dtbaker61
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Dan
- Joined
- May 11, 2020
- Threads
- 126
- Messages
- 4,822
- Reaction score
- 4,524
- Location
- santa fe,nm
- Website
- www.envirokarma.org
- Vehicles
- MME (delivered 2/26/21), DIY eMiata BEV
- Occupation
- Solar Sales/install
It doesn't make a huge difference and I have no gripes about charge time, but why did Ford choose 11kW for Level 2 charging? This has been our only EV that has this limit.
- 2021 Tesla Model 3 Performance: 11.5 kW
- 2022 Rivian R1T Adventure quad: 11.5 kW
- 2024 Chevy Equinox 3LT eAWD: 11.5 kW
Seems the Mach-E is the odd man out in this scenario. Did it just come down to a cost/benefit analysis on Ford's part? In house or tier 1 supply chain availability?
Yes, I know it is nitpicky to question a .5kW difference, but I am truly curious.
mostly a difference in what power level you choose to publish:
power out of the wall, thru the charger, or actually into the battery.
secondarily, the OEMs can be slightly more or less aggressive with current parameters... trading safety margin for better 'specs'. Kinda like jiggering with max battery range if you allow the car to run to 0% rather than 5%.
a slower charge is better for batteries, so as long as your L2 finishes 'overnight', slower is better.
Sponsored