How to enhance the 0-60 acceleration?

OP
OP

DK_KIM

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
CA
Vehicles
Mach-E premium extended range RWD
Haha it was my first time.. thank you guys!! I hope we get OTA for enhancing the performance!
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,942
Reaction score
17,391
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Haha it was my first time.. thank you guys!! I hope we get OTA for enhancing the performance!
It’s unlikely because of hardware, electronics, and electricals. I would love to see a kit to upgrade the rear motor, but there is too much support equipment (including stuff inside the battery case) that needs to be changed. ??
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,509
Reaction score
13,295
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
It’s unlikely because of hardware, electronics, and electricals. I would love to see a kit to upgrade the rear motor, but there is too much support equipment (including stuff inside the battery case) that needs to be changed. ??
I would challenge the idea that “too much stuff” needs to be changed for it to be done.

Take a look at any aftermarket supercharger or turbo kit. If that isn’t “too much stuff,” I don’t think swapping out some wires and electrical components would be nearly as involved.

look at all these parts!
Ford Mustang Mach-E How to enhance the 0-60 acceleration? IMG_1267
 


HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,942
Reaction score
17,391
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
I would challenge the idea that “too much stuff” needs to be changed for it to be done.

Take a look at any aftermarket supercharger or turbo kit. If that isn’t “too much stuff,” I don’t think swapping out some wires and electrical components would be nearly as involved.

look at all these parts!
IMG_1267.jpeg
Oh, heck, that’s nothing compared to removing the Oldsmobile engine from my T/A after having built a real Pontiac mill for it. The difference is I can’t pull the battery case, separate it, replace the bus bars, replace half of the powertrain wiring harnesses, HVBJB, and power electronics, reprogram the PCM, SOBB, SOBDMC, etc. (OK, I can reprogram the modules). I’m sure there is other stuff to replace and reprogram. I just wish there was a kit for it rather than having to guess at it. ?‍♂?
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,509
Reaction score
13,295
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
Oh, heck, that’s nothing compared to removing the Oldsmobile engine from my T/A after having built a real Pontiac mill for it. The difference is I can’t pull the battery case, separate it, replace the bus bars, replace half of the powertrain wiring harnesses, HVBJB, and power electronics, reprogram the PCM, SOBB, SOBDMC, etc. (OK, I can reprogram the modules). I’m sure there is other stuff to replace and reprogram. I just wish there was a kit for it rather than having to guess at it. ?‍♂?
Other than the programming that doesn’t exist yet, yes you can drop the battery and replace all that stuff.

Actually after watching my mechanic do the HVBJB recall I would say it’s waaaaaaay easier than installing a twin turbo kit.

That said I don’t think we would have to replace any of that stuff. Just a simple tune and you’re off to the races.

IF you burn out an HVBJB or bus bars or whatever, THEN you replace it.

But until then, why replace parts that aren’t broken? That’d be like swapping out a transmission on a modified ICE Mustang when you don’t have to unless it breaks
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,942
Reaction score
17,391
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Other than the programming that doesn’t exist yet, yes you can drop the battery and replace all that stuff.

Actually after watching my mechanic do the HVBJB recall I would say it’s waaaaaaay easier than installing a twin turbo kit.

That said I don’t think we would have to replace any of that stuff. Just a simple tune and you’re off to the races.

IF you burn out an HVBJB or bus bars or whatever, THEN you replace it.

But until then, why replace parts that aren’t broken? That’d be like swapping out a transmission on a modified ICE Mustang when you don’t have to unless it breaks
You’re not going to burn out the bus bars but the larger bars serve to reduce the probability that the HVBJB will melt. Think of it like the need to change valve springs when going to a hotter camshaft. You might get away with it if the original springs are somewhat new but once they’re a little worn your likelihood of floating the valves and contacting a piston goes up dramatically. We already know that the old bus bars with the third generation HVBJB can result in an SSN with the old power limit. Why poke the bear by increasing the amount of power and the time under power? ?‍♂?
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,509
Reaction score
13,295
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
You’re not going to burn out the bus bars but the larger bars serve to reduce the probability that the HVBJB will melt. Think of it like the need to change valve springs when going to a hotter camshaft. You might get away with it if the original springs are somewhat new but once they’re a little worn your likelihood of floating the valves and contacting a piston goes up dramatically. We already know that the old bus bars with the third generation HVBJB can result in an SSN with the old power limit. Why poke the bear by increasing the amount of power and the time under power? ?‍♂?
Because that’s what I want! More power!!

Even a select RWD can burn out an HVBJB.

