The EV Naysayers

mkhuffman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Threads
29
Messages
6,875
Reaction score
9,507
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2025 Rivian R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
Country flag

The "market" seems to want us all dead.
Do you realize you are included in "the market"? So you want us all dead?
Sponsored

 

kodiakng

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Oct 1, 2022
Threads
19
Messages
903
Reaction score
1,407
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
2023 Cyber Orange 4X Mach-E
Country flag

mkhuffman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Threads
29
Messages
6,875
Reaction score
9,507
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2025 Rivian R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
Country flag
It is not invisible. It is the accumulation of millions of people making individual decisions. It may seem invisible to the uniformed, but it is not. It is democracy at its best - each person voting with their pocketbook. And the best thing is? No politicians.
 

kodiakng

Well-Known Member
First Name
David
Joined
Oct 1, 2022
Threads
19
Messages
903
Reaction score
1,407
Location
Oregon
Vehicles
2023 Cyber Orange 4X Mach-E
Country flag
It is not invisible. It is the accumulation of millions of people making individual decisions. It may seem invisible to the uniformed, but it is not. It is democracy at its best - each person voting with their pocketbook. And the best thing is? No politicians.
damn, all humor is lost. ?
 

mkhuffman

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Nov 19, 2020
Threads
29
Messages
6,875
Reaction score
9,507
Location
Virginia
Vehicles
2025 Rivian R1T Tri-Max, Jeep GC-L, VW Jetta
Country flag


HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,929
Reaction score
17,370
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
Meh. I have an EV because it's fun (well, mainly because I'm pissed off at PG&E so I want to use my excess PV generation). Doesn't mean I don't own two gas-guzzling ICE machines right now. They're fun too. The naysayers on either side need to get a grip. ??
 

TheSteelRider

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Threads
57
Messages
1,296
Reaction score
2,309
Location
United States
Vehicles
'21 Premium RWD
Country flag
I'm going to do it, because I'm pretty sure nobody in the previous 12 pages has yet.

"Nay I say! I say Nay!"

There, now I'm a nay sayer.

continue.
 

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
13,293
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
So you live an impact free life? Right...
Of course not, no one does.

One thing everyone here probably agrees on is that we should have some sort of “balance” with nature without being too extreme one way or the other.

While literally everyone here uses petroleum products daily. Even our EVs are highly dependent on petroleum.

Tires, lubricants, hoses, plastics…….. all a part of the car. Then there’s the shipping and manufacturing of those products…….. petroleum. Then the workers commuting to work etc.

An EV isn’t remotely petroleum free. But yes, it uses “less.”

And yet even the “EV naysayers” are unlikely to do an oil change in their driveway and just let the used oil spill everywhere or just pour it wherever they like.

And even the “EV believers” aren’t worried about nature enough to walk or bike to work, live without heat or a/c or plastics etc.

We all choose which level of “balance” with nature we are willing to accept.

But anyone unwilling to go completely off grid, buy zero consumer goods and grow their own food can’t exactly look down on others for which car they drive.

My last car averaged 11 mpg.

But I live 1 mile from work and drive less than 4k miles per year. My environmental impact was less than the average BEV or Prius driver for sure.

Living closer to work makes a much bigger difference than what you drive. But I wasn’t gonna yell at everybody who commutes for destroying the planet. ?
 

MellowJohnny

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christian
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
95
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
2,832
Location
YYZ
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium AWD
Occupation
Solution Architect
Country flag
I don’t think forcing EVs on Anyone is a good thing.

Americans should be able to choose what vehicles they want, period!

Both parties and their cronies suck!
The problem with this argument is the assumption that people are capable of making the “right” decision. There are many examples of government bans or mandates which were put in place to “force” a behaviour - banning leaded gas, asbestos, and incandescent light bulbs, mandating seat belts, air bags, and speed limits - the list goes on. All these things made products more expensive in the short term, and took away “choice”.

Mandates for “the greater good” are not new. Seatbelt mandates were quite controversial back in the day, and lots of vocal people initially fought them pretty hard - now nobody gives it a second thought. The government mandated their use ostensibly because the general population could not be trusted to make the right decision.

You can argue that mandating EVs is not the same as mandating seatbelts & their use, but philosophically the argument is the same - we can’t always be trusted to make the “right” decision.

Government makes decisions for us all the time, this isn’t a new concept.
 

HuntingPudel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
88
Messages
12,929
Reaction score
17,370
Location
Bay Area, CA
Vehicles
2024 MME GT with Performance Upgrade, 1979 Fire-Am, 1972 K/5 Blazer
Occupation
Engineering
Country flag
I'm going to do it, because I'm pretty sure nobody in the previous 12 pages has yet.

"Nay I say! I say Nay!"

There, now I'm a nay sayer.

continue.
I don't neigh. I woof. ??
 

DugthePug Dad

Well-Known Member
First Name
Pat
Joined
Aug 7, 2023
Threads
38
Messages
850
Reaction score
1,660
Location
California
Vehicles
2023 Mach E premium
Occupation
Retired
Country flag
The problem with this argument is the assumption that people are capable of making the “right” decision. There are many examples of government bans or mandates which were put in place to “force” a behaviour - banning leaded gas, asbestos, and incandescent light bulbs, mandating seat belts, air bags, and speed limits - the list goes on. All these things made products more expensive in the short term, and took away “choice”.

Mandates for “the greater good” are not new. Seatbelt mandates were quite controversial back in the day, and lots of vocal people initially fought them pretty hard - now nobody gives it a second thought. The government mandated their use ostensibly because the general population could not be trusted to make the right decision.

