Coyote Chaser
Member
- First Name
- Don
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2021
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 11
- Reaction score
- 6
- Location
- USA
- Vehicles
- Mustang
Running 12s right out of the box is pretty darn good. With a little work you can be running 11s!
Sponsored
Maybe ford where originally not, but with all the delays they can't have any excuses of there being no model Y to benchmark against for coming up short. The 1/4 times posted so far are similar to those of I-pace and polestar 2 both vehicles with far less power and neither of which use 'performance' namingIf they truly were gunning for the Model Y Performance then they have missed their mark
Yeah, Elon deciding passengers didn’t need adjustable lumbar support is a real pain in the back.I actually cancelled a M3P order for a variety of reasons beyond the scope of this thread, including a Tesla surprise decision, which I surmised was secretly related to material shortages, to remove parts and features from the car, in addition to a lack of some standard features common to the $60k+ price range.
If the GTPE falls short of the hype, I’ll probably go back to ICE for a few years. Electric in itself isn’t enough to keep me on the hook.
I remember an interview in which a Ford rep said the GTPE is built to nearly keep up with a porsche GTS - I really bought that line.
Yeah, Elon deciding passengers didn’t need adjustable lumbar support is a real pain in the back.
Not with a trap speed of 100 mph it wontRunning 12s right out of the box is pretty darn good. With a little work you can be running 11s!
Well, Ford’s silence is quickly becoming deafening.If he's not just trolling it seems maybe these Motors don't really have abilities to continue pulling juice over certain speeds as well as competing EVs. This was part of what had the standard Mach e well behind model Y... It was close upto some speed.
I was sorta hoping for a bit different motor setup somehow on the GT though that would have more grunt upto higher RPM. But lack of media being allowed coverage pre launch may have been cause they knew the GT was a bit of a marketing trick and not quite upto traditional Mustang GT standards over pedestrian car other than at lower speeds.
Is that standard AWD or RWD, I could image with the smaller motor being the limiting factor for the AWD model, we really need to look at the 1/4 is for a RWD only and see if it pulls as expected all the way to the end.If he's not just trolling it seems maybe these Motors don't really have abilities to continue pulling juice over certain speeds as well as competing EVs. This was part of what had the standard Mach e well behind model Y... It was close upto some speed.
I was sorta hoping for a bit different motor setup somehow on the GT though that would have more grunt upto higher RPM. But lack of media being allowed coverage pre launch may have been cause they knew the GT was a bit of a marketing trick and not quite upto traditional Mustang GT standards over pedestrian car other than at lower speeds.
In the UK (I assume same for rest of Europe) there is not GTPE as all GT's are GTPE so hopefully ford will live up to the marketing of which I see no to 75mph warning ?Well, Ford’s silence is quickly becoming deafening.
In May, I was oh so close to ordering a Model 3 LR. Then they pulled the radar sensors, I said forget that, and ended up swapping to a Mach E reservation. While I am generally irritated by Elon, I’m compelled by the performance of his cars. Was hoping I could get that level of performance over here, but now I don’t know what to think!I actually cancelled a M3P order for a variety of reasons beyond the scope of this thread, including a Tesla surprise decision, which I surmised was secretly related to material shortages, to remove parts and features from the car, in addition to a lack of some standard features common to the $60k+ price range.
In Europe it’s called a Royale with CheeseIn the UK (I assume same for rest of Europe) there is not GTPE as all GT's are GTPE so hopefully ford will live up to the marketing of which I see no to 75mph warning ?
![]()
Thank you for gathering this data.It launches like a bat out of hell and then falls on its face around 75 mph.
I never sniffed a 3.5 0-60 though more like 3.8 or 3.9 (with 1' rollout) but to be fair that's with two 200 pound guys in it so to me it's pretty much mission accomplished for 0-60, it's just past that that it is disappointing.
I agree it would seem that while the initial range estimate of 235miles was under promised and then over delivered with an EPA of 260 mile3.8s/3.9s 0-60 isn't that satisfying either. That's consistent with OP's best result (3.78s). I was hoping that Ford would under promise and over deliver on the 0-60 time like certain European manufacturer, but it doesn't seem to be the case here.