mikeinet

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Oct 5, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
554
Reaction score
438
Location
New York
Vehicles
Standard AWD Tech/Comfort
Occupation
Cyber Security, First Responder
Country flag
So....no road trips or spirited driving?
exactly...?

I've got a road trip tomorrow and was planning to DC... per trip planning id get home with like 6% battery left... but I don't particularly like that closeness to zero so was going to stop for a quick juice stop... but maybe now its not worth it (I've only done DC like twice on the car)
Sponsored

 

Mathington

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2021
Threads
20
Messages
882
Reaction score
868
Location
Canada
Vehicles
Mach-E Premium SR AWD
Country flag
Well I can tell you that even if your car arrives at the dealership, if this recall is announced nobody is getting their car until the fix is applied, but I'm guessing you know that.

The other thing is that it will apply to roughly half of the cars produced so far. I'm willing to be it's all the ER cars and none of the SR cars, but I could be wrong there.


EDIT: And this just in...Whomp, there it is!

Mike
Why do you think it's only ER cars?
 

rcechinel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rod
Joined
Dec 30, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
855
Reaction score
870
Location
Atlanta
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium ER AWD
Occupation
Tech
Country flag
You're assuming people are going to look into this like that lol. You're just wrong right off the bat, they'll take their car in, dealer will say just software and they'll go on their way. Plenty of recalls say "dealer will inspect blah blah and based off that will do XX." Engine recall, dealer check for leaking oil, if none, do this to prevent it from leaking. People don't then go, wait, I still want my entire engine rebuilt, that's bullocks!

You're also speculating way too much and constantly saying you know they're related, then you aren't sure, then blah, blah. Saying you KNOW and then saying they're just scenarios is making everything so convoluted.
Well, I apologize if that's how it came across. I'm definitely speculating, since I'm talking about human behavior, like a million of the posts here. What I said that is known is because it's confirmed by Ford. I hope you are right about people's perceptions and reactions.
Let's scrap it and move on. None of this affects me, since my car is not built yet.
 

mikeinet

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Oct 5, 2021
Threads
43
Messages
554
Reaction score
438
Location
New York
Vehicles
Standard AWD Tech/Comfort
Occupation
Cyber Security, First Responder
Country flag
Why do you think it's only ER cars?
it makes more sense it may be more applicable to ER cars... but we've documented numerous SRs that have had the failure already in the tracking thread
 

Av8tor

Well-Known Member
First Name
Kevin
Joined
Aug 6, 2021
Threads
30
Messages
708
Reaction score
921
Location
Richmond, VA
Vehicles
Fusion Hybrid, MME GTPE
Occupation
Systems Engineer IOT
Country flag


timbop

Well-Known Member
First Name
Tim
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Threads
65
Messages
6,832
Reaction score
14,036
Location
New Jersey
Vehicles
Solar powered 2021 MME ER RWD (CA RT1)
Occupation
Software Engineer
Country flag
Lol, are you kidding me? I don't even have a GT. I'm still waiting for my car to be built (Premium AWD ER). I have zero emotions about this and I'm playing out scenarios because, you know, that's what we do here.
I don't think my speculation is baseless, since we know:
1- There is a new part, with a new part number for new and fixed cars (at dealers)
2- We are hearing Ford execs saying this will be a software update type of a recall for many of the cars

So, doing 2 without doing 1 will make some people think their cars are not really fixed. Because if it's only a software update, why bother with developing a new part? Unless it's determined that SR and RWD are not prone to this issue.
I see. So the scenario that a software issue causes the hardware to do something that damages it is too obscure for you? It's not possible that the inspections are to see if that happened, and if it did then the hardware gets replaced? If it didn't occur then everything is fine and the hardware replacement isn't necessary?

You're deciding what is true in a vacuum with no information other than your imagination.
 
Last edited:

rcechinel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rod
Joined
Dec 30, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
855
Reaction score
870
Location
Atlanta
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium ER AWD
Occupation
Tech
Country flag

Tyldum

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Threads
1
Messages
361
Reaction score
376
Location
Norway
Vehicles
Mustang Mach E First Edition
Country flag
Uh, I don’t think we know this at all?
One guy here in Norway got this error last week and they replaced the junction box.

Hopefully the software "fix" is a temporary measure by reducing power while waiting for the replacement part.
 

Mike G

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
Mar 27, 2022
Threads
25
Messages
6,455
Reaction score
5,297
Location
N. AL, USA
Vehicles
'23(J1) Mach-E GT-PE, '22 F-150 Lightning, '24 Bronco HLE 2Dr
Country flag
Why do you think it's only ER cars?
Well It may be more than that, but the reports that it's roughly 50% of the cars that have been produced tells me there has to be some discriminator, right? If we were to assume that all GTs were affected due to their performance oriented software settings, and the fact that they all use the same battery pack that the ER uses...can we then surmise or speculate that this affects all AWD ER cars regardless of trim level?

It's got to be something if it affects half the "installed base". So maybe RWD SRs are totally safe from this. I don't know, I'm just trying to sort out which half of the total number of produced cars it would apply to.

Mike
 

Mathington

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2021
Threads
20
Messages
882
Reaction score
868
Location
Canada
Vehicles
Mach-E Premium SR AWD
Country flag
Well It may be more than that, but the reports that it's roughly 50% of the cars that have been produced tells me there has to be some discriminator, right? If we were to assume that all GTs were affected due to their performance oriented software settings, and the fact that they all use the same battery pack that the ER uses...can we then surmise or speculate that this affects all AWD ER cars regardless of trim level?

It's got to be something if it affects half the "installed base". So maybe RWD SRs are totally safe from this. I don't know, I'm just trying to sort out which half of the total number of produced cars it would apply to.

Mike
True, with SR models, the power output would be less and therefore less heat.
Hopefully my SR AWD is unaffected :S
 

rcechinel

Well-Known Member
First Name
Rod
Joined
Dec 30, 2021
Threads
9
Messages
855
Reaction score
870
Location
Atlanta
Vehicles
2022 Mach-E Premium ER AWD
Occupation
Tech
Country flag
One guy here in Norway got this error last week and they replaced the junction box.

Hopefully the software "fix" is a temporary measure by reducing power while waiting for the replacement part.
To be clear: if the problem occurs, the only fix is to replace the HVBJB. Which it doesn't mean it's the new one. Like most cars "fixed" to date, if not all, they got the same part and it can fail again (and it has, in multiple occasions. one guy here had this happen 3 times).
For the cars that didn't have a problem so far, maybe the software update it's all is needed. But there is a new part number moving forward, this has been confirmed.

Now we have to wait for more details. Execs coming out saying "It will be all fixed with a software update" feels like expectation management, but I hope I'm wrong.
Sponsored

 
 







Top