Jimrpa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Jim
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Threads
- 297
- Messages
- 9,514
- Reaction score
- 12,847
- Location
- Wayne, PA
- Vehicles
- 2021 Infinite Blue Premium Mustang Mach E ER AWD
- Occupation
- Retied (formerly tried to herd highly technical, independent cats)
It’s actually a bit more complex than that. Ford does not report operational expenses for individual plants (a plant may have more than one line, usually making slightly different vehicles), so you’d need to have inside information to know how say, Cuatalin, is doing. Second, Ford, like all companies, loves to toss around HUGE numbers when building a new plant. There’s no better way to ingratiate yourself with various political types than to say “Hey, we’re opening a new $10B facility in your city/district.” Remember the feeding frenzy around Amazon HQ2? In the case of Blue Oval city, I believe there is at least one partner (a battery partner? I forget) so when Ford says “TEN BILLION DOLLARS!!!” That’s not all coming from change Bill dug out of his sofa.Agree that the "per-vehicle" reporting we often hear is misleading. But ultimately it is X amount spent annually minus X amount of revenue from annual sales. And if they're coming up short by $billions/year now in the 4th year of the Mach-E line (and I think 3rd on Lightning and eTransit), it's a problem.
It is hard to know how much of the money spent is for future ventures though, like Blue Oval City. But the fact that Ford has scaled back/delayed many of their EV plans suggests that's only part of it, and they really are far from true profitability on the Gen1 lines. Whatever the per-vehicle number, it must not be close enough to just keep on track with minor tweaks.
All that said, everyone misjudged how the US EV market would grow, so now they’re retrenching and chasing after the hybrid market.
Sponsored