Eric_C_Boston

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Apr 16, 2021
Threads
63
Messages
615
Reaction score
811
Location
North Shore, MA, USA
Vehicles
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD ER
Occupation
Retired Software Engineer
Country flag
I do not know why @Mach-E VLOG has not posted this, although they released a lot of videos recently about the 2023 California Route 1 they are reviewing. The video is great for showing atypical DCFC session with the Mach-E.

I usually recharge on road trips when I get down to 20%, so the sessions for my 2021 ER RWD Premium are shorter than shown (35 to 40 minutes).

Sponsored

 

kltye

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 21, 2021
Threads
19
Messages
1,100
Reaction score
1,733
Location
Chicago
Vehicles
IB MME Premium RWD
Country flag
I will keep harping on this wherever I can, but @Ford Motor Company really, really needs to fix this lousy charging curve. I honestly don't see why they're not maintaining at least 90+kW deeper into the pack. That, and yes - PLEASE add charging details when plugged in. We aren't afraid numbers, I promise you @Ford Motor Company.

This is my version of @Jimrpa's frunk release ? (whose pain I also feel because I'm also a Job 1 owner).
 
OP
OP
Eric_C_Boston

Eric_C_Boston

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Apr 16, 2021
Threads
63
Messages
615
Reaction score
811
Location
North Shore, MA, USA
Vehicles
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD ER
Occupation
Retired Software Engineer
Country flag
I will keep harping on this wherever I can, but @Ford Motor Company really, really needs to fix this lousy charging curve. I honestly don't see why they're not maintaining at least 90+kW deeper into the pack. That, and yes - PLEASE add charging details when plugged in. We aren't afraid numbers, I promise you @Ford Motor Company.

This is my version of @Jimrpa's frunk release ? (whose pain I also feel because I'm also a Job 1 owner).
At least Ford did not go the Toyota bZ4X route.
 

azerik

Well-Known Member
First Name
Erik
Joined
Jan 8, 2023
Threads
79
Messages
4,545
Reaction score
4,556
Location
Chandler/Flagstaff, AZ
Vehicles
'21 Spacey Prem4x, '21 RX450H, 13 Focus EV
Occupation
DevSecNetOps, General PITA
Country flag
OP
OP
Eric_C_Boston

Eric_C_Boston

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Apr 16, 2021
Threads
63
Messages
615
Reaction score
811
Location
North Shore, MA, USA
Vehicles
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD ER
Occupation
Retired Software Engineer
Country flag
What. The wheels falling off?
As https://driving.ca/reviews/comparison/2023-toyota-bz4x-vs-2022-hyundai-ioniq-5-ev-comparison says:
The bigger problem for Toyota is charging. Officially, it’s capable of 100-kilowatt charging, the lowest rating of any modern EV I’ve tested. Toyota’s official specs suggest it can recharge 80 per cent of its battery in an hour. In reality, it doesn’t even charge that fast. Do the numbers and that works out to an average charging speed of 58 kW. That’s not good. In other words, the Toyota is not a long-distance touring machine, its range too short and its recharging speed too slow for serious highway work.
 


The Electric Duo

Well-Known Member
First Name
Patrick
Joined
Jul 25, 2020
Threads
134
Messages
1,787
Reaction score
7,592
Location
Oceanside, CA
Website
machevlog.com
Vehicles
Mach-E GT PE - Grabber Blue - Blucifer Twocifer
Country flag
I do not know why @Mach-E VLOG has not posted this, although they released a lot of videos recently about the 2023 California Route 1 they are reviewing. The video is great for showing atypical DCFC session with the Mach-E.

I usually recharge on road trips when I get down to 20%, so the sessions for my 2021 ER RWD Premium are shorter than shown (35 to 40 minutes).

Thanks. I meant to post it here plus get some feedback. How does everyone feel about the 10 to 80% vs 0 to 100% charging test? We also did an 80 to 10% range test. I know there is some value in testing the whole battery, but I think most people live in those areas of the battery for the most part.
 

