Matt Bagne
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Matt
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2022
- Threads
- 3
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 171
- Location
- Placentia, CA
- Vehicles
- Alfa Romeo Quadrifoglio, Ford Bronco on order
I applaud your enthusiasm as well as the innovation, you are an example of the entrepreneurial spirit that makes the market go.Kickstarter is a crowdfunding platform for creators/makers. Some small companies use it as an incubator for new products. It is NOT a platform for retail sales.
People who donate to the project are backers. In this case, I have only shared this project with Mach-E owners because they are the only ones that benefit from it. Backers are in collaboration with the creator(s) and receive "rewards" as incentives to join the project. These usually include the thing being created and possibly some add-ons for different levels of support.
At this point, I have invested in developing a working prototype. It is not a production-quality part, but the design is close. I'm hoping the scale of the MME owners community helps me speed things up. They make donations to fund the creation.
I didn't want to go to Ford with just a 3D print. I wanted to have a credible product when I speak to them about licensing. So the Kickstarter serves several purposes.
1) I can iterate on my design and source a production grade Pony emblem with injection molded plastics and embedded circuits. Backers receive emblems that are new, but have undergone quality and functional testing; a good thing for them. I can also then send a nice demo proof-of-concept to Ford along with statistical performance data as I work licensing possibilities. It is important to note that this is not an exact recreation of the GT emblem. This is a recreation of the current Non-GT emblems. It will maintain the current identity.
2) I can gain feedback from MME owners on the product, installation, future features, etc.
This is not a for-profit effort [yet]. If the product has a market beyond this development campaign, then I will only move forward with Ford's support and licensing.
I do hope they work with us/me. If licensing debates kill this, which they could with their legal power against a small creator, then the harder to reach Asian manufacturers would certainly bring a similar product to market.
One last consideration: what made Mustang the best selling sports car for the last 50 years? I would argue that it is the huge aftermarket driven by an enthusiastic owner-base who love to modify and personalize their Ponies. EVs are a different animal, and if we are further limited from modifying the Mach-E, then the critics are right: it's Not a Mustang.
I do not believe I have seen you remark in this thread that you have indeed consulted a trademark attorney. I have worked in licensing most of my career, and although I am not an attorney, I work with them on a regular basis in trademark law.
Ford, Disney, Apple . . . it doesn't matter who it is, any company will go to great lengths to protect their trademarks, especially their flagship IP. Cease and Desist Letters go out all the time to small operators working out of their garage and selling on the Internet, I have seen it many times.
People make the mistake thinking that "It's okay to copy because I am not selling it" . . . you do not need retail sales to infringe, merely "benefiting" on a public platform from someone's IP will constitute infringement and/or if the IP holder feels you are likely to create confusion in the public domain with people thinking the item or product "comes from" or is "endorsed by" the IP holder when it is not.
And whether you are right or wrong with an issue that could be borderline . . . if Ford sends you a Cease and Desist letter, what are you going to do? Fight it by hiring an attorney and spending ten's of thousands of dollars to have a court rule on it?
Also, many people with a single product idea think they can just "get a license", but that is rarely the case. Most large licensors will want to see that the product and person/company who makes it already has a track record before they put their name on it. Why would a company as large as Ford want to take the risk with someone who is not known in the marketplace? Especially a product that hooks into the electronics of one of their flagship cars . . . what if your unknown, first-time product causes a short in the system creating a battery to explode because of faulty production. Can you guarantee that won't happen? How about the insurance that all licensees must carry, especially for a product that goes "on the vehicle" (as opposed to a Ford cap or T-shirt), it will require a policy for Product Liability in the $3 million range at least. The contract will also require "Minimum Guarantees" meaning that you will need to guarantee possibly $20,000 or more in paid royalties over the contract term . . . and at say 15% royalty (fairly standard) that would be close to $150,000 in sales to just meet the guarantee. There are often mandatory Marketing Fees (possibly another 2%) as well as admin costs for royalty reporting and other needs required by licensees. The factory that makes any portion (or all) of the item will also need to be pre-approved and sometimes an audit is required. You may also be required to have a UL certification or other testing that Ford requires to bring the item up to "OE specifications" . . . testing will be thousands of dollars using a third party laboratory, and of course if it does not meet specs, further costs will be required for product changes and the re-testing.
A lot goes into this, just encouraging to think ahead. And if I were you I would consult a competent trademark attorney regarding your plans. Good luck!
Sponsored