles of range (if the gas stations were out of power that long).
The benefit of 0 - 60 times is a bit pointless in real world use (I'll leave the MME HVBJB issue alone). All my ICE cars (one is 26 years old - @ 8.2 sec.) have completely adequate acceleration capabilities to drive in traffic. We can also leave out of the discussion track use where most EV overheat or run out of energy quickly as a counter point.
And I 100% agree, the MME is a great looking vehicle whether ICEV or EV. Just in the EV market, it is the best looking with the Tycan and Volvo EX-30 not far behind. Compared to Tesla's STALE products, the MME actually has some art to it.
But all my jibber jabber above is personal use case (which was my point - and yours). But looking at the generic automotive market that has a significant number of buyer share who do not have access to L2 private charging, I don't see where EV offers a true advantage when charging comes into play. Based on the MME owner's manual, my understanding is constantly charging with DCFC equipment accelerates HVB battery degradation and shortens total battery life. On top of wintertime non-preconditioning of the battery and cabin, the non-private charging owner kind of gets a bit screwed with EV IMO. Extended road trips are the issue in my opinion. While there are numerous threads and posts here that show EV road trips are feasible, from an ICEV owner's point of view, the extra fuel-stop planning required and somewhat limited path-options involved, greatly moves the needle on the pain-in-the-assometer (PITAM).
It appears we are in agreement that EV are case specific. I am fine with that. It's the legislative side of the discussion I have great issue with. The legislative side is going to positively affect EV advocates (theoretically), yet it is going to adversely affect ICEV users greatly. I see an eventual overall lower standard of living coming out of all this, which I think is unfair to everyone.
https://www.motortrend.com/features/2022-rivian-r1t-bear-lake-boat-launch-retrieval/
Sponsored