SpaceEVDriver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Threads
71
Messages
2,651
Reaction score
4,774
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
2022 CA Route 1 AWD, ER; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Planetary Science
Country flag
As https://driving.ca/reviews/comparison/2023-toyota-bz4x-vs-2022-hyundai-ioniq-5-ev-comparison says:
The bigger problem for Toyota is charging. Officially, it’s capable of 100-kilowatt charging, the lowest rating of any modern EV I’ve tested. Toyota’s official specs suggest it can recharge 80 per cent of its battery in an hour. In reality, it doesn’t even charge that fast. Do the numbers and that works out to an average charging speed of 58 kW. That’s not good. In other words, the Toyota is not a long-distance touring machine, its range too short and its recharging speed too slow for serious highway work.
Toyota seems to be purposefully sandbagging EVs. I really don't understand their position.
 

SpaceEVDriver

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2021
Threads
71
Messages
2,651
Reaction score
4,774
Location
Arizona
Vehicles
2022 CA Route 1 AWD, ER; 2023 Lightning Lariat ER
Occupation
Planetary Science
Country flag
Thanks. I meant to post it here plus get some feedback. How does everyone feel about the 10 to 80% vs 0 to 100% charging test? We also did an 80 to 10% range test. I know there is some value in testing the whole battery, but I think most people live in those areas of the battery for the most part.
I think 10-80 is much better than 0-100.

On my longer road trips, I typically charge above 80% because that's usually where it is when I'm done with my walk/bio-break/shopping/etc. I don't usually go into the 10% SOC space unless I'm headed home or there's a good reason to go lower.

Here's a table from a recent 2600 mile round trip. My average arrival SOC was 35%; average departure SOC was 82%.
{Edit}: Added some columns to the table.

Charger Arrival SOC %Charger Leave SOC %Energy deliveredCharge DurationCharger BrandAverage charge rate
3780--
398542 kWh43 minutesEA59 kW
347236 kWh20 minutesEA108 kW
2092*L2 Charge-
478257 kWh36 minutesEA95 kW
408138 kWh25 minutesFrancis Energy91 kW
2090--
1880--
6695*L2 Charge-
198462 kWh42 minutesEA89 kW
288048 kWh30 minutesEA96 kW
5396*L2 Charge-
329054 kWh45 minutesEA72 kW
418440 kWh32 minutesEA75 kW
294110 kWh23 minutesCharge Point26 kW
218459 kWh41 minutesEA86 kW
2292*--
647514 kWh13 minutesEA65 kW
 
Last edited:

Shayne

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2020
Threads
18
Messages
3,824
Reaction score
2,738
Location
Northern Ontario Canada
Vehicles
2021 MME4x Prem
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
This is my version of @Jimrpa's frunk release ? (whose pain I also feel because I'm also a Job 1 owner).
No remote start (departure scheduling) is mine. Lots done on subscription services last year but not much on what makes the car work. Hard to figure out their logic and what they are going for ;)
At least Ford did not go the Toyota bZ4X route.
You to get 2 charges a day so bring a pup tent. There is always some one that has it worse. I guess we all feel better now.
Thanks. I meant to post it here plus get some feedback. How does everyone feel about the 10 to 80% vs 0 to 100% charging test? We also did an 80 to 10% range test. I know there is some value in testing the whole battery, but I think most people live in those areas of the battery for the most part.
Good to see you finally got to drive the fast color. ;) When you drive in -30C (-22F) above 80% charge matters. At 15C (58F) we are in shorts and the car has range. At 80% it use to drop to 14KW then 44KW then 33KW has it gone back to 44 KW again? 44 works for me as all I use is 50 KW chargers and need 90% in the winter due to distance between chargers up here. My vote charge up to 90% and show people how that works.
 