You can argue that mandating EVs is not the same as mandating seatbelts & their use, but philosophically the argument is the same - we can’t always be trusted to make the “right” decision.

Government makes decisions for us all the time, this isn’t a new concept.
You may be okay with the government mandating to you. I am not and I don’t agree with it.

If you think the government can be trusted to make the “right” decisions always then I don’t know what to tell you…

we will just have to agree to disagree on this issue.
 
Last edited:

Mach1E

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2021
Threads
93
Messages
10,508
Reaction score
13,293
Location
Florida
Vehicles
69 Mach 1, 11 GT, 21 GTPE- sold, 24 Taycan 4S, 20 F type R
Country flag
The problem with this argument is the assumption that people are capable of making the “right” decision. There are many examples of government bans or mandates which were put in place to “force” a behaviour - banning leaded gas, asbestos, and incandescent light bulbs, mandating seat belts, air bags, and speed limits - the list goes on. All these things made products more expensive in the short term, and took away “choice”.

Mandates for “the greater good” are not new. Seatbelt mandates were quite controversial back in the day, and lots of vocal people initially fought them pretty hard - now nobody gives it a second thought. The government mandated their use ostensibly because the general population could not be trusted to make the right decision.

You can argue that mandating EVs is not the same as mandating seatbelts & their use, but philosophically the argument is the same - we can’t always be trusted to make the “right” decision.

Government makes decisions for us all the time, this isn’t a new concept.
Yes, similar mandates have been made in the past.

This one is much much larger and pretty much impossible to pull off in the timeline given though.

We don’t have the supply chains to make it happen. Don’t have the infrastructure either.

And most importantly? The product isn’t viable as a 100% replacement for the products being banned.

It’s not as simple as lightbulbs that aren’t as bright nor toilets that don’t flush as well.
 

MellowJohnny

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christian
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
95
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
2,832
Location
YYZ
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium AWD
Occupation
Solution Architect
Country flag
Yes, similar mandates have been made in the past.

This one is much much larger and pretty much impossible to pull off in the timeline given though.

We don’t have the supply chains to make it happen. Don’t have the infrastructure either.

And most importantly? The product isn’t viable as a 100% replacement for the products being banned.

It’s not as simple as lightbulbs that aren’t as bright nor toilets that don’t flush as well.
I don't disagree, and I think you bring up a point that Government should be making right now: let's agree this is, to borrow a management term, a stretch goal.

Be honest with the public. We might not make it - in fact I don't think we will. But I think we will get pretty close, and we will get much further ahead by putting a stake in the ground and striving to achieve it. The alternative is we throw up our hands, say "this is hard", point to all the excuse we have floating around, and get nowhere.

I also think the other thing missing is the idea that we need exceptions - we banned pesticides for residential use in the province of Ontario at least 10 years ago. But there are exceptions - golf courses can still use them as the ban would have put undue burden on them. Same here. Not everyone can do it without placing undue burden on them. I'm sure we could come up with logical exceptions.

So I think there is some PR that could be done here to ease the blowback and explain the plan a bit better. People don't like being told what to do, but if you explain why and address people's concerns and fears, people get on board.

North Americans have accomplished at lot of things that were "hard" and may have seemed impossible at the time, but we got the job done because we didn't give up trying.
 

MellowJohnny

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christian
Joined
Nov 16, 2021
Threads
95
Messages
1,683
Reaction score
2,832
Location
YYZ
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium AWD
Occupation
Solution Architect
Country flag
You may be okay with the government mandating to you. I am not and I don’t agree with it.

If you think the government can be trusted to make the “right” decisions always then I don’t know what to tell you…

we will just have to agree to disagree on this issue.
I'm not actually taking a position here, just stating that the Genie is already out of the bottle. Governments mandate stuff all the time. Some mandates over the years I have agreed with - bans on smoking in public for example (I'm not a smoker) - while others I think have been stupid, like banning incandescent bulbs.

We are generally free to do most things in society, but when something we do is deemed to be detrimental to others (like smoking in public), Government sometimes steps in.
 

jay1122

Well-Known Member
First Name
jay
Joined
Apr 11, 2022
Threads
1
Messages
380
Reaction score
338
Location
NJ
Vehicles
2021 Mustang Mach E select AWD
Country flag
Yeah, let's just penalize the poor because they can't afford a $62k MME. If they can't afford to pay for gas, I guess they can just take government hand-outs and sit at home and watch TV. Or they can walk to work in in the rain. Who cares about them anyway, right?

Do you care at all about how these policies impact real people who have real bills and real families?
LOL, the gas price is only a relative. As well as standard of living. You think it is unacceptable because it used to be $1.5/gallon not long ago. Americans are privileged. Many Asian and European countries have way worse gas price than US with less income. And they are still living. You just have to adapt and drive less with more efficient cars. Maybe do more public transportations.

Of course you could stick the head in the sand. Keep driving 15 mpg big V8 SUVs and Pickups because gas is cheap. You can afford it. Will the poor driving Prius get impacted? Of course. But everyone has to make sacrifices in order to shift the market towards a more sustainable future. I do not believe change will come naturally and instantly. That is why EV credits are necessary to help people shift away from ICE. A straight up ban on ICE will just bring too much turmoil. Gradually increasing gas price to push down the demand of inefficient ICE is making more sense to me.

If you only care about your bill, then sure you would not agree. You probably want to invade some middle east countries for cheaper gas.
Sponsored

 
 







Top