Sometimes science hurts. Or as an old cowboy from Oklahoma used to say, it may be sad but it's true.This is the same idiot who made a video that said bigger wheels = less range. I have a hard time watching anything from him after that.
Not sure I understand your point. The video where he concludes large rims are less efficient than small rims was void of science that supported that conclusion. And so many people use that video as proof it annoys the crap out of me. Because it isn't proof. And it isn't science.Sometimes science hurts. Or as an old cowboy from Oklahoma used to say, it may be sad but it's true.
I agree with you Mark. Rolling resistance is lowest with larger diameter narrow wheels than smaller wide ones. When I used to drive a model T in the snow and mud it would go places todays driver would not believe. Part of that was of course the weight of the car. But having pushed by hand a lot of wagons and trailers on the farm, you quickly realize why horse drawn wagons and carriages had such big wheels. Today we have equipment that can measure rolling resistance. Any physics lab could measure this. I'll be you could even measure the amps on today's wheel balancer's when bead seating.Not sure I understand your point. The video where he concludes large rims are less efficient than small rims was void of science that supported that conclusion. And so many people use that video as proof it annoys the crap out of me. Because it isn't proof. And it isn't science.
I wrote up a long critique of that video a few months ago, and I should see if I can find where I posted it in the forum.I agree with you Mark. Rolling resistance is lowest with larger diameter narrow wheels than smaller wide ones. When I used to drive a model T in the snow and mud it would go places todays driver would not believe. Part of that was of course the weight of the car. But having pushed by hand a lot of wagons and trailers on the farm, you quickly realize why horse drawn wagons and carriages had such big wheels. Today we have equipment that can measure rolling resistance. Any physics lab could measure this. I'll be you could even measure the amps on today's wheel balancer's when bead seating.
I wrote up a long critique of that video a few months ago, and I should see if I can find where I posted it in the forum.
But basically, his analysis of the impact of different wheels is incomplete, and he makes conclusions based on an incomplete analysis. He spends most of his time analyzing the weight difference, and practically no time analyzing aerodynamics and rolling resistance. Aerodynamics and rolling resistance are the two biggest factors when it comes to wheel efficiency, by far. Yet he essentially ignores them.
That is why I can't stand that video and it has ruined my opinion of the guy, Unfortunately.
His video was lazy. Yes, bigger wheels are GENERALLY less efficient, but it isn't because they are heavier. Weight is just one factor. All he had to do was go through some wind tunnel data, and some rolling resistance data, but he didn't. He was lazy. He seems smart, but laziness won out.EE always distills things and takes liberties. I've found that he's typically on the right path, if a little simplified. I don't dismiss his thoughts entirely, but as with any information you find on the internet, verify from multiple sources. I mean he's not Scotty Kilmer.