DevSecOps
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- Todd
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2021
- Threads
- 69
- Messages
- 4,764
- Reaction score
- 11,624
- Location
- Sacramento, CA
- Vehicles
- '21 Audi SQ5 / '23 Rivian R1T / '23 M3P
- Occupation
- CISO
- Thread starter
- #1,336
If you check here you can see all the data on amps at HVBJB failure. I don't think amps while cruising along at a steady pace or going downhill has ever been an issue. Most of the time people report that the failures happen while overtaking a vehicle or going up inclines which would not be cruise control gliding down the highway. The instances of failure typically have a component of high speed with resistance or acceleration.I have inserted some of the numbers here. The amps required for steady cruising at any given speed don't depend strongly on the model of Mach E. These numbers are for an AWD SR vehicle. The main factor as speed rises is the aerodynamic drag on the car which will be very similar for all models. Of course, when accelerating or climbing there will be additional power required and therefore higher amps flowing.
See the section for DCFC. Models like the GT can charge up to 150kW which is 395A at 380V. You mention observations of 450A. If the battery voltage at a low SoC was something like 333V then 450A would deliver 150kW. Does anyone have measurements of battery voltage versus SoC?
See the section on Maximum Power. The published maximum power of the GT is 358kW which, at a battery voltage of 380V, will require 942A of current. With a low SoC battery at 333V that would require 1075A which ties in with the observation of current values up to 1100 amps. Remember, however, that the HVBJB contains inline fuses rated at 630A for the rear motor and 350A for the front motor = 980A total. Of course, no fuse blows at its rated value but 1100A is 7.5% over the total rated fused current.
It would be interesting to know if the program logic of the inverters and the DCFC controller compensate for the different battery voltage at different SoC and allow more amps to flow at lower battery voltage than at higher battery voltage and so maintain the same maximum power.
Speed, xdot mph m / s F road / lbf F road / N P road / W P road / kW Efficiency / miles per kWh Amps / A 0 0 32 142 0 0.0 0 10 4.470272687 38 168 752 0.8 13.3 2 20 8.940545373 48 212 1896 1.9 10.5 5 30 13.41081806 61 273 3664 3.7 8.2 10 40 17.88109075 79 352 6291 6.3 6.4 17 50 22.35136343 101 448 10008 10.0 5.0 26 60 26.82163612 126 561 15051 15.1 4.0 40 70 31.29190881 156 692 21652 21.7 3.2 57 80 35.76218149 189 840 30045 30.0 2.7 79 90 40.23245418 226 1006 40462 40.5 2.2 106 100 44.70272687 267 1189 53138 53.1 1.9 140 110 49.17299955 312 1389 68306 68.3 1.6 180DCFC DCFC rate / kW 50 132 115 303 150 395Maximum power Mach E RWD SR 198 521Mach E AWD SR 198 521Mach E RWD ER 216 568Mach E AWD ER 258 679Mach E GT 358 942Mach E GTPE 358 942
The specs you're referencing are slightly wrong which is likely why some of your numbers are off. For example the MME can exceed 150kw for short periods and it's not relative to SOC. The DCFC chargers have an initial burst amperage that feed the car up to about 430-450A at 360-380 nominal volts which get it into the 160-170kw range. This only lasts for a about 90 seconds and requires a higher amperage DCFC station.
Sponsored