SWO

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2021
Threads
21
Messages
2,222
Reaction score
2,802
Location
MD, USA
Vehicles
2022 Mach E GT, 2021 Escape PHEV, 2019 F-150
Country flag
Toyota seems to be purposefully sandbagging EVs. I really don't understand their position.
I think Toyota has a history of being (overly) cautious from an engineering/technology perspective. They are always a generation behind. A perfect example is their trucks - they just did a refresh for 2022, but before that the Tundra had specs (horsepower, mileage, towing, 6-speed transmission, etc..) that other makes had 10 years ago. The current Tacoma is worse, basically early/mid 2000s tech.
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,929
Reaction score
17,373
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Toyota seems to be purposefully sandbagging EVs. I really don't understand their position.
The previous Chairman, Akio Toyoda, was about as anti-EV as a leader in the auto industry can get. He retired at the end of last month. We shall see how former Lexus number 1 Tojo Sato does in this role. ?‍♂?
 
OP
OP
Eric_C_Boston

Eric_C_Boston

Well-Known Member
First Name
Eric
Joined
Apr 16, 2021
Threads
63
Messages
615
Reaction score
811
Location
North Shore, MA, USA
Vehicles
2021 Ford Mustang Mach-E RWD ER
Occupation
Retired Software Engineer
Country flag
Thanks. I meant to post it here plus get some feedback. How does everyone feel about the 10 to 80% vs 0 to 100% charging test? We also did an 80 to 10% range test. I know there is some value in testing the whole battery, but I think most people live in those areas of the battery for the most part.
When I get queried about the range, I do give the 100% to 0% number, but add that the car is not meant to be driven like that. Who drives an ICE to empty? It is really just a comparison number. Watching videos and other information before buying my MME informed me that 180 to 210 was the realistic range (10% or 20% to 80%) for road trips in an ER RWD. Even going for the maximum range, I am happy with the performance. It is not the fastest off the block, but still handy when I have to merge into traffic.
 

ADDZ71

Well-Known Member
First Name
Austin
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Threads
10
Messages
217
Reaction score
215
Location
Brevard, NC
Vehicles
21 MME Premium ER AWD (sold) 22 MME GT (Del 5/22)
Occupation
Lithium expert
Country flag
For range in my GT I usually tell people that during the winter months I feel comfortable driving 180 miles and during the summer probably 225. I don't get into if I were doing a long trip and how low I would take the battery or the stop and charge limit as those numbers would end up being lower.
 

mkhuffman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Threads
29
Messages
6,875
Reaction score
9,507
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2025 Rivian R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
Country flag
I think Toyota has a history of being (overly) cautious from an engineering/technology perspective. They are always a generation behind. A perfect example is their trucks - they just did a refresh for 2022, but before that the Tundra had specs (horsepower, mileage, towing, 6-speed transmission, etc..) that other makes had 10 years ago. The current Tacoma is worse, basically early/mid 2000s tech.
I think this is the reason. Quality and reliability is at the core of Toyota, and taking chances on unproven technology is very difficult for them to do culturally. I bet that is why the battery charge speed is so slow - they are more worried about battery damage than other manufacturers.
 

Wetsuitt

Member
First Name
Bruce
Joined
Dec 19, 2022
Threads
5
Messages
22
Reaction score
12
Location
Lake Milton, OH
Vehicles
2023 Mach-E GT - 2006 Mustang GT Conv
Occupation
Sales Engineer
Country flag
I think 10-80 is much better than 0-100.

On my longer road trips, I typically charge above 80% because that's usually where it is when I'm done with my walk/bio-break/shopping/etc. I don't usually go into the 10% SOC space unless I'm headed home or there's a good reason to go lower.

Here's a table from a recent 2600 mile round trip. My average arrival SOC was 35%; average departure SOC was 82%.

{EDIT}
Note that the charge sessions with an asterisk on the SOC numbers were on L2 chargers either overnight or while working or at dinner so my DCFC average is a bit lower than the number I gave above.

Charger Arrival SOC %Charger Leave SOC %
3780
3985
3472
2092*
4782
4081
2090
1880
6695*
1984
2880
5396*
3290
4184
2941
2184
2292*
6475
Charged T
Sponsored

 
 







Top