Gloff
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Sean
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2021
- Threads
- 6
- Messages
- 340
- Reaction score
- 581
- Location
- San Francisco
- Website
- www.serramonteford.com
- Vehicles
- 2024 F150 Lightning, 2023 Mach E Extended Range, 2007 Mini Cooper Cab,
- Occupation
- Sales Manager
@RickMachE
This post is entirely the point. Here's a Mach E owner that's had the car a while, and despite that, had a poor road trip experience. That's an experienced EV owner. The average consumer doesn't want to have to do all the nerd math like us big brains. They want to get in the car and go. If you think you're gonna reason with the average consumer on a vehicle purchase, you got another thing coming.
Until infrastructure is so ubiquitous as to be able to DC without having to plan your stops, you're going to get arguments like the OP's and the people he's referencing.
On that end, the fuel cost is merely a defensive excuse. It's not grounded in reality. The real reason is the need to plan and pivot because of the infrastructure. It's like when gas goes up and people go trade in their paid off car to save money on gas. Most of those people don't want to save money on gas, they want a new vehicle and are using the fuel economy as a bridge.
One day we'll get there, but that day is not right now.
I have to laugh when I read this post, especially when it's from an owner of several years. If you had spent any time reading this forum in the past 3 years, you would have had a much better trip.
Using PlugShare, it's clear that the Ennis, Texas Electrify America is a bad stop. Clearly says 1 of 4 working, and it's rated 5.2 out of 10. ABRP would tell you to stop at the Tesla charger in Fairfield, Texas, which is rated 10 out of 10, with 16 chargers. If you don't have your Tesla adapter yet, you could use the EA in Fairfield, which has four 350kW chargers. Looks like it opened recently.
Had you paid $7 for EA's plan for your trip, you would have saved 25%. Instead of 56 cents, you would have paid 42 cents. Breakeven on the $7 would be 50kWh. So you threw money away.
If you got 1.9 miles per kWh, you were driving crazy fast, you should have gotten like 2.6 or so at the worst. What mpg do you get in your F-150 driving that fast?
Computing cost is challenging for so many. You left with a full battery. You said you used 133kWh. Doesn't make sense. At 2.6 you would have used 506/2.6=193. What portion of the 193 did you allocate to the 14 cents?
ABRP has my Premium AWD using 168 roundtrip. I would have arrived home with around 10%, and charged to 90%. So my home cost would be 100-90% (charging before leaving) and 90-10% (charging at home), or 90% of my 91kWh battery. That's 82kWh. So I only have to buy 86kW at 42 cents.
82 x 14 + 86 x 42 = $47.60, vs. your gas F-150 spending $43. So, basically the same cost... Add in the $7 membership fee if you want, so $54.60 vs. $43. Not much more, and more fun to drive (I had an F-150).
Plan your trips better, or complain. Up to you.
This post is entirely the point. Here's a Mach E owner that's had the car a while, and despite that, had a poor road trip experience. That's an experienced EV owner. The average consumer doesn't want to have to do all the nerd math like us big brains. They want to get in the car and go. If you think you're gonna reason with the average consumer on a vehicle purchase, you got another thing coming.
Until infrastructure is so ubiquitous as to be able to DC without having to plan your stops, you're going to get arguments like the OP's and the people he's referencing.
On that end, the fuel cost is merely a defensive excuse. It's not grounded in reality. The real reason is the need to plan and pivot because of the infrastructure. It's like when gas goes up and people go trade in their paid off car to save money on gas. Most of those people don't want to save money on gas, they want a new vehicle and are using the fuel economy as a bridge.
One day we'll get there, but that day is not right now.
Sponsored