Can’t modify any car without fear of breaking something.

Do we know if the HVBJB for a 2024 GT is any different or if the bus bars are different?
 
OP
OP

DK_KIM

Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2024
Threads
1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Location
CA
Vehicles
Mach-E premium extended range RWD
Because that’s what I want! More power!!

Even a select RWD can burn out an HVBJB.

Can’t modify any car without fear of breaking something.

Do we know if the HVBJB for a 2024 GT is any different or if the bus bars are different?
Can Ford get rid of or reduce the power limit by updating remotely like OTA?
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,509
Reaction score
13,295
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
Can Ford get rid of or reduce the power limit by updating remotely like OTA?
According to Ford VP Darren Palmer? Yes.

But it’s been quite a while since he promised that. Summer 2023.
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,942
Reaction score
17,391
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Because that’s what I want! More power!!

Even a select RWD can burn out an HVBJB.

Can’t modify any car without fear of breaking something.

Do we know if the HVBJB for a 2024 GT is any different or if the bus bars are different?
The third generation HVBJB was released in mid-November of 2023. There haven’t been reports of a part number change since LK9Z-10C666-C (GT and Rally models) was introduced. @Mach-Lee reported that the bus bars are different, along with supporting electronics and electricals. So if Ford put in different stuff, you can bet that they have done their accelerated wear testing and projections in order to validate that these items were necessary to reduce their warranty costs (I.e. maintain some level of reliability). Put differently, when I canned an engine to run past 9.5K RPM, I knew I had to change connecting rods because even modified they were good to just past 8.6K. This also necessitated different pistons (due to the rods being slightly longer), a different ring package (harmonic resonance), titanium lifters, etc. ??
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,509
Reaction score
13,295
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
The third generation HVBJB was released in mid-November of 2023. There haven’t been reports of a part number change since LK9Z-10C666-C (GT and Rally models) was introduced. @Mach-Lee reported that the bus bars are different, along with supporting electronics and electricals. So if Ford put in different stuff, you can bet that they have done their accelerated wear testing and projections in order to validate that these items were necessary to reduce their warranty costs (I.e. maintain some level of reliability). Put differently, when I canned an engine to run past 9.5K RPM, I knew I had to change connecting rods because even modified they were good to just past 8.6K. This also necessitated different pistons (due to the rods being slightly longer), a different ring package (harmonic resonance), titanium lifters, etc. ??
Yes, but you KNEW you had to modify those parts to rev that high.

I’m still not convinced 10 seconds of full power will blow stuff up when 5 seconds does not.

Especially since our motors lose power naturally past 30 mph anyways (around our peak tq). I don’t think the 70-110 mph full power is really much more demanding than what we already get.

From the temp scans for the sensors we do have, the temps spike for a fraction of a second and drop quickly even during our 5 seconds.

You knew you needed to upgrade those parts because you definitely would blow the motor up without them. Same as I did (upgraded all the parts) when I put a heads/cam package on my 2002 Trans Am.
 

Mach-Lee

Well-Known Member
First Name
Lee
Joined
Jul 16, 2021
Threads
262
Messages
11,367
Reaction score
25,034
Location
Wisconsin
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium AWD
Occupation
Sci/Eng
Country flag
The third generation HVBJB was released in mid-November of 2023. There haven’t been reports of a part number change since LK9Z-10C666-C (GT and Rally models) was introduced. @Mach-Lee reported that the bus bars are different, along with supporting electronics and electricals. So if Ford put in different stuff, you can bet that they have done their accelerated wear testing and projections in order to validate that these items were necessary to reduce their warranty costs (I.e. maintain some level of reliability). Put differently, when I canned an engine to run past 9.5K RPM, I knew I had to change connecting rods because even modified they were good to just past 8.6K. This also necessitated different pistons (due to the rods being slightly longer), a different ring package (harmonic resonance), titanium lifters, etc. ??
Pack, bus bars, and HVBJB is still the same from what I understand. They upgraded some motor cables on the premium IIRC.
 

silverelan

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2019
Threads
131
Messages
3,688
Reaction score
5,392
Location
Seattle
Vehicles
2021 Mustang Mach-E GT, 2019 Bolt EV
Country flag
Pack, bus bars, and HVBJB is still the same from what I understand. They upgraded some motor cables on the premium IIRC.
basically, there’s nothing inherent to the 21-23.5 hardware that should prevent these cars from matching the charge times of the 24-25s or the original GT/PE cars from getting past the 5 Second Rule.
Sponsored

 
 







Top