Mrn
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Mike
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2022
- Threads
- 79
- Messages
- 625
- Reaction score
- 474
- Location
- Pima County
- Vehicles
- MMES
- Occupation
- Aviation
- Thread starter
- #1
You make a good point in the second paragraph.To me, the decision of MachE vs Tesla come down to one thing.
Did I want a car company learning to integrate technology or a technology company learning to make a car?
Ford's far from perfect, but they've learned a thing or two in the last 100+ years of building cars. (learned some of those lessons multiple times).
With maybe 200 miles of range.I can’t wait until Lexus gets there BEV out.
I agree, I wouldn't want that call either. Like I said, Ford is far from perfect and some lessons they've learned, they forgot and had to learn again... multiple times. But designing and building a car is complicated. Way more than most people realize. Automotive history is littered with startups that don't last...Packard, AMC, Pontiac, Delorean, DeSoto, etc... There's a list a mile long. The fact that Ford is still around after 100+ years, means they've learned things along the way.You make a good point in the second paragraph.
But, what have they learned, exactly? They have the most warranty claims in the industry, the most recalls, 25% too many engineers than their competitors, left 2 billion dollars of profit on the table and a culture that may prevent real change.
I am not advocating buying a Tesla but I wouldn’t be advocating for Ford either.
I enjoy the MME overall but wouldn’t let my wife take it on a long trip alone. Not a great sales pitch.
all she needs to see is “drive mode not available” or “12 V battery low voltage” or “stop safely now” or “drivetrain malfunction” and there are more things I can’t think of. I wouldn’t want to be on the other end of that phone call.
I agree with you that I am not so sure Tesla will make it long term. If they do, maybe they will continue to be a niche player. They haven’t changed models yet. people will get tired of the same old thing. Let’s see how Tesla handles those changesI agree, I wouldn't want that call either. Like I said, Ford is far from perfect and some lessons they've learned, they forgot and had to learn again... multiple times. But designing and building a car is complicated. Way more than most people realize. Automotive history is littered with startups that don't last...Packard, AMC, Pontiac, Delorean, DeSoto, etc... There's a list a mile long. The fact that Ford is still around after 100+ years, means they've learned things along the way.
I could be completely wrong, but I don't see Tesla around in 10 or 20 years. Once the big automakers are heavily invested in the electric car market (happening as we speak), I'm not sure Tesla survives long term as a standalone company. Plus, they won't be selling their carbon credits to make profit.
Yep, there's a learning curve all manufacturers will go through transitioning to EV. How they handle those problems will determine their success.I agree with you that I am not so sure Tesla will make it long term. If they do, maybe they will continue to be a niche player. They haven’t changed models yet. people will get tired of the same old thing. Let’s see how Tesla handles those changes
all new EVs are having issues. I have read forums for BMW and Porsche EVs. Not a whole lot different than Ford.
hopefully these companies hire the “right” engineers to develop and fine tune their software. For legacy companies the car is the easy part, technology , the hard part.
The problem with Tesla is that they use aluminum panels which is really hard and costly to repair.The gigacastings are a huge issue from a repairability standpoint, in my opinion.