AtomicInternet
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2023
- Threads
- 29
- Messages
- 866
- Reaction score
- 1,449
- Location
- SC
- Vehicles
- Focus RS, Mach E Premium
Sponsored
That is what I call it. But people seem to always reply “You mean the electric Mustang?”The T Bird has been rebooted once already.
Aside from the tail lights and RWD it doesn’t share anything with an actual Mustang
I think it should have just named the Mach E minus the Mustang
I have owned and worked on every iteration of the mustang. I‘m glad they didn’t call it Granada. But I would have been fine with Mach-E, that’s what I call it.I really like my new Mach E. I haven’t found much not to like. But I admit that the “Mustang” monicker embarrasses me a bit.
One of my buddies asked me what I thought they should have called it? Before the question I had not given that any thought. I spent an evening contemplating and I have my answer. What is yours?
The MME is the first Ford I have owned but I grew up with Fords, learned to drive in a ‘58 Country Sedan, 292 V8 3 on the tree with overdrive. I remember when the Mustang was introduced and what a departure it was after the failure of Edsel.
and it occurred to me that the era held the answer to what the Mach E should have been named……(Drumroll)…..The Galaxy! A long dormant name from Ford’s past that has the connotation of being about something extra terrestrial and beyond our reach.
Missed opportunity if you ask me.
Rebadging it as a TBird would be a fun project. Especially with an animated bird puddle light.I am perfectly happy with the Mustang name.
But I also totally would have brought back the Thunderbird for an EV.
I don't think it was "cynical" exactly.I'm not sure what they should have called it, but definitely "Mustang" was a cynical choice in order to cash in on the name recognition. IMO, this electric crossover SUV has nothing to do with the legacy of the Mustang moniker. It was born, heart and soul, in 2021 as its own entity. Just wish they would have named it something original. Oh well, c'est la vie.
I won't deny that the styling of the main body resembles the Focus, but the Mach-E is significantly larger.It is the redesign of the Focus electric,, made larger to accommodate the frunk and bigger battery for range, they should’ve left it the Focus.
No.It is the redesign of the Focus electric,, made larger to accommodate the frunk and bigger battery for range, they should’ve left it the Focus.
When BMW introduced an SUV the reaction was “Wow!”. When Porsche introduced an SUV the reaction was “Wow!”. Same for Jaguar and a number of other brands that had never had them before. Same for passenger cars from Maserati and others. Same for EV announcements from entities like Ferrari. Mustang people - “that’s not a Mustang.” That’s ok. As a former Porsche owner I would always say “that’s not a Porsche”.I get the impression Ford didn't really want to call it a Mustang themselves - but needed a recognizable nameplate for some instant recognition. And ultimately they also saw the benefit of the conflict in the name. But that's nothing more than a hunch.
The trouble with pulling an old name and reusing it (like the Galaxy) is that the younger buyers you might want to attract to your fancy new EV aren't going to have any ties to that name whatsoever, if they even recognize it at all. They'd end up right in the same place that the European Ford business is currently in with the new "Capri". You have a bunch of people that used to have Capris and are upset because it's not anything at all like a Capri and another bunch of people that know nothing of that name and just don't care.