apwelsh
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Armand
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2023
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 157
- Reaction score
- 42
- Location
- Riverside, CA
- Vehicles
- 2023 Mustang Mach-e Standard
- Occupation
- Programmer
I don't know how much I believe their claims of losses. Every startup has to pay for R&D as well deal with the high cost of low scale production inherent with starting up a new product line. But that doesn't change the simple economics of the problem. I have one, because I was able to trade in a vehicle for full blue book, and my dealer just wants them off their lot (but they aren't moving) so my total OTD price was just under 40k after all the fees. I did not pay for any extras (made them give me their 3M window protection for free, or remove it) because I don't ever want anything added-on nor ever pay any upcharges of any kind. On top of it all, the monthly cost was still more than I wanted to pay (I could afford it, but won't ever put myself in that position again), so to save the sale, the dropped the price again.What are you talking about? Starting a new product line is expensive. If Ford price the MME at what it would take for them to break even (not even make a profit) it'll be well north of 90k. They lose 36k per EV sold.
Consumer demands are always going up. Standard equipment on Honda civics were luxury options on Mercedes 10 years ago. All that cost money. We have a spending problem.
Simply put, these are not elite cars. In fact, Ford did this to themselves by dropping all their cars and focusing on only trucks simply so they could take advantage of the loop-hole they lobbied for that excludes the EPA restrictions from apply to trucks. Then they jacked up the truck costs. I paid $14k for a RAM 1500 Long Bed in 2000 (when they first came out). I traded it in for $10k five years later, on a $30k Ridgeline that I negotiated the price down to $26, so I only financed the remaining $16k and fees -- basically, I traded up to a luxury truck from a base-model SLT, and my financing we about the same. I ended up selling it for cash after house market crash, about 4 years later, and it was only worth $16k in pristine condition. During all this, wages were stagnant, but I watched as the truck costs doubled, and eventually tripled. Yes, an EV is expensive to make, but Ford could easily invest in that tech and make their money back, if they didn't back themselves into this corner. The only choice for a car now from Ford is a $50k EV (which you can negotiate down about $10k), or a $30k+ Mustang. I don't sympathize over Ford's dilemma, because the only reason the costs are so high, is because the choose to spend their money unwisely on outrageous executive salaries, and stock market manipulation tactics. This is not just Ford, it's everyone today.
If it wasn't for Tesla Model 3, we wouldn't even have a MME, or it would be 2-3x the price. Hertz made some big time mistakes with their ambitious fleet, and their mistake will pay out for all of us, and the used EV market prices will drop. It's a joke that a used Tesla costs more than a new one, but they do, because there aren't enough of them out there. $35k for a 2022 Tesla Model 3 Long Range on Carvana. They only go up as you go elsewhere. dumping this many cars on the used car market might mean I can pickup a Tesla 3 for my seconds BEV, and stash my Fusion Hybrid for long distance trips only, and make it possible for more people to experience ownership of a BEV. It's all part of the market, and we should not worry about production costs -- it's not my concern unless I am a share holder. That should be the concern of Ford's to determine how to fund their projects.
All this is not really the message I meant to get across. I was sparked to throw in my 2cents when I read your comment. But it wasn't even directed at you -- just toward the topic in general.
Sponsored