Jimrpa
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Jim
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2020
- Threads
- 231
- Messages
- 7,125
- Reaction score
- 9,479
- Location
- Wayne, PA
- Vehicles
- 2021 Infinite Blue Premium Mustang Mach E ER AWD
- Occupation
- Retied (formerly tried to herd highly technical, independent cats)
Actually, I thought there actually WAS a design defect in the original Pinto’s that caused a piece of metal structure to either puncture the fuel tank or sever the neck of the fuel filler and allow fuel to drip down onto hot exhaust system components, causing the fuel to ignite and burn? If I remember, the “scandal” was that Ford engineers caught the scenario very late in design, and an actuarial calculation was made, leading to the decision not to go through a costly retooling, redesign and product launch delay, and instead to accept the risk that the failure could occur and the resulting cost (liability) from that failure. Very sadly, juries place a much higher cost on photos of burned human remains than the actuarials calculated. They also didn’t account for the massive loss in goodwill that the incident caused. My dad had a 1978 pinto station wagon (not a model impacted) and it was a pretty decent car for the era. By today’s standards, it was very primitive.That fuel tank would never have burst into flames if the idiot hadn't used a rag as a gas cap.
Sponsored